How To: A New Platoon Leader's Guide to Maintenance
By 1LT Christian Arnette
Article published on: June 20, 2025 in the Armor Summer 2025 Edition
Read Time: < 16 mins
U.S Army SPC Keontae Shack, SSG James Ferrone, and SPC Blake Oakely inspect a Bradley
for faults during the 2024 Sullivan Cup at Fort Benning, GA. (Photo by SGT Duke Edwards)
Imagine you're a second lieutenant (2LT) in an armored brigade combat team (ABCT) and you've just been
placed in charge of your first platoon. You're now responsible for not only a few dozen Soldiers, but also a
platoon's vehicles and ancillary equipment. How does a leader ensure these vehicles and supporting equipment
function as designed? The broad answer is an effective maintenance program. At a minimum, maintenance must
be managed at the platoon level. All platoon leaders should prioritize maintenance, as platoons train most
effectively when their equipment is fully operational. Platoon leaders should become experts on their
equipment status report (ESR), maintain effective platoon maintenance standard operating procedures (SOPs),
and know how to conduct maintenance in all environments.
When I reported as a new mechanized infantry platoon leader in the 1st Battalion, 8th Cavalry Regiment (1-8
CAV), I encountered challenges related to maintenance operations and equipment readiness. After two years
with 1-8 CAV, including my current role as the battalion maintenance officer (BMO), I have learned more
about maintenance than I ever thought possible. Much of the knowledge I now possess would have helped me
immensely as a platoon leader, for I would've been more effective at building combat power and maintaining
readiness.
I once thought maintenance was an impossible task for a platoon leader to master, but it is now clear that
the opposite is true. While it may seem overwhelming at first, all it takes is a bit of self-study and
dedication. A platoon leader who cares about maintenance is demonstrating care for their Soldiers and for
the success and lethality of their platoon.
“I once thought maintenance was an impossible task for a platoon leader to master, but it is
now clear that the opposite is true. While it may seem overwhelming at first, all it takes is a bit of
self-study and dedication. A platoon leader who cares about maintenance is demonstrating care for their
Soldiers and for the success and lethality of their platoon.” - 1LT Christian Arnette
A common misconception is that maintenance pertains only to Armor or Stryker formations, but it matters to
all platoon leaders. Every platoon owns some form of equipment, which must function properly for the platoon
to operate effectively. Properly functioning equipment keeps soldiers alive and helps them accomplish their
mission. Another common misconception is that the company executive officer (XO) handles the entire
company's maintenance in conjunction with the company's field maintenance team (FMT). This could not be
further from the truth. While the company XO may be the steward of the company's maintenance program,
platoon leaders play a critical role. A platoon leader is responsible for the success or failure of the
platoon, and that includes maintenance. A platoon cannot train or fight effectively if its equipment isn't
working properly. There is no point in planning training if the entire event is spent recovering and
repairing equipment. A unit's operational readiness must peak at the line of departure.1
Figure 1. An example ESR page recreated from the GCSS-Army's End User Manual+ (EUM+). Of
note, this ESR contains no live data and uses generic unit representations. (U.S. Army Graphic)
How to Read an ESR
The first thing a platoon leader must understand is their ESR. The ESR, accessible through the Global Combat
Support System – Army (GCSS-Army), provides detailed insights into equipment and unit readiness. While the
company commander and XO typically have access, a platoon leader can obtain viewing access by coordinating
with their battalion's maintenance team and following the necessary procedures.2
The first time looking at an ESR can be daunting—it may feel like a foreign language that platoon leaders
are expected to understand immediately. However, once the headings on the ESR are understood and their
corresponding information is recognized, reading it becomes much easier. The purpose of the ESR is to
provide a clear picture of the status of a unit's equipment. If there is an issue with a piece of equipment,
it must be reflected on the ESR. Additionally, a fault must be listed on the ESR to order a part for it. The
ESR serves as an essential system of record, enabling a platoon leader to hold themselves and their
battalion's maintenance enterprise accountable. Each ESR page features four headlining rows at the top,
distinguished by progressively smaller font sizes in descending order, as seen in Figure 1. Of all the
details on an ESR, there are a few that matter to platoon leaders the most. Their definitions, and how they
can improve a maintenance program, are described in Figures 2 through Figure 5. The first four pieces of
information are found in the second headlining row.
Figure 2. This example ESR shows the key information from the 2nd headlining row. (U.S.
Army Graphic)
Platoon Maintenance SOPs and Best Practices
With the maintenance knowledge I've gained as a BMO, I often reflect on how I could have run a more
effective platoon maintenance program. One of the key improvements I would have made is establishing
structured maintenance SOPs, including weekly maintenance battle rhythm events, such as command maintenance
days and platoon maintenance meetings.
Most platoons already participate in command maintenance days, often referred to as “Motor Pool Monday”, but
these events could be more efficient and impactful. As a mechanized infantry platoon leader, I frequently
had my mounted sections conducting preventative maintenance checks and services (PMCS) on our M2A3 Bradley
Fighting Vehicles (BFVs), while my dismounts often had little to do. I now understand the critical
importance of conducting weekly ancillary equipment maintenance by properly allocating priorities and
manpower.
At a minimum, companies should prioritize ancillary equipment maintenance on a rotational basis. This can be
achieved by platoon leaders working with the Company XO to create a four-week maintenance schedule,
dedicating each week to a specific category of ancillary equipment:4
- Communications Equipment (e.g.,radios and Joint Battle Command-Platforms [JBC-Ps])
- Weapons Systems
- Night Vision Devices (NVDs)
- All Other Platoon Equipment
During periods of increased manning, this schedule can be condensed, allowing more equipment to undergo PMCS
each week. By proactively maintaining ancillary equipment, potential issues can be identified and resolved
before field operations. Conducting after-operations PMCS for the first time postfield exercise is too
late—preventative maintenance must be consistent and systematic to ensure operational readiness.
Communications equipment should be tested weekly through communications exercises (COMMEX) using radios and
JBC-Ps. Even if higher headquarters does not mandate a weekly COMMEX, platoons should conduct them
internally. The company communications representative can fill these systems, enabling platoons to conduct
internal checks. Many units, including the 1st Cavalry Division, may already require a weekly COMMEX, making
it essential to meet the commander's intent.
Platoon maintenance meetings should be a weekly battle rhythm event. In 1-8 CAV, maintenance meetings are
held at both the battalion and company levels, but they rely on information reported up from the platoons.
Conducting platoon- level maintenance meetings fosters a shared understanding among the leadership and
ensures platoon leaders are well-prepared to provide accurate briefings.
Figure 3. This example ESR shows the key information from the 3rd headlining row. (U.S.
Army Graphic)
Platoon maintenance meetings should cover several key agenda items, with a primary focus on reviewing the
ESR line by line. The platoon leader should facilitate the discussion, while section and squad leaders brief
the faults for their assigned equipment. It is essential that platoon, section, and squad leaders understand
the statuses of their equipment. Additionally, the radio- telephone operator (RTO) and armorer should assist
in briefing the status of communications equipment and weapons. Ideally, all soldiers would be proficient in
reading the ESR, but at a minimum, the platoon's leadership, RTO, and armorer must be well-versed in it.
When time allows, platoons should review the “wide open” ESR, which includes both deadline and nondeadline
faults. Overemphasis on the NMC ESR often leads to neglecting slash faults, which can escalate into more
severe equipment issues. The “wide open” ESR also provides visibility on open work orders, such as pending
welding jobs, allowing soldiers to track ongoing repairs for their equipment.
Services
Vehicle and equipment services should be another key agenda item in platoon maintenance meetings. Platoon
leadership must understand the service schedule for each piece of equipment to prevent overdue services, as
overdue equipment cannot be used until serviced.
Service plans consist of three key dates:
- Early Date – The earliest allowable completion date.
- Planned Date – The scheduled service date in GCSS-Army.
- Late Date – The latest allowable completion date before the equipment becomes delinquent.
The early and late dates represent a 10% variance window before and after the planned date in which the
service must be completed. Completing a service before the early date can disrupt future service schedules
by shifting them forward. Missing the late date results in delinquency without shifting the future service
windows. Platoon leadership must also understand the steps involved in a service to track progress
effectively. Battalion and company commanders may inquire about equipment status, and platoon leaders should
be prepared to provide accurate updates.
Dispatches
Before a vehicle leaves the motor pool, it must be properly dispatched. Tracking open and overdue dispatches
in platoon maintenance meetings ensures compliance and prevents unauthorized vehicle use. Dispatches serve
as a commander's tool to verify vehicles are FMC and maintain accountability for equipment assigned to
different missions. Platoon leaders must ensure their crews process dispatches through the FMT clerk before
vehicle use and properly close them upon mission completion. If a mission extends beyond the original
dispatch window, the current dispatch must be closed, and a new dispatch packet must be completed in
accordance with the unit's dispatch SOP. To maintain accurate mileage records and prevent premature service
triggers, soldiers should only approach the clerk to close a dispatch after recording the correct mileage in
the dispatch book. This step ensures accurate mileage tracking under optimized service plans.
Figure 4. This example ESR shows the key information from the 4th headlining row. (U.S.
Army Graphic)
Army units often require 10-mile road marches for each vehicle quarterly. This road march can be done in
conjunction with training events as long as at least 10 miles are driven during the duration of the event.
Some battalions prefer to make these road marches battle rhythm events on the calendar, whereas others leave
it up to the companies and platoons. 1-8 CAV does not make it a battle rhythm event, but we track company
adherence to this policy by including usage reports in our battalion maintenance meetings. As a trickle-down
effect, our companies have included these reports in their company maintenance meetings. Usage reports can
be pulled from GCSSArmy, and they are systems of record that display the distances travelled by vehicles
during a selected period. This mileage is tracked by the change in odometer readings between dispatches,
therefore making accurate mileage reporting extremely important when opening and closing dispatches.
Two other important metrics that should be tracked in platoon maintenance meetings are the Army Oil Analysis
Program (AOAP) and test, measure, and diagnostic equipment (TMDE). AOAP monitors petroleum, oil, and
lubricant (POL) samples to ensure vehicle health and identify engine, transmission, gearbox, or hydraulic
failures before they occur8. Samples must be drawn and submitted at intervals prescribed by the AOAP lab and
submitted for testing. The company XO can pull AOAP due dates from a program called the Army Enterprise
Systems Integration Program (AESIP) for the platoon leader to include in their platoon maintenance meetings.
TMDE is a list of parts, tools, and equipment that need to be calibrated at specific intervals to ensure
they are accurate and effective9. Most of these items are owned at the company level, but some platoon
equipment may need calibration. A platoon leader should confirm if any of their sub-hand receipt (SHR) is
enrolled in TMDE and include their service dates in their platoon's slides.
Another SOP that units should establish is Class IX (CL IX) management. CL IX is the Army's class of supply
for repair parts. CL IX management is often done at the battalion and company levels, but it should be done
at the platoon level as well. For example, Combat Company, 1-8 CAV, dictated that only platoon leaders and
platoon sergeants could sign for CL IX from the FMT non-commissioned officer in charge (NCOIC). This was to
maintain better accountability of parts and ensure they were issued to the right vehicle. If a part was
installed on the wrong vehicle, then the vehicle needing the part wasted a lot of time on the ESR. If the
company does not have an SOP, then the platoon should establish one. Will only the platoon leader or platoon
sergeant be able to sign for CL IX? Will section leaders be allowed to do it? My recommendation is that only
the platoon leader and platoon sergeant sign for parts. This allows for better awareness and accountability
within the platoon's maintenance program.
Figure 5. This example ESR shows additional key information from the 4th headlining row.
(U.S. Army Graphic)
Allowing the platoon's soldiers to sign for parts makes CL IX management more difficult for the entire
company. Crews may not know if the part they need was ordered for another vehicle. Additionally, when CL IX
is issued for a vehicle, it needs to be installed immediately to fix the fault. If it is operatorlevel
maintenance (maintenance that can be conducted per the 10-level technical manual [TM]), then members of the
crew can apply the part. If it is mechanic-level maintenance (maintenance conducted per the 20-level TM),
then a mechanic needs to hang the part. If a parts manual is available for that piece of equipment, then the
source, maintenance, and recoverability (SMR) code can be checked in the maintenance allocation chart (MAC)
to see who installs it. The SMR code has five characters. The third character, which is the maintenance
code, identifies the maintenance level for replacement. A maintenance code of ‘C' means a crew or operator
can replace the part, and a maintenance code of ‘F' means unit-level maintainers can replace the part.
Sometimes ‘O' is listed in place of ‘F' in older MACs.7
Whenever a part is hung by a mechanic, whether in shop or on the motor pool line, a member of that vehicle's
crew needs to be present.
An important maintenance SOP affecting unit lethality is 24-hour maintenance when pacing equipment parts are
received for deadline faults. If a part arrives that would make a pacing vehicle (commonly called a pacer)
FMC, then continuous work needs to occur to make it happen. Maintenance will occur until the part is hung
and the fault is fixed. The purpose is to remove the amount of time a pacer is on the ESR, and it helps
improve the battalion's operational readiness.
Unusable, recoverable parts removed from equipment join the overage repairable items list (ORIL). These
parts need to be returned to the Army so they can be repaired and issued back out to the force. Units
receive monetary credit back for parts turned in. ORILs are monitored at the battalion and brigade level,
and poor management of these parts can cause a unit's ORIL to be extremely long. Operators need to clean the
parts and give them to their FMT clerks for turn-in. Platoon leaders should work with their Company XO to
get a list of platoon ORILs to be tracked internally.
Field Maintenance
Field maintenance is probably one of the most overlooked aspects in maintenance. Soldiers tend to forget or
avoid it until their equipment breaks. Field maintenance is often equated to cleaning weapons in the field,
but it is so much more than that. Soldiers need to PMCS their equipment in the field daily. According to
Army Regulation (AR) 25-30 Army Publishing Program, each piece of equipment is
supposed to be accompanied by a TM.8 When a Soldier draws a piece of equipment, they should draw the TM as
well. TMs should remain in vehicles too. While the Army is beginning to modernize with all-in-one tablets
that include both the TM and Department of the Army (DA) Form 5988-E, it is a good practice to maintain a
paper copy of the TM in the vehicle. As long as those copies aren't lost or destroyed, paper TMs are a great
contingency for when tablets break or run out of battery.
“Whenever a part is hung by a mechanic, whether in the shop or on the motor pool line, a
member of that vehicle's crew needs to be present.” - 1LT Christian Arnette
There are three types of PMCS: before, during and after operations.9 At a minimum, the during operations PMCS should
be completed in the field daily. This will help crews identify problems before they become significant, and
it gives the FMT a chance to fix them before more intensive maintenance is required.
Printing capabilities are usually extremely limited in the field. Therefore, platoon leaders should ask
their XOs to bring several DA Form 5988-Es for each vehicle prior to starting a field problem. If printing
is an option, XOs can ask for the forms in their daily logistics package (LOGPAC) requests. Soldiers should
complete PMCS of their vehicles and equipment on these 5988s daily. Leaders throughout the platoon should
spot check the accuracy of the PMCS, then they should be submitted to the XO. Conducting continuous field
PMCS will allow both the FMT and the battalion's maintenance enterprise to stay up to date on all
maintenance issues within the unit.
Final Notes
A platoon leader should make it their priority to establish good relationships with their Company's
mechanics. They are the ones that keep the vehicles in the fight and their job is challenging. There are
long hours, lots of physical work, and rarely any downtime. A platoon leader also needs to allow the FMT
time to PMCS and maintain their own assigned vehicles. An FMT's efficacy relies heavily upon its vehicles'
capabilities. If their M88 is NMC, they are unable to recover tracked vehicles. If their palletized load
system (PLS) is down, they will be unable to bring their forward repair system (FRS) and field pack-up (FPU)
container (also known as a BOH, after the company that makes them), into the fight. While it is important
for a platoon to have faults verified and fixed promptly, time needs to be given to the FMT to do the same
thing.
Maintenance can be an intimidating aspect of the Army to all leaders, but it is especially nerve-racking for
new platoon leaders. If the proper focus and dedication is given to maintenance, it isn't that scary. As a
BMO, I believe that while maintenance perfection is impossible, an effective maintenance program is
extremely achievable. To build an effective program at the platoon level, a platoon leader must study the
ESR, ask maintenance questions to anyone who will listen, and be present in the motor pool. Units with
effective maintenance programs, regardless of the echelon, are the most lethal. Lethality is like a house –
training is the structure that builds lethality, but maintenance is the foundation on which it stands on.
The house cannot last if there is no foundation.
7. Army Techniques Publications 4-33, Maintenance
Operations, 09 January 2024, appendix C
8. Army Regulation 25-30, Army Publishing Program, 14
June 2021, paragraph 1-28
9. Army Regulation 750-1, Army Materiel Maintenance
Policy, 02 February 2023
Author
Christian Arnett is a First Lieutenant currently serving as Executive Officer of a
Military Intelligence Company within the Regimental Military Intelligence Battalion, 75th Ranger
Regiment. Previous assignments include Battalion Maintenance Officer for 1st Battalion, 8th Cavalry
Regiment, 2nd Armored Brigade Combat Team, 1st Cavalry Division, and Infantry Platoon Leader for C
Company, 1st Battalion, 8th Cavalry Regiment, 2nd Armored Brigade Combat Team, 1st Cavalry Division. His
military education includes Ranger School, Basic Airborne Course, Bradley Leader's Course, and Infantry
Basic Officer Leader Course, all completed at Fort Benning, Georgia. Arnett holds a Bachelor of Science
in environmental engineering from the University of Iowa.