Responsible Speed
Maintaining standards at the speed of relevance
By Lt. Col. James Lawson, Maj. Lacey Losole and James Smith
Article published on: July 21, 2025, in the Spring 2025 Issue of Army AL-T
Read Time: < 7 mins
READY TO LAUNCH: The Uncrewed Aircraft Systems Project Management Office, in collaboration
with the U.S. Special Operations Command, executed a successful flight demonstration involving the first
launch of the Air-Launched, Tube-Integrated Unmanned System (Altius) 700 air vehicle on Dec. 3, 2023, at
Fort Campbell, Kentucky. (Photo by Daniel Henke, U.S. Army)
Building or buying something quickly is easy; however, building or buying something quickly that will
reliably and effectively perform for warfighters in life-or-death situations is a challenge worthy of the best
and brightest minds in the DOD. In July 2024, the Army designated the Long-Range Precision Munition (LRPM)
for development under a Middle Tier of Acquisition (MTA) pathway to rapidly prototype and evaluate a
critical capability. LRPM is one of many Army efforts to swiftly address emerging threats and capability
gaps, leveraging streamlined MTA authorities to accelerate time-lines. However, to ensure LRPM is developed
with responsible speed, the Army is taking a deliberate approach to tailor in the work necessary to balance
rapid development with safety, suitability, effectivity and long-term supportability.
Why MTA?
In the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114-92, 425 Section 804),
Congress granted DOD transformative new authorities for the “Rapid Prototyping and Rapid Fielding” of
warfighting equipment under a new MTA framework. These authorities provide a radically streamlined
alternative from the traditional Major Capability Acquisition (MCA) framework, with the spirit and intent of
enabling accelerated development and delivery of critical capability to the warfighter.
The Army is continuously refining its MTA guiding policies, based on gained experience, to better align with
its goal of fostering an innovative and streamlined acquisition framework. These policies encourage closer
and quicker collaboration across the enterprise of stakeholder communities, minimizing bureaucratic barriers
through two variants:
- MTA for “Rapid Prototyping” is designed to quickly prototype and evaluate emergent technologies for
warfighting needs.
- MTA for “Rapid Fielding” is designed to quickly deliver transformative but mature technologies to
Soldiers in the field.
MTA authorities significantly reduce the reporting requirements inherent in traditional MCA frameworks,
empowering materiel developers to focus on responsive development, user feedback and technological
refinement. By reducing documentation and over-sight burdens, the MTA allows program officers to operate
with greater agility and responsiveness. However, this reduction in mandated reporting does not absolve
materiel developers of the need to deliver capabilities with responsible speed and responsible risk—thinking
through enduring needs as well.
Enter Responsible Speed
Responsible speed necessitates a balanced approach to acquisition, combining the agility of streamlined
processes with deliberate and thorough decision-making. While MTA reduces the documentation and milestone
requirements of MCA, materiel developers must still ensure deliberate cross-functional and expert reviews.
These reviews address the core attributes of a capability including safety, suitability, effectivity and
supportability to facilitate potential transition into a long-term acquisition framework. Responsible speed
emphasizes that rapid development must not come at the expense of strategic foresight or comprehensive
capability evaluations. Materiel developers, as vanguards of Soldier overmatch, must focus on
accountability, agile development and creating a foundation for transition.
In three categories, responsible speed may be loosely characterized as:
- Accountability- Balancing the need for speed with the obligation to deliver safe,
suitable, effective and supportable systems that meet operational demands. Meaning, program managers are
responsible for assessing and accepting prudent risk to prototype and field a safe, suitable, effective
and supportable capability in the most expeditious manner.
- Agile Development- Rapidly incorporating feedback from users and requirements from
stakeholders to refine solutions. MTA programs must be structured and aligned to the thinking and
execution approaches required to build to an initial set of requirements and then be receptive to
feedback aimed to aid in development.
- Foundation for Transition- Posturing MTA programs to smoothly transition into enduring
Programs of Record. Essentially, program managers and MTA stakeholders must be committed to not only
moving fast but also thinking through the life cycle requirements, sustainment strategies and
operational compatibility.
The fundamental challenge of an MTA is to execute with responsible speed and responsible risk, which means
balancing delivering transformative capability, at the speed of relevance, while maintaining
standards—despite the ability to tailor documentation. Enter one of the Army’s newest MTAs for Rapid
Prototyping (MTA-RP), the LRPM.
MTA PAVING THE WAY: The MTA pathway enables quick prototyping and delivers transformative
technologies to Soldiers in the field. (Graphic by USAASC)
The LRPM Variant
The LRPM is the lethal, medium-range variant of the Army’s Launched Effects (LE) family of systems—a material
solution to support multidomain operations at all echelons in a peer-threat environment. The LE uncrewed
aircraft family of systems will deliver doctrinally transformative capability to the Soldier through a
family of long-, medium- and short-range unmanned systems designed to be deployed from the ground and air.
The LRPM MTA-RP commenced with responsible speed in July 2024, following a series of acquisition shaping
panels and a program initiation brief to the Hon. Douglas R. Bush, then assistant secretary of the Army for
acquisition, logistics and technology (ASA(ALT)) and the Army Acquisition Executive (AAE). Bush designated
LRPM as an MTA-RP program and charged the Program Executive Office for Missiles and Space (PEO MS) with
decision authority and developing, procuring and testing this new lethal munition concept.
The MTA pathway provides a unique opportunity to fast-track LRPM prototyping and integrating emerging
technologies. The MTA-RP framework minimizes bureaucratic hurdles, enables agile decision-making and
supports operational employment quickly. By rapidly prototyping and demonstrating the capability in an
operational environment, the Army can make an informed decision on the suitability of the materiel solution.
A prescribed five-year MTA authority ensures accelerated timelines to assess solutions to immediate
capability gaps, while simultaneously providing insights for further refinement on subsequent variants and
iterations.
Executing Responsible Speed
In December 2024, the LRPM MTA-RP Decision Authority, Maj. Gen. Frank J. Lozano, PEO MS, established the
baseline LRPM hardware configuration comprised of an Anduril Altius A700M air-vehicle and multiple science
and technology (S&T) initiatives from the Army Combat Capabilities Development Command’s (DEVCOM) Aviation
and Missile Center (AvMC). The DEVCOM AvMC S&T initiatives included in the LRPM are the Multiple
Simultaneous Engagement Technologies and Precision Target Acquisition Seeker software capabilities, a seeker
and guidance section collectively developed by Hood Technology Corporation and DEVCOM AvMC and a DEVCOM
AvMC-developed combined effects warhead. This configuration of the LRPM will undergo safety and suitability
testing and be employed in follow-on ground and air-based operational demonstrations to inform production
and deployment decisions.
In keeping with the themes of “responsible speed” and accountability, agile development and foundations for
transition, there are various examples of functional application in the LRPM MTA-R.
Adapting to Responsive Requirements
An Abbreviated Capability Development Document (A-CDD) is a streamlined version of the traditional
Capabilities Development Document that outlines essential performance requirements, operational needs and
intended use of a system or capability in a concise manner. This abbreviated structure allows flexibility
among the requirements, user and materiel developer communities to achieve a desired capability quickly,
while informing the requirements community of what is possible. The A-CDD supporting the LRPM program is in
evolution as lessons learned from ongoing conflicts improve understanding of what is necessary to develop a
combat-effective system on a modern battlefield.
There is a natural conflict between an evolving A-CDD responding to battlefield realities and the stringent
requirements necessary to place explosive munitions in the hands of Soldiers. Qualifying and testing a
munition requires extensive and often sequential tests to ensure safety and reliability. In addition to
ensuring safety validation requirements, LRPM is responsible for integrating emerging technologies to
address the demands of the evolving battlespace. However, adoption of these technologies introduces risks to
cost, schedule and performance. A critical aspect of this process is determining when to execute a branch
plan to mitigate risk associated with long-lead requirements and ensure timely delivery of the LRPM to
operational units.
“Good Idea Cut-Off” Points
The LRPM program must have a plan to integrate (or defer to a future LRPM version) the capabilities being
developed for the LE enterprise (e.g., a multi-use air and ground launcher solution and a universal command
and control system). Lozano directed the program to identify “good idea cut-of” (GICO) points. Essentially,
to meet the constraints of the MTA timeline, the LRPM program must have off-ramps and alternatives if any of
the LE-enabling capabilities are not mature enough to support the LRPM timeline. The LRPM program backward
planned from mandated operational demonstration dates to identify the “no later than” points, which the LRPM
must have access to properly incorporate and test.
The resultant product is a programmatic plan that incorporates GICO decision points with alternate paths to
successfully execute. The program maintains active stakeholder engagement to understand the planned
inclusion of emerging technologies and LRPM’s plan to incorporate the technologies in a future version.
Active, transparent communication with stake-holders on current program status falls in the box of “must do”
to achieve and main-tain responsible speed.
RAPID PROTOTYPING IN ACTION: The U.S. Army's Future Tactical Uncrewed Aircraft Systems
(FTUAS) Product Office has officially taken receipt of the Textron Systems' MK 4.8 HQ Aerosonde system, in
December 2024, marking a significant milestone in the program's Rapid Prototyping effort. (Photo by David
Hylton, Program Executive Office for Aviation)
Testing Inclusivity
Developing a lethal munition inherently requires extensive safety and suitability testing requirements. Te
Department of Defense Instruction (DODI) 5000.80 (Operation of the Middle Tier of Acquisition), DODI 5000.89
(Test and Evaluation) and ASA(ALT) MTA Policy collectively indicate that an MTA-RP is bound, by regulatory
and statutory responsibility, to develop a Test and Evaluation Strategy (TES, regulatory) and demonstrate
and evaluate operational performance (statutory). The LRPM program has been deliberately inclusive with
stakeholders during the development of the LRPM TES. Given the depth and breadth of munitions testing
requirements and complexity of the program, there is no way to execute “responsible speed” without
deliberate inclusivity. Borrowing the words of the Honorable Heidi Shyu (curated from her tenure as a former
ASA(ALT) and AAE), “Everyone is on the acquisition accountability bus,” and there is no way to successfully
arrive at the desired destination without coordinated participation.
Conclusion
The introduction of the MTA authorities significantly reduced the required documentation and reporting
compared to traditional MCA. However, both acquisition paths can produce programs of record with established
and statutory and regulatory information requirements. Te DOD and the Army continue to evolve the guiding
MTA regulations and policies based on lessons learned from early MTA programs that have completed
transition. The LRPM program is leveraging the MTA authorities and executing with “responsible speed,” while
also posturing to transition to a program of record if the Army deems the LRPM worthy of enduring
operational use. The PEO MS, LE community, DOD and Army-enterprise stakeholder communities are dedicated to
delivering transformative capability, at the speed of relevance, while meeting standards in system safety,
suitability, effectivity and supportability.
For more information on LR PM, go to https://www.army.mil/peoms or
contact the PEO MS Public Affairs at usarmy.redstone.peo-ms.list.msls-hq-public-affairs@army.mil.
Authors
LT. COL. James Lawson is the product manager for the Aviation Rockets and Small Guided
Munitions Product Office in the Tactical Aviation and Ground Munitions Project Office and PEO MS at
Redstone Arsenal, Alabama. He holds an MBA with an operations and supply chain management focus from the
College of William and Mary and a B.S. in geospatial information science from the United States Military
Academy. He is DAWIA Certified Advanced in project management.
MAJ. Lacey Losole is an assistant product manager in the Aviation Rockets and Small
Guided Munitions Product Office, supporting LRPM. She holds an MPA in public administration from the
University of Hawaii, Manoa, and a B.S. in aviation management from Florida Institute of Technology.
James Smith is a participant in the U.S. Army Acquisition Support Center Leadership
Excellence in Acquisition Development (LEAD) program, Year Group 24, serving in a developmental detail
to the Aviation Rockets and Small Guided Munitions Product Office, supporting LRPM. He has an M.S. in
business administration from Central Michigan University and a B.A. in business administration from the
University of Florida. He is a DAWIA Certified Practitioner in project management.