NGC2: Establishing a Mindset for the Next Fight
Decision dominance
By Command Sgt. Maj. Tasha J. Wright, U.S. Army Information Systems Engineering Command
Article published on: September 1, 2025 in the Army Communicator Fall/Winter 2025 Edition
Read Time: < 6 mins
The first warning wasn’t an explosion or a barrage of rockets – it was silence. Inside the brigade’s tactical
operations center, the hum of screens and steady chat-ter of data feeds faltered. The live drone video froze
mid-frame; a convoy of vehicles blurred in gray static. Red icons scattered across the common operating picture
like a spreading rash: “NO DATA,” “LINK LOST,” “AUTH FAIL.”
Outside, maneuver companies were pushing into a contested zone, relying on those feeds for targeting and
movement. A young sergeant in the signal section did-n’t wait for orders. He pulled up alternative transport
options, rerouted key data packets through a mesh of vehicles on the edge of the formation, and manually
authenticated sensor reports to weed out spoofed signals slipping in from the enemy. The fix wasn’t perfect –
bandwidth dropped, video resolution degraded, and latency lagged. But it was enough. The commander received the
fire mission request in time, and friendly forces pressed forward.
What made the difference that day wasn’t a shiny new piece of hardware or a flawless network; it was mindset. A
Signaleer trained to expect disruption, think critically under pressure, and improvise solutions in the chaos of
modern war. This kind of adaptability, resilience, and technical fluency is precisely what the Army envisions in
Next Generation Command and Control (NGC2).
Defining NGC2 as a Mindset
When Soldiers hear “Next Generation Command and Control,” the first image that comes to mind is often equipment:
sleek terminals, resilient networks, or AI-driven dashboards. Those technologies are essential, but they are
only part of the story. NGC2 is not just a kit we wait to receive; it is a mindset we must develop (U.S. Army,
2024). At its core, NGC2 is about decision dominance: ensuring commanders can see, decide, and act faster than
any adversary, even in environments where communications are denied, de-graded, intermittent, or limited (DDIL).
Achieving that dominance requires more than advanced systems; it requires Soldiers who are trained to think
critically, operate under stress, and adapt when systems inevitably fail (Rand Corporation, 2023). For the
Signal Corps, this means a cultural shift. In the past, success was often measured by whether “the radios stayed
green” or the network remained up. In the future fight, success will be measured by whether commanders had the
right information, at the right time, to make decisions that shaped the battlefield. That shift elevates the
Signaleer’s role from system operator to decision enabler – professionals who bridge the gap between raw data
and actionable insight (War on the Rocks, 2025).
Skills and Training Signaleers Need Now
If NGC2 is a mindset, then the question becomes: “What must today’s Signal Soldiers practice now to be ready for
tomorrow’s fight?” The answer lies in three broad skill areas: technical fluency, cognitive agility, and
collaborative leadership.
Technical Fluency Beyond Radios
Tomorrow’s networks will be dynamic ecosystems connecting satellites, line-of-sight radios, cloud ser-vices, and
edge devices. Signaleers need fluency in how these systems interconnect, how data moves, and how to protect that
flow from attack or corruption.
Cybersecurity discipline, an understanding of application programming interfaces (APIs), and familiarity with
data visualization tools will be as important as knowing how to configure a radio or lay cable. In NGC2, every
Soldier is also a steward of the data itself (Alhassan et al., 2022).
Cognitive Agility Under Pressure
The modern battlefield is not neat or predictable. Enemy electronic warfare, cyber intrusions, and physical
threats will constantly contest our ability to communicate. Soldiers must be trained to expect disruption and
thrive in it. That means building comfort with incomplete information, developing the ability to make rapid
assessments under stress, and balancing trust in automated tools with sound human judgment (RAND, 2023).
Collaborative Leadership Across MOSs
Perhaps the most underappreciated skill for the NGC2 era is the ability to collaborate and translate across
warfighting functions. Signaleers must be able to explain the operational impact of technical issues to maneuver
leaders, coordinate with intelligence and cyber teams on data integration, and work with sustain-ers to ensure
the resilience of command posts in austere conditions. This requires communication skills, mission command
discipline, and the confidence to step into the role of integrators, not just maintainers (Edmondson, 1999).
Training and Tools to Build the Mindset
Skills don’t develop by chance; they are forged through intentional training, deliberate practice, and the right
tools. Preparing for NGC2 means shifting how we train today, ensuring Soldiers are ready to operate in
tomorrow’s contested and data-rich environments.
Simulations That Embrace Failure
Training environments often assume systems work perfectly. To prepare for NGC2, we must design simulations where
systems fail by design: comms drop, feeds are spoofed, latency creeps in, or networks are jammed. These
scenarios force Soldiers to practice resilience, improvisation, and quick decision-making.
Cross-MOS Training and Exchanges
NGC2 is not the sole responsibility of the Signal Corps; it is the connective tissue between every warfighting
function. Cross-training with maneuver, intelligence, fires, and sustainment units builds shared understanding
of how information flows across the battlefield.
Digital Literacy and Data Stewardship
As data becomes the lifeblood of C2, Soldiers must become comfortable reading dashboards, interpreting
visualizations, and spotting anomalies in real-time. Even basic exposure to data analysis and visualization
tools can give a young sergeant or specialist the confidence to support commanders with insight, not just
connectivity (Alhassan et al., 2022).
Leader Development for Integration
Leader development programs must encourage signal leaders to see themselves as integrators, not just maintainers.
That means practicing communication with non-technical leaders, framing technical problems in operational terms,
and fostering initiative when technology lags behind the fight (War on the Rocks, 2025).
Risks, Counterpoints, and Challenges
As the Army pushes toward NGC2, it is tempting to view the future as a smooth path paved by new technology. But
every advance comes with friction, and every system has vulnerabilities. To prepare realistically, the Signal
Corps must acknowledge the risks alongside the opportunities.
- Overreliance on technology. The same systems that promise faster decision-making also
create the danger of dependency. Commanders must retain initiative when technology falters.
- Pace of change versus training pipelines. Technology often moves faster than institutional
training. Adaptive, decentralized learning models will be critical.
- Cultural resistance. For decades, signal success was measured by “green” status icons. The
shift to measuring success by decision quality will take a deliberate cultural change across the Signal
Regiment. By facing these risks honestly, the Signal Regiment can prevent overconfidence, close
vulnerabilities, and adapt faster than adversaries who face similar challenges.
Call to Action: Owning the NGC2 Mindset
The future of C2 will not be written by machines or software alone; it will be written by Soldiers who know how
to think, adapt, and lead in the chaos of modern war. NGC2 is more than a modernization program; it is a call to
the Signal Corps to prepare now for the demands of tomorrow.
Every Signaleer, from private to senior leader, has a role to play. Practicing degraded communications, building
digital literacy, and learning to translate technical issues into operational impacts are not abstract goals;
they are daily disciplines that sharpen readiness. Just as importantly, leaders must mentor their formations to
see themselves not only as system operators, but as decision enablers who hold the keys to decision dominance.
The fight ahead will be faster, more contested, and more data-driven than any we have faced before. The Army will
field new systems, but it is the mindset that will decide whether those systems are decisive or brittle. The
Signaleers who can anticipate disruption, think critically under stress, and integrate seamlessly with other
warfighting functions will be the ones who ensure commanders never lose the ability to command and control.
NGC2 is not waiting for us on some future fielding date. It is already here – in how we train, how we lead, and
how we choose to prepare today. The question is not whether the Army will have the right equipment. The question
is whether we, as Signaleers, will have the right mindset to use it.
Notes
1. Alhassan, I., Sammon, D., & Daly, M. (2022). Data governance for analytics and decision-making:
Establish-ing a framework. Information Systems Management, 39(3), 256–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2021.1990599
2. Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative
Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
3. RAND Corporation. (2023). Command and Control in the Future: Concept Paper 3. RAND Corporation.
https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA2476-3.html
4. U.S. Army. (2024, Jan). Next Generation Command and Control (NGC2) becomes official program office at
PEO C3T. Army.mil. https://www.army.mil/article/284669
War on the Rocks. (2025, June). How the Army is putting the commander back in command and control.
War on the Rocks. https://warontherocks.com/2025/06/how-the-army-is-putting-the-commander-back-in-command-and-control/