Building a Lethal Stryker Infantry Battalion in Korea
By LTC Brandon Wohlschlegel
| Infantry, Winter
2025-2026 Edition
Read Time:
< 16 mins
Leaders from the U.S. Army’s 1st Battalion, 12th Infantry Regiment and
Republic of Korea Army’s 3rd Brigade, 7th Infantry Division conduct a
combined arms rehearsal prior to Korea Combat Training Center Rotation
23-11. (Photo courtesy of author)
It has been almost 75 years since the first North Korean People’s Army
crossed the 38th parallel, beginning a war that still has not formally
ended. U.S. forces still remain on the Korean Peninsula today to deter
against future North Korea aggression, develop interoperability with the
Republic of Korea Army (ROK-A), and foster shared understanding with our
ally. The U.S. Army has permanent stationed units throughout the Korean
Peninsula; however, it also hosts units conducting nine-month rotations to
increase combat power in the Korean theater of operations (KTO). To
benefit the larger Stryker community, U.S. Army, and ROK-A partnership,
this article highlights the lessons learned during preparation and
execution of 1st Battalion, 12th Infantry Regiment’s rotation at the
Korean Combat Training Center (KCTC). Throughout the KTO, there is no
better location to build readiness and lethal units preparing for
large-scale combat operations (LSCO) than at KCTC.
The 1-12 IN “Red Warriors” from the 2nd Stryker Brigade Combat Team, 4th
Infantry Division served as the Korea Rotational Force 13 (KRF-13) for
nine months from June 2023 to February 2024. 1-12 IN is a Stryker
battalion with three Stryker companies, a headquarters and headquarters
company (HHC) with organic scout and mortars, and a forward support
company (FSC). During KRF-13, 1-12 IN augmented the ROK-A’s 3rd Brigade,
7th Infantry Division during its culminating training event at KCTC in
December 2023 (Rotation 23-11 – 7-12 December 2023). The six-day exercise
mirrored a U.S. combat training center (CTC) rotation but with a greater
combined forces aspect, which more accurately simulated LSCO on the Korean
Peninsula.
KCTC stands alone as the premier CTC that replicates the fight closest to
what American Soldiers experienced during the Korean War. The training
center is tucked into the mountainous terrain in the northeast corner of
South Korea, located near where the Battle of Heartbreak Ridge occurred in
1951. The world-class KCTC opposing force (OPFOR) not only replicates the
North Korean Army’s techniques, tactics, and equipment but also speaks the
North Korean dialect during the fight. Moreover, KCTC’s challenging
terrain and climate make it an excellent location to train Stryker
formations preparing for U.S. Indo-Pacific Command (INDOPACOM) operations.
If the terrain and extremely professional OPFOR were not enough to provide
a very difficult fight, the winter weather added another layer of
complexity and hardship for 1-12 IN. Freezing rain, mud, and snow made it
a challenge for both Strykers and dismounted infantry alike. Soldiers’
trust in their winter equipment and clothing became paramount to their
success. Units conducting operations in mountainous areas must start at
the Soldier level to build confidence and grit to operate in the harsh
environment.
Preparation
A disciplined approach to planning and preparation for any military
operation is not only prudent but expected of leaders in any military
organization. Multinational operations add to the challenge of ensuring
that planning and preparation is synched across a combined force as 1-12
IN experienced during the months leading up to the KCTC rotation. Early
integration with the ROK-A brigade, commander-to-commander dialogue, the
final coordination meeting, and understanding the differences between
Korean versus U.S. Multiple Integrated Laser Engagement System (MILES)
equipment will go a long way to ensuring the success of the overall
training.
Early Integration
As the culminating training event for the ROK-A brigade, their planning
and preparation begins far before what U.S. units typically experience
when participating in a U.S.-based CTC rotation. Future participating U.S.
units must coordinate and integrate as early as possible with the
executing ROK-A brigade. Planners must be provided from both the KRF
brigade and battalion level as early as possible in the deployment to
understand the planning timeline and parameters of the KCTC rotation. The
executing ROK-A brigade arrives to reception, staging, onward movement,
and integration (RSOI) at KCTC with the tactical plan, communications
exercise, rehearsals, and area recons already complete. With assistance
from Eighth Army and the 2nd Infantry Division, the participating KRF
battalion can better deconflict their training calendar prior to arriving
to assume the KRF mission to ensure a similar level of understanding and
that training gates are met.
ROK-US Commanders’ Dialogue
ROK-A brigade commander to U.S. battalion commander dialogue on the
tactical plan is vital. The initial ROK-A brigade tactical plan for the
rotation was drafted 60 days out and then used during the initial
in-person dialogue with the U.S. battalion commander. This dialogue is
instrumental in the ROK-A brigade’s understanding of the capabilities and
composition of a U.S. Stryker battalion and key higher-level U.S.
enablers. With this information given in a timely manner, the ROK-A
brigade can continue to refine its tactical plan, giving the Stryker
infantry battalion tasks in line with its mission and capabilities. This
requires the participating Stryker battalion to provide a capabilities
brief to the ROK-A counterparts early and often, if needed. Through
understanding each counterpart’s capabilities, the respective unit can
integrate fires and effects to enable a successful rotation.
Final Coordination Meeting
The ROK-A brigade’s final coordination meeting at KCTC (approximately two
weeks out from the beginning of the rotation) is the most crucial
pre-rotation training event for participating U.S. units to attend. This
weeklong conference goes over the entire rotation from start to finish and
serves as the final checks and balances for all participating units. It is
recommended that the KRF battalion commander with staff attend this event.
All the details from arrival, RSOI, tactical assembly areas, battle
positions, avenues of attack to objectives are discussed during this
conference. If the KRF battalion misses other train-up opportunities prior
to the final coordination meeting, this event is critical to help
synchronize their efforts prior to the rotation.
A Stryker crew from 1-12 IN conducts operations during KCTC 23-11. (U.S.
Army photo)
ROK Army MILES
The Korean MILES equivalent is easier to use and more intuitive than U.S.
MILES gear. Not only is every Soldier’s movement tracked from start to
finish, but every bullet shot from any MILES-equipped weapon is logged. If
MILES “rules the battlefield” at U.S. CTCs, then it is true to a much
higher degree at KCTC. Kills will not be adjudicated by ROK-A observer
controllers (OCs) unless the MILES records it. Korean and like U.S.
weapons have the appropriate MILES, but the following key U.S. weapon
systems do not have Korean MILES: M2 .50 Caliber Machine Gun, Javelins,
81mm mortars, and 120mm mortars. If equivalent MILES gear can be procured,
this will help more accurately replicate the combat power of a Stryker
formation and increase the supporting unit’s lethality during the
exercise. For example, during KCTC, 1-12 IN fired 1,362 rounds of 120mm
mortars, of which only six rounds were adjudicated due to a lack of MILES.
Last, with the lack of replicated Javelin and Common Remotely Operated
Weapon Station-Javelin (CROW-J) capabilities, a Stryker battalion’s
ability to destroy enemy armored vehicles becomes limited to Korean
MILES-equipped Panzerfausts. Thus, U.S. Soldiers must be properly trained
and ready to use the Panzerfausts prior to the beginning of the exercise.
For a real-world mission, the application of dismounted anti-tank weapons
(AT4s and Carl Gustafs) will be crucial to the success of the infantry
along the limited number of main and alternate supply routes accessible
due to Korea’s topography.
Overall, the approach and attention to detail from the ROK-A rotational
unit during planning and preparation should be mirrored by the supporting
KRF battalion. Every attempt at integration prior to the exercise should
be prioritized when humanly possible. The early link-up and
synchronization will pay huge dividends during the KCTC fight.
Execution
The execution of KCTC 23-11 included two battle periods: a three-day
defensive phase and a three-day offensive phase. Throughout each phase,
the OPFOR was relentless from start to finish, replicating North Korean
tactics from the individual level all the way up to battalion level. All
nine 1-12 IN maneuver platoons experienced significant combat action,
having to fight as a platoon tied into a larger company, battalion, and
brigade fight. Of all the lessons learned from a KCTC rotation, there are
four critical areas to highlight to increase shared understanding across
the force: multinational interoperability, engagement area development (EA
DEV), rear area security, and the advantages of Stryker formations in
Korea.
Soldiers in 1-12 IN receive a class on the Korean Multiple Integrated
Laser System equivalent.
Multinational Interoperability
Multinational interoperability begins with having the right liaison cells
at the right locations, up and down the chain of command. The ROK-A and
U.S. liaison officers (LNOs) directly impact mission command through the
human aspect of interoperability during the rotation, bridging procedural
and technological interoperability gaps. LNO cells played a major role in
the effectiveness of all three dimensions of interoperability.
Both the ROK-A brigade and KRF battalion must agree upon a deliberate plan
for LNO support. Bridging the language, tactical, and cultural barriers
between U.S. and ROK-A forces is critical not only to promoting combined
interoperability but also to winning the fight. During 1-12 IN’s KCTC
rotation, the ROK-A brigade provided a two-man LNO package with
communication systems to the 1-12 IN battalion main command post (MCP),
and in turn, 1-12 IN provided a LNO package to the ROK-A brigade MCP with
two digital platforms (Joint Battle Command-Platform [JBC-P]) and two
frequency modulation (FM) communications nets. This communications
redundancy ensured that even if one system became non-mission capable or
impaired by enemy actions, there was still information exchange between
the headquarters.
The one major improvement gleaned from the KCTC rotation was the
requirement to have LNO packages with adjacent multinational battalions,
not just higher headquarters, to be able to have shared understanding and
synchronization of the battlefield. Future U.S. rotations to the KCTC or
other multinational CTCs should provide at least one U.S. LNO with
communication equipment to each adjacent ROK-A unit. 1-12 IN’s situational
awareness was severely limited during offensive operations due to the
inability to directly talk with adjacent ROK-A units. These additional LNO
packages with a higher-level synchronization matrix would have
significantly increased cross-talk and near simultaneity of U.S. and ROK
forces’ efforts.
Engagement Area Development
EA DEV over large company sectors in severely restricted terrain provided
a unique challenge to 1-12 IN. Most of the terrain in northern Korea is
challenging for Stryker battalions due to the mountainous terrain. The
enemy understands this limitation and employs dismounts to penetrate
combined forces’ defenses off major and alternate supply routes. As a
result, platoons must establish mutually supporting dismounted battle
positions (BPs), utilizing the terrain to their advantage. Key to this
defense is to employ all forms of BPs: primary, alternate, supplementary,
and subsequent. This will allow a company to defend terrain that is very
susceptible to enemy infiltration. Proper security and early warning
tactics and techniques must be used to identify which avenue of approach
the enemy is using to get accurate indirect fires on enemy movements and
to reposition friendly forces to other BPs when necessary. In the
mountainous terrain, linear defenses and non-linear defenses will quickly
be overcome by superior enemy numbers. Primary BPs must be mutually
supporting with very clear engagement, disengagement, and movement
criteria to alternate, supplementary, and subsequent BPs.
For brigade and battalion-level EA DEV planning, obstacle belt intent must
be tied to reality. On the Korean battlefield, unless you have a superior
number of forces or the requisite Class IV and V (material for obstacles),
blocking or turning enemy forces into engagement areas will be nearly
impossible. 1-12 IN quickly learned this during the first 24 hours of the
defense. Although the battalion was arrayed in BPs, it was not going to be
able to turn the enemy dismounted forces into its main engagement area. In
reality, obstacle intent should be to either fix or disrupt the enemy
movements utilizing indirect fires as the primary means and eventually
jumping infantry platoons to supplementary or subsequent BPs as the unit
continues to attrite the enemy’s superior numbers. Obstacle emplacement
along main or alternate supply routes do reduce the enemy’s ability to
sustain the fight, but the dismounted forces are able to continue the
pressure on the defensive fight.
Rear Area Security during Offensive Operations
Deliberate actions for rear area security missions in Korea are vital to
maintaining and building combat power. As 1-12 IN transitioned to the
offensive phase of the operation, they were given the mission for brigade
rear area security prior to stepping off on the attack during later phases
in the operation. The number one lesson learned is that the enemy will
have eyes everywhere. The terrain provides a drastic advantage to enemy
special purpose forces and observation posts when fighting a wheeled or
tracked U.S.-ROK force. The nature of a Stryker fleet operating in severe
mountainous terrain is being road-bound, where command posts (CP) and
tactical assembly areas (TAA) can only stray from the main routes to an
extent before the terrain becomes more hazardous for vehicles than the
enemy. Dismounts in mountainous terrain remain crucial, which implores
units to train both mounted and dismounted.
Through 1-12 IN’s experience, Stryker companies must focus on the
following priorities of work during rear area security operations: posting
local security, positioning key weapons systems, assigning sectors of
fire, and establishing the company counter-reconnaissance and surveillance
operations. Counter-reconnaissance is the sum of all actions taken at each
echelon to counter enemy reconnaissance and surveillance efforts
throughout the area of operation. The purpose of counter-reconnaissance is
to destroy, defeat, or repel all enemy reconnaissance elements within
capabilities and following engagement criteria. It is not a distinct
mission but a component of all forms of security operations, denying the
enemy commander the ability to conduct reconnaissance and develop
situational understanding. Successfully countering enemy reconnaissance is
the first and possibly most important step in an operation. During the
KCTC rotation, 1-12 IN learned that active reconnaissance and surveillance
(R&S) patrols were the main deterrent to keep enemy observers from
finding CP and TAA locations in a severely restricted terrain environment.
Secondly, for the company and platoon elements not directly participating
in rear area security operations, you must always have a plan to jump
locations when the enemy is able to identify your location. This
identification of friendly CPs and TAAs was always followed by enemy
indirect fires during the KCTC fight. It is critical, especially in Korea,
to have a deliberate rear area security plan, counter R&S operations,
and relocation plan. Without a plan and deliberate actions, the lack of
preservation of combat power for offensive operations will quickly
overwhelm a combat unit in the rear area.
Soldiers from 1-21 IN and ROK-A conduct a rehearsal of concept drill.
Advantages of Stryker Formation in Korea
Although many lessons learned can be applied to any formation, whether
they are light, wheeled, or mechanized, the three biggest advantages
derived from fighting with a Stryker infantry battalion at KCTC are:
increased tactical mobility, enhanced communications, and ability for
greater sustainment operations.
Tactical Mobility: As in many locations in Korea and
across INDOPACOM, severely restricted foothills to mountainous terrain
provide unique challenges and opportunities to train the capability of a
Stryker formation. The control of limited ground lines of communication
(LOCs) due to the natural canalization of the severally restricted terrain
will be a key task during combat operations. Without open LOCs,
forward-positioned forces will quickly become cut off from the larger body
of friendly ground forces as has been readily documented during many
battles in the Korean War. A U.S. Stryker infantry battalion’s advantage
in this type of warfare is the ability to quickly self-transport infantry
to a dismount point, just outside of enemy contact range, and then have
the infantry clear forward, destroying enemy positions along the LOCs.
This technique of dismounting and clearing forward of the mounted element
in severely restricted terrain has the advantage of not exposing Strykers
to enemy anti-tank weapons or indirect fire before the infantry can clear
the enemy positions. Once the dismounts have destroyed enemy observation
posts and anti-tank elements are destroyed, only then should Strykers be
called forward to help sustain the fight. Clearing the possible threats
allows the true advantage of Stryker formations to be used to rapidly
seize terrain and maintain momentum. Training at the KCTC allows a
combined force to practice these exact tactics, which cannot be replicated
at other CTCs to the same effect.
Enhanced Communication: The Stryker’s enhanced
communication systems are a game-changer in mountainous terrain. It is
relatively easy to outrun line-of-sight communications in Korea, but the
JBC-P alone will help a geographically dispersed Stryker formation
maintain situational awareness and execute command and control. The
real-time sharing of graphics, intelligence, and situation reports across
the complex KCTC terrain was instrumental to the commander’s understanding
of the battlefield. The fight for communication is continuous on the
Korean battlefield. The proper utilization and positioning of JBC-P
systems at the battalion and company levels provided the only means of
communication when companies were out of FM comms range with battalion.
For example, the battalion scouts were able to forward position and
conceal one reconnaissance Stryker variant with JBC-P comms while
maintaining FM comms with their scout teams on the ridgelines. This
allowed the scouts to call in indirect fire on enemy positions within
seconds of the reports coming in from the scout observers on the ground.
Through a combined approach of JBC-P and FM comms, units can mitigate the
terrain’s denial of dismounted comms architecture alone.
Soldiers in Comanche Company, 1-12 IN conduct a stream crossing during
KCTC 23-11. (Photo courtesy of author)
Greater Sustainment: Finally, the ability of a Stryker
battalion to self-sustain for up to 96 hours once entering the fight
allows for extended combat operations and a greater ability to react to
contingencies as they arise. When resupply was called forward through
brigade support battalion and supply chain assets, the priority for
classes of supply was Class III(B) (fuel) followed by a combination of
Class I (food and water) and Class V (ammunition) as requested by
companies through accurate logistic reports. Companies then utilized the
service station resupply method by pulling only a limited number of
Strykers out of position or TAAs as needed to conduct resupply operations.
The bottom line is that the utilization of Strykers to self-sustain
dismounted combat operations will be key to sustaining the tempo of the
fight in Korea.
Conclusion
In conclusion, training at the KCTC allows Stryker units to exercise all
their mission-essential tasks while improving interoperability with the
ROK-A, thus increasing warfighting capabilities in the KTO. Between the
severely restricted terrain, the harsh winter weather, world-class OPFOR,
and highly professional ROK-A OCs, valuable lessons can be learned daily
at echelon. KRF units should strive to be selected to complete a KCTC
rotation, as it significantly increases their formations lethality and
interoperability. Moreover, U.S. Army Forces Command deployment readiness
exercises should send a unit straight to KCTC after RSOI as they assume
KRF or from CONUS locations to KCTC. These lessons will help future KRF
units be fully prepared to “fight tonight and win” in similar real-world
combat conditions not only in Korea but across the INDOPACOM area of
responsibility.