Responsible Speed
Maintaining standards at the speed of relevance
By Lt. Col. James Lawson, Maj. Lacey Losole and James Smith
| Army AL&T
Magazine, Spring 2025 Edition
Read Time:
< 10 mins
READY TO LAUNCH: The Uncrewed Aircraft Systems Project Management
Office, in collaboration with the U.S. Special Operations Command,
executed a successful flight demonstration involving the first launch of
the Air-Launched, Tube-Integrated Unmanned System (Altius) 700 air
vehicle on Dec. 3, 2023, at Fort Campbell, Kentucky. (Photo by Daniel
Henke, U.S. Army)
Building or buying something quickly is easy; however, building or buying
something quickly that will reliably and effectively perform for
warfighters in life-or-death situations is a challenge worthy of the best
and brightest minds in the DOD. In July 2024, the Army designated the
Long-Range Precision Munition (LRPM) for development under a Middle Tier
of Acquisition (MTA) pathway to rapidly prototype and evaluate a critical
capability. LRPM is one of many Army efforts to swiftly address emerging
threats and capability gaps, leveraging streamlined MTA authorities to
accelerate time-lines. However, to ensure LRPM is developed with
responsible speed, the Army is taking a deliberate approach to tailor in
the work necessary to balance rapid development with safety, suitability,
effectivity and long-term supportability.
Why MTA?
In the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law
114-92, 425 Section 804), Congress granted DOD transformative new
authorities for the “Rapid Prototyping and Rapid Fielding” of warfighting
equipment under a new MTA framework. These authorities provide a radically
streamlined alternative from the traditional Major Capability Acquisition
(MCA) framework, with the spirit and intent of enabling accelerated
development and delivery of critical capability to the warfighter.
The Army is continuously refining its MTA guiding policies, based on
gained experience, to better align with its goal of fostering an
innovative and streamlined acquisition framework. These policies encourage
closer and quicker collaboration across the enterprise of stakeholder
communities, minimizing bureaucratic barriers through two variants:
-
MTA for “Rapid Prototyping” is designed to quickly prototype and
evaluate emergent technologies for warfighting needs.
-
MTA for “Rapid Fielding” is designed to quickly deliver transformative
but mature technologies to Soldiers in the field.
MTA authorities significantly reduce the reporting requirements inherent
in traditional MCA frameworks, empowering materiel developers to focus on
responsive development, user feedback and technological refinement. By
reducing documentation and over-sight burdens, the MTA allows program
officers to operate with greater agility and responsiveness. However, this
reduction in mandated reporting does not absolve materiel developers of
the need to deliver capabilities with responsible speed and responsible
risk—thinking through enduring needs as well.
Enter Responsible Speed
Responsible speed necessitates a balanced approach to acquisition,
combining the agility of streamlined processes with deliberate and
thorough decision-making. While MTA reduces the documentation and
milestone requirements of MCA, materiel developers must still ensure
deliberate cross-functional and expert reviews. These reviews address the
core attributes of a capability including safety, suitability, effectivity
and supportability to facilitate potential transition into a long-term
acquisition framework. Responsible speed emphasizes that rapid development
must not come at the expense of strategic foresight or comprehensive
capability evaluations. Materiel developers, as vanguards of Soldier
overmatch, must focus on accountability, agile development and creating a
foundation for transition.
In three categories, responsible speed may be loosely characterized as:
-
Accountability- Balancing the need for speed with the
obligation to deliver safe, suitable, effective and supportable systems
that meet operational demands. Meaning, program managers are responsible
for assessing and accepting prudent risk to prototype and field a safe,
suitable, effective and supportable capability in the most expeditious
manner.
-
Agile Development- Rapidly incorporating feedback from
users and requirements from stakeholders to refine solutions. MTA
programs must be structured and aligned to the thinking and execution
approaches required to build to an initial set of requirements and then
be receptive to feedback aimed to aid in development.
-
Foundation for Transition- Posturing MTA programs to
smoothly transition into enduring Programs of Record. Essentially,
program managers and MTA stakeholders must be committed to not only
moving fast but also thinking through the life cycle requirements,
sustainment strategies and operational compatibility.
The fundamental challenge of an MTA is to execute with responsible speed
and responsible risk, which means balancing delivering transformative
capability, at the speed of relevance, while maintaining standards—despite
the ability to tailor documentation. Enter one of the Army’s newest MTAs
for Rapid Prototyping (MTA-RP), the LRPM.
MTA PAVING THE WAY: The MTA pathway enables quick prototyping and
delivers transformative technologies to Soldiers in the field. (Graphic
by USAASC)
The LRPM Variant
The LRPM is the lethal, medium-range variant of the Army’s Launched
Effects (LE) family of systems—a material solution to support multidomain
operations at all echelons in a peer-threat environment. The LE uncrewed
aircraft family of systems will deliver doctrinally transformative
capability to the Soldier through a family of long-, medium- and
short-range unmanned systems designed to be deployed from the ground and
air.
The LRPM MTA-RP commenced with responsible speed in July 2024, following a
series of acquisition shaping panels and a program initiation brief to the
Hon. Douglas R. Bush, then assistant secretary of the Army for
acquisition, logistics and technology (ASA(ALT)) and the Army Acquisition
Executive (AAE). Bush designated LRPM as an MTA-RP program and charged the
Program Executive Office for Missiles and Space (PEO MS) with decision
authority and developing, procuring and testing this new lethal munition
concept.
The MTA pathway provides a unique opportunity to fast-track LRPM
prototyping and integrating emerging technologies. The MTA-RP framework
minimizes bureaucratic hurdles, enables agile decision-making and supports
operational employment quickly. By rapidly prototyping and demonstrating
the capability in an operational environment, the Army can make an
informed decision on the suitability of the materiel solution. A
prescribed five-year MTA authority ensures accelerated timelines to assess
solutions to immediate capability gaps, while simultaneously providing
insights for further refinement on subsequent variants and iterations.
Executing Responsible Speed
In December 2024, the LRPM MTA-RP Decision Authority, Maj. Gen. Frank J.
Lozano, PEO MS, established the baseline LRPM hardware configuration
comprised of an Anduril Altius A700M air-vehicle and multiple science and
technology (S&T) initiatives from the Army Combat Capabilities
Development Command’s (DEVCOM) Aviation and Missile Center (AvMC). The
DEVCOM AvMC S&T initiatives included in the LRPM are the Multiple
Simultaneous Engagement Technologies and Precision Target Acquisition
Seeker software capabilities, a seeker and guidance section collectively
developed by Hood Technology Corporation and DEVCOM AvMC and a DEVCOM
AvMC-developed combined effects warhead. This configuration of the LRPM
will undergo safety and suitability testing and be employed in follow-on
ground and air-based operational demonstrations to inform production and
deployment decisions.
In keeping with the themes of “responsible speed” and accountability,
agile development and foundations for transition, there are various
examples of functional application in the LRPM MTA-R.
Adapting to Responsive Requirements
An Abbreviated Capability Development Document (A-CDD) is a streamlined
version of the traditional Capabilities Development Document that outlines
essential performance requirements, operational needs and intended use of
a system or capability in a concise manner. This abbreviated structure
allows flexibility among the requirements, user and materiel developer
communities to achieve a desired capability quickly, while informing the
requirements community of what is possible. The A-CDD supporting the LRPM
program is in evolution as lessons learned from ongoing conflicts improve
understanding of what is necessary to develop a combat-effective system on
a modern battlefield.
There is a natural conflict between an evolving A-CDD responding to
battlefield realities and the stringent requirements necessary to place
explosive munitions in the hands of Soldiers. Qualifying and testing a
munition requires extensive and often sequential tests to ensure safety
and reliability. In addition to ensuring safety validation requirements,
LRPM is responsible for integrating emerging technologies to address the
demands of the evolving battlespace. However, adoption of these
technologies introduces risks to cost, schedule and performance. A
critical aspect of this process is determining when to execute a branch
plan to mitigate risk associated with long-lead requirements and ensure
timely delivery of the LRPM to operational units.
“Good Idea Cut-Off” Points
The LRPM program must have a plan to integrate (or defer to a future LRPM
version) the capabilities being developed for the LE enterprise (e.g., a
multi-use air and ground launcher solution and a universal command and
control system). Lozano directed the program to identify “good idea
cut-of” (GICO) points. Essentially, to meet the constraints of the MTA
timeline, the LRPM program must have off-ramps and alternatives if any of
the LE-enabling capabilities are not mature enough to support the LRPM
timeline. The LRPM program backward planned from mandated operational
demonstration dates to identify the “no later than” points, which the LRPM
must have access to properly incorporate and test.
The resultant product is a programmatic plan that incorporates GICO
decision points with alternate paths to successfully execute. The program
maintains active stakeholder engagement to understand the planned
inclusion of emerging technologies and LRPM’s plan to incorporate the
technologies in a future version. Active, transparent communication with
stake-holders on current program status falls in the box of “must do” to
achieve and main-tain responsible speed.
RAPID PROTOTYPING IN ACTION: The U.S. Army's Future Tactical Uncrewed
Aircraft Systems (FTUAS) Product Office has officially taken receipt of
the Textron Systems' MK 4.8 HQ Aerosonde system, in December 2024,
marking a significant milestone in the program's Rapid Prototyping
effort. (Photo by David Hylton, Program Executive Office for Aviation)
Testing Inclusivity
Developing a lethal munition inherently requires extensive safety and
suitability testing requirements. Te Department of Defense Instruction
(DODI) 5000.80 (Operation of the Middle Tier of Acquisition), DODI 5000.89
(Test and Evaluation) and ASA(ALT) MTA Policy collectively indicate that
an MTA-RP is bound, by regulatory and statutory responsibility, to develop
a Test and Evaluation Strategy (TES, regulatory) and demonstrate and
evaluate operational performance (statutory). The LRPM program has been
deliberately inclusive with stakeholders during the development of the
LRPM TES. Given the depth and breadth of munitions testing requirements
and complexity of the program, there is no way to execute “responsible
speed” without deliberate inclusivity. Borrowing the words of the
Honorable Heidi Shyu (curated from her tenure as a former ASA(ALT) and
AAE), “Everyone is on the acquisition accountability bus,” and there is no
way to successfully arrive at the desired destination without coordinated
participation.
Conclusion
The introduction of the MTA authorities significantly reduced the required
documentation and reporting compared to traditional MCA. However, both
acquisition paths can produce programs of record with established and
statutory and regulatory information requirements. Te DOD and the Army
continue to evolve the guiding MTA regulations and policies based on
lessons learned from early MTA programs that have completed transition.
The LRPM program is leveraging the MTA authorities and executing with
“responsible speed,” while also posturing to transition to a program of
record if the Army deems the LRPM worthy of enduring operational use. The
PEO MS, LE community, DOD and Army-enterprise stakeholder communities are
dedicated to delivering transformative capability, at the speed of
relevance, while meeting standards in system safety, suitability,
effectivity and supportability.
For more information on LR PM, go to
https://www.army.mil/peoms or
contact the PEO MS Public Affairs at
usarmy.redstone.peo-ms.list.msls-hq-public-affairs@army.mil.
Authors
LT. COL. James Lawson is the product manager for the
Aviation Rockets and Small Guided Munitions Product Office in the
Tactical Aviation and Ground Munitions Project Office and PEO MS at
Redstone Arsenal, Alabama. He holds an MBA with an operations and supply
chain management focus from the College of William and Mary and a B.S.
in geospatial information science from the United States Military
Academy. He is DAWIA Certified Advanced in project management.
MAJ. Lacey Losole is an assistant product manager in
the Aviation Rockets and Small Guided Munitions Product Office,
supporting LRPM. She holds an MPA in public administration from the
University of Hawaii, Manoa, and a B.S. in aviation management from
Florida Institute of Technology.
James Smith is a participant in the U.S. Army
Acquisition Support Center Leadership Excellence in Acquisition
Development (LEAD) program, Year Group 24, serving in a developmental
detail to the Aviation Rockets and Small Guided Munitions Product
Office, supporting LRPM. He has an M.S. in business administration from
Central Michigan University and a B.A. in business administration from
the University of Florida. He is a DAWIA Certified Practitioner in
project management.