How To: A New Platoon Leader's Guide to Maintenance
By 1LT Christian Arnette
Article published on: June 20, 2025 in the Armor Summer 2025 Edition
Read Time:
< 16 mins
U.S Army SPC Keontae Shack, SSG James Ferrone, and SPC Blake Oakely inspect
a Bradley for faults during the 2024 Sullivan Cup at Fort Benning, GA.
(Photo by SGT Duke Edwards)
Imagine you're a second lieutenant
(2LT) in an armored brigade combat
team (ABCT) and you've just been
placed in charge of your first platoon.
You're now responsible for not only a
few dozen Soldiers, but also a platoon's
vehicles and ancillary equipment. How
does a leader ensure these vehicles
and supporting equipment function as
designed? The broad answer is an effective
maintenance program. At a
minimum, maintenance must be managed
at the platoon level. All platoon
leaders should prioritize maintenance,
as platoons train most effectively when
their equipment is fully operational.
Platoon leaders should become experts
on their equipment status report
(ESR), maintain effective platoon maintenance
standard operating procedures
(SOPs), and know how to conduct
maintenance in all environments.
When I reported as a new mechanized
infantry platoon leader in the 1st Battalion,
8th Cavalry Regiment (1-8 CAV),
I encountered challenges related to
maintenance operations and equipment
readiness. After two years with
1-8 CAV, including my current role as
the battalion maintenance officer
(BMO), I have learned more about
maintenance than I ever thought possible.
Much of the knowledge I now
possess would have helped me immensely
as a platoon leader, for I
would've been more effective at building
combat power and maintaining
readiness.
I once thought maintenance was an
impossible task for a platoon leader to
master, but it is now clear that the opposite
is true. While it may seem
overwhelming at first, all it takes is a
bit of self-study and dedication. A platoon
leader who cares about maintenance
is demonstrating care for their
Soldiers and for the success and lethality
of their platoon.
“I once thought maintenance was an impossible task for a platoon leader to master, but it is now clear
that the opposite is true. While it may seem overwhelming at first, all it takes is a bit of self-study and
dedication. A platoon leader who cares about maintenance is demonstrating care for their Soldiers and
for the success and lethality of their platoon.”
- 1LT Christian Arnette
A common misconception is that maintenance
pertains only to Armor or
Stryker formations, but it matters to all
platoon leaders. Every platoon owns
some form of equipment, which must
function properly for the platoon to
operate effectively. Properly functioning
equipment keeps soldiers alive and
helps them accomplish their mission.
Another common misconception is
that the company executive officer
(XO) handles the entire company's
maintenance in conjunction with the
company's field maintenance team
(FMT). This could not be further from
the truth. While the company XO may
be the steward of the company's maintenance
program, platoon leaders play
a critical role. A platoon leader is responsible
for the success or failure of
the platoon, and that includes maintenance.
A platoon cannot train or fight
effectively if its equipment isn't working
properly. There is no point in planning
training if the entire event is spent
recovering and repairing equipment. A
unit's operational readiness must peak
at the line of departure.1
Figure 1. An example ESR page recreated from the GCSS-Army's End User Manual+ (EUM+). Of note, this ESR
contains
no live data and uses generic unit representations. (U.S. Army Graphic)
How to Read an ESR
The first thing a platoon leader must
understand is their ESR. The ESR, accessible
through the Global Combat
Support System – Army (GCSS-Army),
provides detailed insights into equipment
and unit readiness. While the
company commander and XO typically
have access, a platoon leader can obtain
viewing access by coordinating
with their battalion's maintenance
team and following the necessary procedures.2
The first time looking at an ESR can be
daunting—it may feel like a foreign language
that platoon leaders are expected
to understand immediately. However,
once the headings on the ESR are
understood and their corresponding
information is recognized, reading it
becomes much easier. The purpose of
the ESR is to provide a clear picture of
the status of a unit's equipment. If
there is an issue with a piece of equipment,
it must be reflected on the ESR.
Additionally, a fault must be listed on
the ESR to order a part for it. The ESR
serves as an essential system of record,
enabling a platoon leader to hold
themselves and their battalion's maintenance
enterprise accountable.
Each ESR page features four headlining
rows at the top, distinguished by progressively
smaller font sizes in descending
order, as seen in Figure 1.
Of all the details on an ESR, there are
a few that matter to platoon leaders
the most. Their definitions, and how
they can improve a maintenance program,
are described in Figures 2
through Figure 5. The first four pieces
of information are found in the second
headlining row.
Figure 2. This example ESR shows the key information from the 2nd headlining row. (U.S. Army Graphic)
Platoon Maintenance SOPs and Best Practices
With the maintenance knowledge I've
gained as a BMO, I often reflect on how
I could have run a more effective platoon
maintenance program. One of the
key improvements I would have made
is establishing structured maintenance
SOPs, including weekly maintenance
battle rhythm events, such as command
maintenance days and platoon
maintenance meetings.
Most platoons already participate in
command maintenance days, often referred
to as “Motor Pool Monday”, but
these events could be more efficient
and impactful. As a mechanized infantry
platoon leader, I frequently had my
mounted sections conducting preventative
maintenance checks and services
(PMCS) on our M2A3 Bradley Fighting
Vehicles (BFVs), while my dismounts
often had little to do. I now understand
the critical importance of
conducting weekly ancillary equipment
maintenance by properly allocating
priorities and manpower.
At a minimum, companies should prioritize
ancillary equipment maintenance
on a rotational basis. This can be
achieved by platoon leaders working
with the Company XO to create a
four-week maintenance schedule, dedicating
each week to a specific category
of ancillary equipment:4
-
Communications Equipment (e.g.,radios and Joint Battle Command-Platforms [JBC-Ps])
-
Weapons Systems
-
Night Vision Devices (NVDs)
-
All Other Platoon Equipment
During periods of increased manning,
this schedule can be condensed, allowing
more equipment to undergo PMCS
each week. By proactively maintaining
ancillary equipment, potential issues
can be identified and resolved before
field operations. Conducting after-operations
PMCS for the first time postfield
exercise is too late—preventative
maintenance must be consistent and
systematic to ensure operational readiness.
Communications equipment should be
tested weekly through communications
exercises (COMMEX) using radios
and JBC-Ps. Even if higher headquarters
does not mandate a weekly COMMEX,
platoons should conduct them
internally. The company communications
representative can fill these systems,
enabling platoons to conduct internal
checks. Many units, including
the 1st Cavalry Division, may already
require a weekly COMMEX, making it
essential to meet the commander's intent.
Platoon maintenance meetings should
be a weekly battle rhythm event. In 1-8
CAV, maintenance meetings are held at
both the battalion and company levels,
but they rely on information reported
up from the platoons. Conducting platoon-
level maintenance meetings fosters
a shared understanding among the
leadership and ensures platoon leaders
are well-prepared to provide accurate
briefings.
Figure 3. This example ESR shows the key information from the 3rd headlining row. (U.S. Army Graphic)
Platoon maintenance meetings should
cover several key agenda items, with a
primary focus on reviewing the ESR
line by line. The platoon leader should
facilitate the discussion, while section
and squad leaders brief the faults for
their assigned equipment. It is essential
that platoon, section, and squad
leaders understand the statuses of
their equipment. Additionally, the radio-
telephone operator (RTO) and armorer
should assist in briefing the status
of communications equipment and
weapons. Ideally, all soldiers would be
proficient in reading the ESR, but at a
minimum, the platoon's leadership,
RTO, and armorer must be well-versed
in it. When time allows, platoons
should review the “wide open” ESR,
which includes both deadline and nondeadline
faults. Overemphasis on the
NMC ESR often leads to neglecting
slash faults, which can escalate into
more severe equipment issues. The
“wide open” ESR also provides visibility
on open work orders, such as pending
welding jobs, allowing soldiers to
track ongoing repairs for their equipment.
Services
Vehicle and equipment services should
be another key agenda item in platoon
maintenance meetings. Platoon leadership
must understand the service
schedule for each piece of equipment
to prevent overdue services, as overdue
equipment cannot be used until
serviced.
Service plans consist of three key
dates:
-
Early Date – The earliest allowable
completion date.
-
Planned Date – The scheduled service
date in GCSS-Army.
-
Late Date – The latest allowable
completion date before the
equipment becomes delinquent.
The early and late dates represent a
10% variance window before and after
the planned date in which the service
must be completed. Completing a service
before the early date can disrupt
future service schedules by shifting
them forward. Missing the late date
results in delinquency without shifting
the future service windows. Platoon
leadership must also understand the
steps involved in a service to track
progress effectively. Battalion and
company commanders may inquire
about equipment status, and platoon
leaders should be prepared to provide
accurate updates.
Dispatches
Before a vehicle leaves the motor pool,
it must be properly dispatched. Tracking
open and overdue dispatches in
platoon maintenance meetings ensures
compliance and prevents unauthorized
vehicle use. Dispatches serve
as a commander's tool to verify vehicles
are FMC and maintain accountability
for equipment assigned to different
missions. Platoon leaders must ensure
their crews process dispatches through
the FMT clerk before vehicle use and
properly close them upon mission
completion. If a mission extends beyond
the original dispatch window, the
current dispatch must be closed, and a
new dispatch packet must be completed
in accordance with the unit's dispatch
SOP. To maintain accurate
mileage records and prevent premature
service triggers, soldiers should
only approach the clerk to close a dispatch
after recording the correct mileage
in the dispatch book. This step ensures
accurate mileage tracking under
optimized service plans.
Figure 4. This example ESR shows the key information from the 4th headlining row. (U.S. Army Graphic)
Army units often require 10-mile road
marches for each vehicle quarterly.
This road march can be done in conjunction
with training events as long as
at least 10 miles are driven during the
duration of the event. Some battalions
prefer to make these road marches
battle rhythm events on the calendar,
whereas others leave it up to the companies
and platoons. 1-8 CAV does not
make it a battle rhythm event, but we
track company adherence to this policy
by including usage reports in our
battalion maintenance meetings. As a
trickle-down effect, our companies
have included these reports in their
company maintenance meetings. Usage
reports can be pulled from GCSSArmy,
and they are systems of record
that display the distances travelled by
vehicles during a selected period. This
mileage is tracked by the change in
odometer readings between dispatches,
therefore making accurate mileage
reporting extremely important when
opening and closing dispatches.
Two other important metrics that
should be tracked in platoon maintenance
meetings are the Army Oil Analysis
Program (AOAP) and test, measure,
and diagnostic equipment
(TMDE). AOAP monitors petroleum, oil,
and lubricant (POL) samples to ensure
vehicle health and identify engine,
transmission, gearbox, or hydraulic
failures before they occur8. Samples
must be drawn and submitted at intervals
prescribed by the AOAP lab and
submitted for testing. The company XO
can pull AOAP due dates from a program
called the Army Enterprise Systems
Integration Program (AESIP) for
the platoon leader to include in their
platoon maintenance meetings. TMDE
is a list of parts, tools, and equipment
that need to be calibrated at specific
intervals to ensure they are accurate
and effective9. Most of these items are
owned at the company level, but some
platoon equipment may need calibration.
A platoon leader should confirm
if any of their sub-hand receipt (SHR)
is enrolled in TMDE and include their
service dates in their platoon's slides.
Another SOP that units should establish
is Class IX (CL IX) management. CL
IX is the Army's class of supply for repair
parts. CL IX management is often
done at the battalion and company levels,
but it should be done at the platoon
level as well. For example, Combat
Company, 1-8 CAV, dictated that
only platoon leaders and platoon sergeants
could sign for CL IX from the
FMT non-commissioned officer in
charge (NCOIC). This was to maintain
better accountability of parts and ensure
they were issued to the right vehicle.
If a part was installed on the
wrong vehicle, then the vehicle needing
the part wasted a lot of time on the
ESR. If the company does not have an
SOP, then the platoon should establish
one. Will only the platoon leader or
platoon sergeant be able to sign for CL
IX? Will section leaders be allowed to
do it? My recommendation is that only
the platoon leader and platoon sergeant
sign for parts. This allows for
better awareness and accountability
within the platoon's maintenance program.
Figure 5. This example ESR shows additional key information from the 4th headlining row. (U.S. Army
Graphic)
Allowing the platoon's soldiers to sign
for parts makes CL IX management
more difficult for the entire company.
Crews may not know if the part they
need was ordered for another vehicle.
Additionally, when CL IX is issued for a
vehicle, it needs to be installed immediately
to fix the fault. If it is operatorlevel
maintenance (maintenance that
can be conducted per the 10-level
technical manual [TM]), then members
of the crew can apply the part. If it is
mechanic-level maintenance (maintenance
conducted per the 20-level TM),
then a mechanic needs to hang the
part. If a parts manual is available for
that piece of equipment, then the
source, maintenance, and recoverability
(SMR) code can be checked in the
maintenance allocation chart (MAC) to
see who installs it. The SMR code has
five characters. The third character,
which is the maintenance code, identifies
the maintenance level for replacement.
A maintenance code of ‘C'
means a crew or operator can replace
the part, and a maintenance code of ‘F'
means unit-level maintainers can replace
the part. Sometimes ‘O' is listed
in place of ‘F' in older MACs.7
Whenever a part is hung by a mechanic,
whether in shop or on the motor
pool line, a member of that vehicle's
crew needs to be present.
An important maintenance SOP affecting
unit lethality is 24-hour maintenance
when pacing equipment parts
are received for deadline faults. If a
part arrives that would make a pacing
vehicle (commonly called a pacer)
FMC, then continuous work needs to
occur to make it happen. Maintenance
will occur until the part is hung and the
fault is fixed. The purpose is to remove
the amount of time a pacer is on the
ESR, and it helps improve the battalion's
operational readiness.
Unusable, recoverable parts removed
from equipment join the overage repairable
items list (ORIL). These parts
need to be returned to the Army so
they can be repaired and issued back
out to the force. Units receive monetary
credit back for parts turned in.
ORILs are monitored at the battalion
and brigade level, and poor management
of these parts can cause a unit's
ORIL to be extremely long. Operators
need to clean the parts and give them
to their FMT clerks for turn-in. Platoon
leaders should work with their Company
XO to get a list of platoon ORILs to
be tracked internally.
Field Maintenance
Field maintenance is probably one of
the most overlooked aspects in maintenance.
Soldiers tend to forget or
avoid it until their equipment breaks.
Field maintenance is often equated to
cleaning weapons in the field, but it is
so much more than that. Soldiers need
to PMCS their equipment in the field
daily. According to Army Regulation
(AR) 25-30 Army Publishing Program,
each piece of equipment is supposed
to be accompanied by a TM.8 When a
Soldier draws a piece of equipment,
they should draw the TM as well. TMs
should remain in vehicles too. While
the Army is beginning to modernize
with all-in-one tablets that include
both the TM and Department of the
Army (DA) Form 5988-E, it is a good
practice to maintain a paper copy of
the TM in the vehicle. As long as those
copies aren't lost or destroyed, paper
TMs are a great contingency for when
tablets break or run out of battery.
“Whenever a part is hung by a mechanic, whether in the shop or on the motor pool line, a member
of that vehicle's crew needs to be present.”
- 1LT Christian Arnette
There are three types of PMCS: before,
during and after operations.9 At a
minimum,
the during operations PMCS
should be completed in the field daily.
This will help crews identify problems
before they become significant, and it
gives the FMT a chance to fix them before
more intensive maintenance is required.
Printing capabilities are usually extremely
limited in the field. Therefore,
platoon leaders should ask their XOs to
bring several DA Form 5988-Es for each
vehicle prior to starting a field problem.
If printing is an option, XOs can
ask for the forms in their daily logistics
package (LOGPAC) requests. Soldiers
should complete PMCS of their vehicles
and equipment on these 5988s
daily. Leaders throughout the platoon
should spot check the accuracy of the
PMCS, then they should be submitted
to the XO. Conducting continuous field
PMCS will allow both the FMT and the
battalion's maintenance enterprise to
stay up to date on all maintenance issues
within the unit.
Final Notes
A platoon leader should make it their
priority to establish good relationships
with their Company's mechanics. They
are the ones that keep the vehicles in
the fight and their job is challenging.
There are long hours, lots of physical
work, and rarely any downtime. A platoon
leader also needs to allow the
FMT time to PMCS and maintain their
own assigned vehicles. An FMT's efficacy
relies heavily upon its vehicles' capabilities.
If their M88 is NMC, they are
unable to recover tracked vehicles. If
their palletized load system (PLS) is
down, they will be unable to bring
their forward repair system (FRS) and
field pack-up (FPU) container (also
known as a BOH, after the company
that makes them), into the fight. While
it is important for a platoon to have
faults verified and fixed promptly, time
needs to be given to the FMT to do the
same thing.
Maintenance can be an intimidating
aspect of the Army to all leaders, but
it is especially nerve-racking for new
platoon leaders. If the proper focus
and dedication is given to maintenance,
it isn't that scary. As a BMO, I
believe that while maintenance perfection
is impossible, an effective maintenance
program is extremely achievable.
To build an effective program at
the platoon level, a platoon leader
must study the ESR, ask maintenance
questions to anyone who will listen,
and be present in the motor pool.
Units with effective maintenance programs,
regardless of the echelon, are
the most lethal. Lethality is like a house
– training is the structure that builds
lethality, but maintenance is the foundation
on which it stands on. The
house cannot last if there is no foundation.
7.
Army Techniques Publications 4-33,
Maintenance Operations, 09 January
2024, appendix C
8.
Army Regulation 25-30, Army Publishing
Program, 14 June 2021, paragraph 1-28
9.
Army Regulation 750-1, Army Materiel
Maintenance Policy, 02 February 2023
Author
Christian Arnett is a First Lieutenant
currently serving as Executive Officer
of a Military Intelligence Company
within the Regimental Military Intelligence
Battalion, 75th Ranger Regiment.
Previous assignments include
Battalion Maintenance Officer for 1st
Battalion, 8th Cavalry Regiment, 2nd
Armored Brigade Combat Team, 1st
Cavalry Division, and Infantry Platoon
Leader for C Company, 1st Battalion,
8th Cavalry Regiment, 2nd Armored
Brigade Combat Team, 1st Cavalry Division.
His military education includes
Ranger School, Basic Airborne Course,
Bradley Leader's Course, and Infantry
Basic Officer Leader Course, all completed
at Fort Benning, Georgia. Arnett
holds a Bachelor of Science in environmental
engineering from the University
of Iowa.