Closing the Digital Readiness Gap

A Case for an Integrated Signal Training Ecosystem

By U.S. Army Signal School

Article published on: in the Spring 2026 of Army Communicator

Read Time: < 6 mins

Two U.S. Army Soldiers in camouflage uniforms — identified by name tapes as Travis and Davis — review a PEO C3N system diagram together at a workstation equipped with networking hardware and cables during a Signal training exercise.

As the U.S. Army pivots from a counterinsurgency (COIN) footing to readiness for large-scale combat operations (LSCO), it faces a critical digital training readiness gap. Recent trend reports from combat training centers (CTC) indicate that signal Soldiers – while technically proficient in specific systems – often lack the adaptive, high-level expertise required for complex, contested environments.

This article argues that the current "one-time" institutional training model is insufficient. The solution is not to invent new programs but to fully resource and strategically integrate existing structures into a holistic training ecosystem. We propose a two-pronged approach. First, transform Regional Signal Training Sites (RSTS) into a "Signal Foundry" modeled after the successful Intelligence Foundry program. Second, empower the Signal Digital Master Gunner (S-DMG) as the master trainer and commander’s advisor for network readiness. By bridging the institutional and operational training domains, this integrated system will build and sustain the digital expertise necessary for victory on future battlefields.

Introduction: A Crisis in Digital Readiness

The modern command post is a nexus of information where commanders must synthesize data from myriad sources to make time-sensitive decisions. However, the most advanced technology is rendered useless if the network supporting it fails and the personnel responsible for it lack the training to restore it under pressure. This scenario represents not merely a technical failure but a critical failure in training readiness.

Recent reports from the Army's CTCs offer a stark warning, noting that the force is at risk of producing "expert technicians who are novice warfighters."2 This critique highlights a fundamental problem: Soldiers may be trained on the procedural "button-ology" of specific systems but lack the deep, adaptive knowledge to troubleshoot and integrate capabilities in a contested operational environment. This reality violates the Army’s foundational training principle that a single, all-encompassing standard must apply in both peacetime and wartime.3 A single course at the beginning of a career is insufficient to maintain expertise throughout. To remedy this, the Army must bridge the gap between institutional instruction and operational training needs through a system of continuous development.

The Shifting Operational Landscape: From COIN to LSCO

The Army's strategic transformation from a COIN focus to a readiness posture for LSCO has profound implications for the Signal Corps. The COIN era was characterized by relatively stable network environments, system-specific procedures for Programs of Record like the Warfighter Information Network-Tactical (WIN-T), and a heavy reliance on field service representatives for advanced troubleshooting and maintenance.

The LSCO environment, in contrast, demands that signal Soldiers be more than technicians. They must be adaptive problem solvers capable of integrating new technologies, defending the network against peer adversaries, and operating effectively at the tactical edge with limited external support. Possessing cutting-edge technology is not enough. Without "the right digital skills to optimize, adapt, and fully apply the technology through innovation,"6 operational units will remain at a disadvantage. While the U.S. Army Signal School has begun updating its Programs of Instruction (POI), institutional training alone cannot solve this readiness problem. The solution must extend to the home station, empowering units to build and sustain digital proficiency.

A U.S. Army Soldier in camouflage uniform consults a PEO C3N wiring diagram while connecting cables to a rack-mounted tactical communications system during a hands-on Signal training exercise

A Holistic Solution: The Signal Foundry and the Master Gunner

To close the digital readiness gap, the Signal Corps can implement a nested, multi-echelon training ecosystem built on two key initiatives that are already in motion but require full resourcing and strategic integration.

1. Signal Foundry: Resourcing Home-Station Training

The Intelligence community provides an excellent model for resourced, continuous home-station training with its Foundry program. As outlined in Army Regulation 350-32, the Foundry platform provides expert-level training on advanced systems at the local level. We propose remodeling the existing RSTS to align with this resourcing model, creating a "Signal Foundry." This mechanism would leverage centralized resourcing to disseminate best practices and lessons learned across the force while empowering local commanders to tailor training to their unit's specific mission and equipment. A Signal Foundry would provide the dedicated environment for noncommissioned officers (NCOs) and Soldiers to move beyond basic proficiency and achieve true mastery of next-generation digital systems.

2. Signal Digital Master Gunner (S-DMG): The Tactical Expert and Trainer

The second, and most critical, component is the redesign of the S-DMG course. Modeled on the venerable M1 Abrams Master Gunner course, the new S-DMG curriculum correctly treats the network as a weapon platform, and the electromagnetic spectrum as its operational terrain. The goal of this course is to produce NCOs with advanced technical expertise who can serve as primary trainers within their formation and act as the commander's most trusted advisor on the unit's network and communication systems’ readiness. The S-DMG is the linchpin of the entire ecosystem – the tactical-level expert who can leverage the Signal Foundry to build and sustain the formation's digital warfighting capability. This aligns directly with the mandate in AR 350-1, Army Training and Leader Development, to develop leaders who can "operate and succeed in the complex and uncertain operational environments of the 21st century.”5

Way Forward: A Call to Integrate and Empower

This is not a proposal to create new, costly programs from scratch. It is a call to fully resource and strategically integrate initiatives the Signal School is already developing. The path forward is clear: If the Army is serious about fixing its digital training readiness, it must invest in a robust digital training ecosystem.

The recommendations are straightforward. Fully resource the modernization of all relevant POIs, with special emphasis on the S-DMG course, to develop the master trainers required at the tactical edge. Transform the existing RSTS program into a Signal Foundry, providing dedicated resources for continuous, integrated training that closes the gap between the institutional schoolhouse and the operational force.

The CTCs have identified the problem, and the Signal School is actively building the multi-layered solution. By emulating the success of the Intelligence Foundry and empowering the S-DMG as the central figure in unit training, the Army can ensure its digital dominance on the battlefields of tomorrow.

Notes

1. Headquarters, Department of the Army, Army Regulation (AR) 600-20, Army Command Policy (Washington, D.C.: HQDA, 24 July 2020), para. 2-18c.

2. Center for Army Lessons Learned, FY25 CTC Trends (Fort Leavenworth, KS: CALL, March 2026), 1-2.

3. Headquarters, Department of the Army, Army Doctrine Publication (ADP) 7-0, Training (Washington, D.C.: HQDA, July 2019), para. 4-38.

4. Headquarters, U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC), TRADOC Regulation 350-71, Army Training and Education Development (Fort Eustis, VA: TRADOC, 9 January 2024), F-1.a.

5. Headquarters, Department of the Army, Army Regulation (AR) 350-1, Army Training and Leader Development (Washington, D.C.: HQDA, 10 December 2017), para. 1-13a.

6. Headquarters, Department of the Army, The Army Digital Transformation Strategy (Washington, D.C.: HQDA, 2021), 14.

Authors

Dr. David Verret is a leading expert in U.S. Army information systems and communications with over 35 years of distinguished Department of Defense service. He currently serves as the chief of the Regional Signal Training Sites and Signal Mobile Advanced Readiness Training. His career includes multiple combat-era deployments to Kuwait and Afghanistan in key G-6 and S-6 leadership roles. Dr. Verret holds a Doctor of Science in Information Systems and Communications from Robert Morris University, complemented by advanced degrees in Information Technology Management and Electronic Systems Technologies. A published author and adjunct professor, he is a recognized authority on capability development and end-user experience in military communication systems.

Col. Ben Schneller is the assistant commandant of the U.S. Army Signal School. He has served in a variety command and staff positions and across multiple deployments. Schneller recently completed a U.S. Army War College Fellowship at the Syracuse University Institute for Security Policy and Law.