Intelligence at the Point of Arrival
66th Military Intelligence Brigade‑Theater Reception, Staging, Onward Movement, and Integration Operations in
Europe
By LTC Joe Henderson
Article published on: February 27, 2026 in the January-June 2026 edition of Military
Intelligence
Read Time: < 11 mins
Historical Context
Reception, staging, onward movement, and integration (RSOI) “is the process that delivers combat power to the
JFC [joint force commander] in the operational theater... Siezing the initiative demands prompt processing of
personnel and equipment throughout the deployment process... Effective RSOI matches personnel with their
equipment, minimizing staging and sustainment requirements.”1 While always a deliberate operation, RSOI takes on many forms depending on the units
involved, the time available, and when forces arrive on the competition continuum. Successful RSOI operations
are as diverse as Great Britain before the D-Day invasion in World War II, Saudi Arabia during Operation Desert
Storm, and, more recently, Camp Buehring, Kuwait, during Operation Iraqi Freedom. Regardless of the
circumstances, the Theater Army must welcome and prepare units for their mission, a process that can take months
to develop and years to refine. Having supported over 50 divisions in Europe during World War II, the U.S. Army
Europe and Africa (USAREUR-AF) now needs to relearn those same RSOI lessons 75 years later.
After the Russian Invasion of Crimea in 2014, the United States deployed forces to Europe as part of Operation
Atlantic Resolve, the largest deployment of combat troops to Europe since the last REFORGER (Return of Forces to
Germany) exercise in 1993.2 This rotation of
forces signaled what was to come, and in February 2022, with the impending Russian invasion of Ukraine, the need
to receive units immediately into theater became critical. Pressed for time and operating in a
resource-constrained environment, USAREUR-AF formulated a do-it-all RSOI solution with limited help from the
wider Army or joint enterprise.
Current Operational Landscape
While the Army and USAREUR-AF headquarters leaned on many units in the theater to contribute to the RSOI
process, support for the intelligence warfighting function fell mainly to the 66th Military Intelligence
Brigade–Theater (MIB-T). Established in its current form in 2009,3 the 66th MIB-T “serves as the theater level intelligence focal point... for deploying
forces. It maintains a regional intelligence architecture that deploying and theater-aligned units can access...
and main tains a valuable database of intelligence regarding persons of interest and the evolving doctrine and
capabilities of regional military forces.”4
Core Tasks and Lines of Effort
The 66th MIB-T is uniquely positioned to support RSOI and set the theater, as outlined in Field Manual 2-0,
Intelligence. In fact, six of the seven MIB-T core tasks described in the field manual focus on
theater-setting and RSOI for deploying intelligence units.5 With this doctrinal focus as a guiding handrail, the 66th MIB-T and the USAREUR-AF G-2
grouped their responsibilities into six lines of effort: planning and coordination, theater-specific training,
foundry support, intelligence architecture, authorities, and key relationships.
Planning and coordination. The first step in getting a unit successfully into the theater is
long-range planning and continued engagement. While not always possible in times of crisis, 66th MIB-T planners
adopted a steady-state model to support the deployment of regionally aligned forces; exercise participants;
smaller, tailored, operationally controlled forces; and contingency and crisis response forces. In conjunction
with USAREUR-AF G-2 and V Corps G-2, 66th MIB-T conducts the initial pre-deployment in-briefing with incoming
units no earlier than 180 days before a unit’s ordered latest arrival date. Planners and intelligence subject
matter experts provide classified intelligence assessments of threats in the area of operations and confirm that
incoming units have access to all intelligence reporting repositories, the RSOI content repository on Microsoft
SharePoint, and the theater common intelligence picture. These up-front efforts ensure that deploying units are
trained in their theater responsibilities and know whom to contact for help over the coming months. Intelligence
planners conduct weekly check-ins with deployed forces, monitor training progress, and proactively address any
concerns. Planners additionally review draft theater intelligence requirements and tasks to intelligence units
for publication in the USAREUR-AF campaign order’s fragmentary order.
Theater-specific training. Following the initial in-briefing, units’ focus for the next six
months will be on identifying and completing necessary theater-specific training. While most units understand
the basic requirements for a deployment, they need to focus on completing unique mission-or theater-specific
intelligence training requirements. These requirements are specific to the Soldiers’ military occupational
specialty, the position they will fill (such as collection manager or embedded analyst), or the way USAREUR-AF
will employ the entire unit. These requirements continue to grow as analysts in theater develop new tactics,
techniques, and procedures and standard operating procedures and eventually include rotational units providing
federated support to USAREUR-AF missions from home station. The 66th MIB-T created an RSOI content repository on
Microsoft SharePoint to capture all these requirements, including supporting documents and helpful points of
contact, enabling deploying units to understand and track them throughout the process.
USAREUR-AF theater-specific training also includes establishing accounts and initial instruction on the use of
the Army Intelligence Data Platform (AIDP). As an early adopter of the platform, 66th MIB-T and the USAREUR-AF
analysis and control element use AIDP to maintain the theater ground common intelligence picture. “AIDP sets the
foundation for future technology integration... and allows for better, more responsive handling of information
during multi-domain operations because it is always gathering and processing data. As a cloud-based intel
solution, multiple users, from multiple different regions of the world, can access AIDP simultaneously... in the
Army Intel Cloud environment.”6 Because most
deploying units are completely unfamiliar with the new system, 66th MIB-T trainers provide a roadshow exhibition
for intelligence leaders and a week-long analyst training overview. These courses enable deploying units to
achieve an initial operational capability on the system, and Soldiers develop their proficiency by working with
AIDP daily. USAREUR-AF G-2 leaders travel to unit outstations to monitor adoption timelines, and the 66th MIB-T
hosts yearly conferences to exchange ideas and develop AIDP tactics, techniques, and procedures across all U.S.
European Command’s component intelligence directorates.
Foundry support. Most deploying units accomplish required training through the Army Foundry
Intelligence Training Program. The Foundry Program enables Army intelligence personnel to train on intelligence
skills and receive certifications required to execute intelligence missions successfully.7 The 66th MIB-T European Foundry Platform coordinates with
deploying units’ home station Foundry platforms to facilitate pre-deployment training, ensuring the units have
the required training materials and facilities to train on basic intelligence skills and exquisite capabilities
their Soldiers will need in the European area of responsibility. If the unit is unable to complete the required
training at home station, the European Foundry Platform provides training at the forward location in
Grafenwoehr, Germany. Options include training entire formations at the European Foundry Platform, sending
qualified instructors to the unit’s deployed location, providing training via video teleconferencing, or hosting
individual Soldiers and teams for live environment training with 66th MIB-T analysts and collectors.
Intelligence architecture. None of this collaboration would be possible without a backbone of
network architecture provided by the 66th MIB-T’s technical support platoon and the USAREUR-AF G-26. Planners
and technical experts ensure that deploying units understand the theater architecture requirements and focus
their pre-deployment site surveys on understanding the specific networks and infrastructure available at each
forward location. Key to this process is understanding the connections to the wider intelligence architecture,
including NATO and bilateral allied networks through the Battlefield Information Collection and Exploitation
System and the USAREUR-AF theater-specific mission partner environment network.8 Additionally, the 66th MIB-T technical support platoon
facilitates military intelligence systems maintainer/integrator training; a black/red test and communications
exercise to validate equipment; and cross domain solution training for Army systems and tailored, accredited
USAREUR-AF cross domain solution systems and software.
Authorities. Simply being able to operate does not guarantee the necessary authorities, and
many rotational units discover they lack the permissions to achieve their objectives. Here, the 66th MIB-T
assists forces in navigating the bureaucracy of foreign nation partnerships or provides access to unique 66th
MIB-T theater-or U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM)-derived authorities. This includes
embedding counterintelligence (CI) agents and human intelligence collectors with forward-deployed 66th MIB-T
field offices to conduct force protection investigations and foreign military intelligence collection activities
(also known as FORMICA) debriefings, or using the 66th MIB-T as an INSCOM liaison to coordinate with the U.S.
Army CI Command for expanded CI authorities. Additionally, operating in the European theater is very different
from the familiarity most deploying forces have when operating in a declared theater of active armed conflict.
Arriving units must work through sovereign nations to gain concurrence or authorization to conduct operations
and training exercises, adding an unexpected layer of complexity. The 66th MIB-T eases this transition by
ensuring that deploying forces understand the relationships they will inherit with key partners, allies, and
agencies upon arrival in theater.
Key relationships. The 66th MIB-T and USAREUR-AF intelligence and security cooperation planners
maintain databases of theater-specific personalities, threats, agencies, and relationships. 66th MIB-T planners
connect deploying forces to these databases, allowing leaders to dialogue with portfolio subject matter experts
and to digest lessons learned from earlier unit deployments. These lessons learned include topics such as the
process for conducting foreign disclosure and intelligence sharing with partner nations and NATO countries,
existing plans and timelines for upcoming operational activities and exercises, cultural sensitization and
things to avoid, backgrounds on key leadership personalities and internal host nation relationships, and even
fun partnership event opportunities to build camaraderie. Deploying forces also receive briefings on host nation
support for services, supplies, and facilities.9 While most deploying units rotate into theater for 9 to 12 months, 66th MIB-T provides
the continuity and maintains relationships with countries and intelligence agencies over years and decades. Some
of the most fruitful and long-term partnerships are through the forward-stationed CI field offices that conduct
bilateral operations. They play an integral role in force protection operations by mitigating CI threats to
deploying forces.10
Working with partners and allies also requires deploying units to leverage the strengths of different
partnerships. Many NATO allies have significant expertise in areas where U.S. forces may be lacking, and host
nation intelligence professionals always have a better understanding of the threat in their area than rotational
forces. While national interests may not always align perfectly, gaining consensus is vital to ensuring all
sides benefit from combined operations and analysis. The 66th MIB-T fosters enduring cooperation by keeping
intelligence operations as simple as possible: limiting the use of acronyms, using common terms and procedures,
and relying on NATO doctrine whenever possible.
For all the success over the past two years, there is still room for improvement. The 66th MIB-T, V Corps, and
the USAREUR-AF G-2 team continue to revise processes, incorporating lessons learned from the deployment of
multiple corps, divisions, expeditionary-military intelligence brigades, and enablers that have supported the
Ukrainian crisis. One notable area for necessary improvement is a deeper integration of NATO allies into all
aspects of the intelligence war-fighting function. The U.S. Army must develop a culture of intelligence sharing
and overcome the default “no foreign nationals” (more commonly known as NOFORN) dissemination control mindset.
Fully integrating allies into operations is a formidable problem. The difficulties experienced by the 66th MIB-T
in 2024 are some of the same issues identified in 2020 by Major Chad Lorenz in his article “Setting the Theater:
Intelligence and Interoperability in DEFENDER-Europe 20,” namely: friendly collection operations, information
sharing through the mission partner environment, and provisioning of the INSCOM Cloud Initiative (a precursor to
AIDP).11 While the theater will always seek
to improve the integration of allies, the USAREUR-AF Commander, having assumed the dual role of commander of
NATO’s Allied Land Command (LANDCOM), presents a renewed opportunity to focus on interoperability. As LANDCOM
serves as the multi-corps land component command, the need to provide RSOI support to multinational corps and
divisions will require greater integration with allies across all phases of operations.12 In this regard, 66th MIB-T may have an easier time
integrating with NATO allies, as other theaters and MIB-Ts do not have the benefit of the overarching NATO
alliance to guide their missions.
Ensuring Future Success
The 66th Military Intelligence Brigade–Theater has proven indispensable in revitalizing the U.S. Army’s
intelligence RSOI capabilities in Europe. Facing the urgent demands of a new security landscape, the brigade
successfully established a robust framework across six key lines of effort—from initial planning and
theater-specific training to providing critical intelligence architecture and leveraging established
relationships. This comprehensive support ensures that deploying forces are not just present in the theater but
are immediately effective and integrated into the operational environment.
However, the mission is not without its challenges. The persistent need to deepen integration with NATO allies
and overcome institutional hurdles to information sharing remains a critical area for improvement. The future
success of collective defense in Europe hinges on transforming this challenge into a strength. As the 66th MIB-T
continues to refine its processes, its role in fostering true interoperability will be more vital than ever,
reinforcing the allied solidarity required to ensure a stable and secure Europe.
Endnotes
Notes
1. Department of the Army, Army Techniques Publication
(ATP) 3-35, Army Deployment and Redeployment (U.S. Government Publishing Office [GPO], 2023), 1-6.
2. “Our Support to Atlantic Resolve,” Atlantic Resolve,
U.S. Army Europe and Africa, https://www.europeafrica.army.mil/AtlanticResolve/.
3. “Our History,” Welcome to the 66th Brigade Public
Website, Major Subordinate Commands, U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command, https://www.usainscom.army.mil/MSCs/66th-MI/.
4. Department of the Army, Field Manual (FM) 3-0,
Operations (U.S. GPO, 2025), 98.
5. Department of the Army, FM 2-0, Intelligence
(U.S. GPO, 2023), 7-10.
6. Shawn Nesaw, “Cloud-Based Intel Tool AIDP Rolls Out to
Army Units Globally,” News, Capability Program Executive—Intelligence, Electronic Warfare & Sensors,
October 9, 2024, https://peoiews.army.mil/2024/10/09/277811/.
7. Department of the Army, Army Regulation 350-32, The
Army Foundry Intelligence Training Program (U.S. GPO, 2024), 1.
8. Department of the Army, FM 2-0, Intelligence,
7-14.
9. Department of the Army, ATP 3-35, Army Deployment
and Redeployment, 5-3—5-4.
10. Department of the Army, FM 2-0,
Intelligence, 7-11.
11. Chad R. Lorenz, “Setting the Theater: Intelligence
and Interoperability in DEFENDER-Europe 20,” Military Intelligence Professional Bulletin 46, no. 4:
83-86, https://mipb.ikn.army.mil/issues/oct-dec-2020/.
12. “Cooperative Security,” Military Partnership, About
Us, NATO Allied Land Command, https://lc.nato.int/operations/military-partnership/nato-partnership.
Authors
LTC Joe Henderson currently serves as the Director of Analysis for the Joint Interagency
Task Force—National Capital Region. He served as the brigade operations officer for the 66th Military
Intelligence Brigade—Theater from June 2022 through July 2024. He is a graduate of The Johns Hopkins
University, The University of Oklahoma, and the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College. He has deployed
multiple times with both conventional and special operations forces.