Intelligence at the Point of Arrival
66th Military Intelligence Brigade‑Theater Reception, Staging, Onward Movement, and Integration Operations
in Europe
By LTC Joe Henderson
Article published on: February 27, 2026 in the January-June 2026 edition of Military
Intelligence
Read Time: < 11 mins
Historical Context
Reception, staging, onward movement, and integration (RSOI) “is the process that delivers combat power to the
JFC [joint force commander] in the operational theater... Seizing the initiative demands prompt processing
of personnel and equipment throughout the deployment process... Effective RSOI matches personnel with their
equipment, minimizing staging and sustainment requirements.”1 While always a deliberate operation, RSOI takes on many forms depending on the
units involved, the time available, and when forces arrive on the competition continuum. Successful RSOI
operations are as diverse as Great Britain before the D-Day invasion in World War II, Saudi Arabia during
Operation Desert Storm, and, more recently, Camp Buehring, Kuwait, during Operation Iraqi Freedom.
Regardless of the circumstances, the Theater Army must welcome and prepare units for their mission, a
process that can take months to develop and years to refine. Having supported over 50 divisions in Europe
during World War II, the U.S. Army Europe and Africa (USAREUR-AF) now needs to relearn those same RSOI
lessons 75 years later.
After the Russian Invasion of Crimea in 2014, the United States deployed forces to Europe as part of
Operation Atlantic Resolve, the largest deployment of combat troops to Europe since the last REFORGER
(Return of Forces to Germany) exercise in 1993.2 This rotation of forces signaled what was to come, and in February 2022, with the
impending Russian invasion of Ukraine, the need to receive units immediately into theater became critical.
Pressed for time and operating in a resource-constrained environment, USAREUR-AF formulated a do-it-all RSOI
solution with limited help from the wider Army or joint enterprise.
Current Operational Landscape
While the Army and USAREUR-AF headquarters leaned on many units in the theater to contribute to the RSOI
process, support for the intelligence warfighting function fell mainly to the 66th Military Intelligence
Brigade–Theater (MIB-T). Established in its current form in 2009,3 the 66th MIB-T “serves as the theater level intelligence
focal point... for deploying forces. It maintains a regional intelligence architecture that deploying and
theater-aligned units can access... and maintains a valuable database of intelligence regarding persons of
interest and the evolving doctrine and capabilities of regional military forces.”4
Core Tasks and Lines of Effort
The 66th MIB-T is uniquely positioned to support RSOI and set the theater, as outlined in Field Manual 2-0,
Intelligence. In fact, six of the seven MIB-T core tasks described in the field manual focus on
theater-setting and RSOI for deploying intelligence units.5 With this doctrinal focus as a guiding handrail, the 66th MIB-T and the USAREUR-AF
G-2 grouped their responsibilities into six lines of effort: planning and coordination, theater-specific
training, foundry support, intelligence architecture, authorities, and key relationships.
Planning and coordination. The first step in getting a unit successfully into the theater is
long-range planning and continued engagement. While not always possible in times of crisis, 66th MIB-T
planners adopted a steady-state model to support the deployment of regionally aligned forces; exercise
participants; smaller, tailored, operationally controlled forces; and contingency and crisis response
forces. In conjunction with USAREUR-AF G-2 and V Corps G-2, 66th MIB-T conducts the initial pre-deployment
in-briefing with incoming units no earlier than 180 days before a unit’s ordered latest arrival date.
Planners and intelligence subject matter experts provide classified intelligence assessments of threats in
the area of operations and confirm that incoming units have access to all intelligence reporting
repositories, the RSOI content repository on Microsoft SharePoint, and the theater common intelligence
picture. These up-front efforts ensure that deploying units are trained in their theater responsibilities
and know whom to contact for help over the coming months. Intelligence planners conduct weekly check-ins
with deployed forces, monitor training progress, and proactively address any concerns. Planners additionally
review draft theater intelligence requirements and tasks to intelligence units for publication in the
USAREUR-AF campaign order’s fragmentary order.
Theater-specific training. Following the initial in-briefing, units’ focus for the next six
months will be on identifying and completing necessary theater-specific training. While most units
understand the basic requirements for a deployment, they need to focus on completing unique mission-or
theater-specific intelligence training requirements. These requirements are specific to the Soldiers’
military occupational specialty, the position they will fill (such as collection manager or embedded
analyst), or the way USAREUR-AF will employ the entire unit. These requirements continue to grow as analysts
in theater develop new tactics, techniques, and procedures and standard operating procedures and eventually
include rotational units providing federated support to USAREUR-AF missions from home station. The 66th
MIB-T created an RSOI content repository on Microsoft SharePoint to capture all these requirements,
including supporting documents and helpful points of contact, enabling deploying units to understand and
track them throughout the process.
USAREUR-AF theater-specific training also includes establishing accounts and initial instruction on the use
of the Army Intelligence Data Platform (AIDP). As an early adopter of the platform, 66th MIB-T and the
USAREUR-AF analysis and control element use AIDP to maintain the theater ground common intelligence picture.
“AIDP sets the foundation for future technology integration... and allows for better, more responsive
handling of information during multi-domain operations because it is always gathering and processing data.
As a cloud-based intel solution, multiple users, from multiple different regions of the world, can access
AIDP simultaneously... in the Army Intel Cloud environment.”6 Because most deploying units are completely unfamiliar with the new system, 66th
MIB-T trainers provide a roadshow exhibition for intelligence leaders and a week-long analyst training
overview. These courses enable deploying units to achieve an initial operational capability on the system,
and Soldiers develop their proficiency by working with AIDP daily. USAREUR-AF G-2 leaders travel to unit
outstations to monitor adoption timelines, and the 66th MIB-T hosts yearly conferences to exchange ideas and
develop AIDP tactics, techniques, and procedures across all U.S. European Command’s component intelligence
directorates.
Foundry support. Most deploying units accomplish required training through the Army Foundry
Intelligence Training Program. The Foundry Program enables Army intelligence personnel to train on
intelligence skills and receive certifications required to execute intelligence missions successfully.7 The 66th MIB-T European Foundry Platform
coordinates with deploying units’ home station Foundry platforms to facilitate pre-deployment training,
ensuring the units have the required training materials and facilities to train on basic intelligence skills
and exquisite capabilities their Soldiers will need in the European area of responsibility. If the unit is
unable to complete the required training at home station, the European Foundry Platform provides training at
the forward location in Grafenwoehr, Germany. Options include training entire formations at the European
Foundry Platform, sending qualified instructors to the unit’s deployed location, providing training via
video teleconferencing, or hosting individual Soldiers and teams for live environment training with 66th
MIB-T analysts and collectors.
Intelligence architecture. None of this collaboration would be possible without a backbone
of network architecture provided by the 66th MIB-T’s technical support platoon and the USAREUR-AF G-26.
Planners and technical experts ensure that deploying units understand the theater architecture requirements
and focus their pre-deployment site surveys on understanding the specific networks and infrastructure
available at each forward location. Key to this process is understanding the connections to the wider
intelligence architecture, including NATO and bilateral allied networks through the Battlefield Information
Collection and Exploitation System and the USAREUR-AF theater-specific mission partner environment
network.8 Additionally, the 66th MIB-T
technical support platoon facilitates military intelligence systems maintainer/integrator training; a
black/red test and communications exercise to validate equipment; and cross domain solution training for
Army systems and tailored, accredited USAREUR-AF cross domain solution systems and software.
Authorities. Simply being able to operate does not guarantee the necessary authorities, and
many rotational units discover they lack the permissions to achieve their objectives. Here, the 66th MIB-T
assists forces in navigating the bureaucracy of foreign nation partnerships or provides access to unique
66th MIB-T theater-or U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM)-derived authorities. This
includes embedding counterintelligence (CI) agents and human intelligence collectors with forward-deployed
66th MIB-T field offices to conduct force protection investigations and foreign military intelligence
collection activities (also known as FORMICA) debriefings, or using the 66th MIB-T as an INSCOM liaison to
coordinate with the U.S. Army CI Command for expanded CI authorities. Additionally, operating in the
European theater is very different from the familiarity most deploying forces have when operating in a
declared theater of active armed conflict. Arriving units must work through sovereign nations to gain
concurrence or authorization to conduct operations and training exercises, adding an unexpected layer of
complexity. The 66th MIB-T eases this transition by ensuring that deploying forces understand the
relationships they will inherit with key partners, allies, and agencies upon arrival in theater.
Key relationships. The 66th MIB-T and USAREUR-AF intelligence and security cooperation
planners maintain databases of theater-specific personalities, threats, agencies, and relationships. 66th
MIB-T planners connect deploying forces to these databases, allowing leaders to dialogue with portfolio
subject matter experts and to digest lessons learned from earlier unit deployments. These lessons learned
include topics such as the process for conducting foreign disclosure and intelligence sharing with partner
nations and NATO countries, existing plans and timelines for upcoming operational activities and exercises,
cultural sensitization and things to avoid, backgrounds on key leadership personalities and internal host
nation relationships, and even fun partnership event opportunities to build camaraderie. Deploying forces
also receive briefings on host nation support for services, supplies, and facilities.9 While most deploying units rotate into theater for 9 to 12
months, 66th MIB-T provides the continuity and maintains relationships with countries and intelligence
agencies over years and decades. Some of the most fruitful and long-term partnerships are through the
forward-stationed CI field offices that conduct bilateral operations. They play an integral role in force
protection operations by mitigating CI threats to deploying forces.10
Working with partners and allies also requires deploying units to leverage the strengths of different
partnerships. Many NATO allies have significant expertise in areas where U.S. forces may be lacking, and
host nation intelligence professionals always have a better understanding of the threat in their area than
rotational forces. While national interests may not always align perfectly, gaining consensus is vital to
ensuring all sides benefit from combined operations and analysis. The 66th MIB-T fosters enduring
cooperation by keeping intelligence operations as simple as possible: limiting the use of acronyms, using
common terms and procedures, and relying on NATO doctrine whenever possible.
For all the success over the past two years, there is still room for improvement. The 66th MIB-T, V Corps,
and the USAREUR-AF G-2 team continue to revise processes, incorporating lessons learned from the deployment
of multiple corps, divisions, expeditionary-military intelligence brigades, and enablers that have supported
the Ukrainian crisis. One notable area for necessary improvement is a deeper integration of NATO allies into
all aspects of the intelligence war-fighting function. The U.S. Army must develop a culture of intelligence
sharing and overcome the default “no foreign nationals” (more commonly known as NOFORN) dissemination
control mindset.
Fully integrating allies into operations is a formidable problem. The difficulties experienced by the 66th
MIB-T in 2024 are some of the same issues identified in 2020 by Major Chad Lorenz in his article “Setting
the Theater: Intelligence and Interoperability in DEFENDER-Europe 20,” namely: friendly collection
operations, information sharing through the mission partner environment, and provisioning of the INSCOM
Cloud Initiative (a precursor to AIDP).11
While the theater will always seek to improve the integration of allies, the USAREUR-AF Commander, having
assumed the dual role of commander of NATO’s Allied Land Command (LANDCOM), presents a renewed opportunity
to focus on interoperability. As LANDCOM serves as the multi-corps land component command, the need to
provide RSOI support to multinational corps and divisions will require greater integration with allies
across all phases of operations.12 In
this regard, 66th MIB-T may have an easier time integrating with NATO allies, as other theaters and MIB-Ts
do not have the benefit of the overarching NATO alliance to guide their missions.
Ensuring Future Success
The 66th Military Intelligence Brigade–Theater has proven indispensable in revitalizing the U.S. Army’s
intelligence RSOI capabilities in Europe. Facing the urgent demands of a new security landscape, the brigade
successfully established a robust framework across six key lines of effort—from initial planning and
theater-specific training to providing critical intelligence architecture and leveraging established
relationships. This comprehensive support ensures that deploying forces are not just present in the theater
but are immediately effective and integrated into the operational environment.
However, the mission is not without its challenges. The persistent need to deepen integration with NATO
allies and overcome institutional hurdles to information sharing remains a critical area for improvement.
The future success of collective defense in Europe hinges on transforming this challenge into a strength. As
the 66th MIB-T continues to refine its processes, its role in fostering true interoperability will be more
vital than ever, reinforcing the allied solidarity required to ensure a stable and secure Europe.
Endnotes
1. Department of the Army, Army Techniques Publication
(ATP) 3-35, Army Deployment and Redeployment (U.S. Government Publishing Office \[GPO\], 2023),
1-6.
2. “Our Support to Atlantic Resolve,” Atlantic Resolve,
U.S. Army Europe and Africa, https://www.europeafrica.army.mil/AtlanticResolve/.
3. “Our History,” Welcome to the 66th Brigade Public
Website, Major Subordinate Commands, U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command, https://www.usainscom.army.mil/MSCs/66th-MI/.
4. Department of the Army, Field Manual (FM) 3-0,
Operations (U.S. GPO, 2025), 98.
5. Department of the Army, FM 2-0, Intelligence
(U.S. GPO, 2023), 7-10.
6. Shawn Nesaw, “Cloud-Based Intel Tool AIDP Rolls Out
to Army Units Globally,” News, Capability Program Executive—Intelligence, Electronic Warfare &
Sensors, October 9, 2024, https://peoiews.army.mil/2024/10/09/277811/.
7. Department of the Army, Army Regulation 350-32,
The Army Foundry Intelligence Training Program (U.S. GPO, 2024), 1.
8. Department of the Army, FM 2-0,
Intelligence, 7-14.
9. Department of the Army, ATP 3-35, Army Deployment
and Redeployment, 5-3—5-4.
10. Department of the Army, FM 2-0,
Intelligence, 7-11.
11. Chad R. Lorenz, “Setting the Theater: Intelligence
and Interoperability in DEFENDER-Europe 20,” Military Intelligence Professional Bulletin 46,
no. 4: 83-86, https://mipb.ikn.army.mil/issues/oct-dec-2020/.
12. “Cooperative Security,” Military Partnership,
About Us, NATO Allied Land Command, https://lc.nato.int/operations/military-partnership/nato-partnership.
Authors
LTC Joe Henderson currently serves as the Director of Analysis for the Joint Interagency
Task Force—National Capital Region. He served as the brigade operations officer for the 66th Military
Intelligence Brigade—Theater from June 2022 through July 2024. He is a graduate of The Johns Hopkins
University, The University of Oklahoma, and the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College. He has
deployed multiple times with both conventional and special operations forces.