Drop, Improvise, Win OSS
In China
By Lt. Col. Zachary Griffths
Article published on: June 24th, 2025 in the Special Warfare 2025 E-edition
Read Time:< 12 mins
At 4:30 a.m. on Aug. 16, 1945, six men flew into the unknown. By sundown, they’d been beaten, stripped, and
installed in the nicest hotel in Mukden. None of them knew this was in front of them just seven days earlier.
The end of World War II surprised the Office of Strategic Services (OSS). On Aug. 11, 1945, two days after the
nuclear attack on Nagasaki, the OSS received the mission to dispatch Mercy Mission teams into China.01 The Japanese had badly treated
American prisoners of war, and there were concerns that Japanese officers might execute prisoners rather than
return them to American control. As an additional concern, the Soviet Union had invaded Manchuria in northern
China on August 9 and were racing towards camps holding American prisoners.
The OSS had a clear task: Get there first
Though the war’s end surprised the OSS, they were ready. Commander of OSS forces in China, Col. Richard Heppner,
reported August 10 that “although we have been caught with our pants down, we will do our best to pull them up
in time.”02 The OSS transitioned
quickly. The same day, Heppner sent another cable reporting that his commandos were “ready to leave
tomorrow.”03
Cardinal dropped in alongside seven other Mercy Mission teams across China on August 16 — just seven days after
Fat Man fell on Nagasaki. Their mission was to prevent further harm to allied prisoners by the Japanese or the
rapidly approaching Soviets.04 These
teams also had secondary intelligence gathering objectives in otherwise inaccessible locations.05 The Mercy Missions were a
veritable “who’s who” of future special operations leaders. Colonel Aaron Bank led the Raven mission into Laos
while Capt. John Singlaub joined the Magpie mission into Beijing.06 All of the Mercy Missions put OSS operatives in challenging situations
where they found both success and failure.
Small teams operating in politically sensitive, semi-permissive environments are core to what Army special
operations does, particularly in the Indo-Pacific, yet operations like Cardinal remain underexplored. A review
of eight Special Warfare and Veritas articles found only two mentions of OSS operations in China, and only one
included the Mercy Missions.07
Cardinal is worth closer study not because it was cleanly executed, but because it succeeded amid limited
intelligence, minimal guidance, and political ambiguity—the same environments our teams must prepare for today.
CARDINAL, THE STORY
The six men of Operation Cardinal had no time to rehearse and no idea what they would find. Dropping into
Japanese-occupied Manchuria just a day after the emperor’s surrender, they carried a mandate to get there
first—before the Soviets, before the chaos, and before anyone else could harm or hide the prisoners.
Little is recorded about the planning for Cardinal. However, the team’s diverse membership and varied airdropped
supplies show an understanding of the challenges ahead. Cardinal initially had six members. Major James T.
Hennessy led the operation. Major Robert F. Lamar, a physician, joined to provide immediate medical care for the
prisoners. On the enlisted side, Staff Sgt. Hal Leith served as the Russian language interpreter, Sgt. Edward A.
Starz served as the radio operator, and Sgt. Fumio Kido served as the Japanese interpreter. As a
second-generation American born to Japanese parents in Hawaii, he spoke fluent Japanese. The team also included
Maj. Cheng Shih-wu, a Nationalist Chinese officer and the team’s Chinese interpreter.08
The team departed from Hsian at 4:30 a.m. on August 16, flying 800 miles to Mukden aboard a B-24 Liberator. The
aircraft, designed for bombing runs, was not ideal for parachute insertion. Still, the team exited one by one
through the bomb bay, landing in broad daylight outside the industrial city of Mukden.09
Hundreds of local Chinese surrounded the drop zone as Cardinal landed. As Starz and Cheng gathered the equipment,
the rest of the party started walking to the Hoten camp, located north of the drop zone. Two Japanese platoons
ambushed the Americans walking north. Unaware the war had ended, the Japanese forced the team to disarm and
disrobe. They then beat the prisoners. Kido faced special violence as a Japanese-American. Fortunately, a
Japanese officer arrived on horseback soon after, ending the violence. He then took them to meet with the
Kempati, Japanese secret police, in downtown Mukden. The Kempati agreed to escort them to the Hoten Camp the
next day, installing them in the nicest hotel in Mukden in the meantime.
The next day, on August 17, Cardinal liberated the Hoten camp. With a Japanese escort, Cardinal traveled to the
camp, met with the senior American, and then announced the camp’s liberation. They rescued 1,321 Americans, 239
British, and some Australian, Dutch, and Canadian prisoners.10 Cardinal also learned of an additional camp, holding senior allied
prisoners, about 150 miles northeast. Despite this major success, higher OSS command did not learn of the
liberation until the 18th when Cardinal finally established a radio connection.
Conditions immediately improved for the Hoten prisoners. One prisoner, Capt. Lloyd Allen, commented “Food got
easier right away” after liberation and that prisoners needing advanced medical aid left within the first
week.11
As the rest of the Cardinal team stabilized conditions at Hoten, Leith and Lamar departed by train on August 18
to rescue the high-ranking prisoners. Japanese escorts provided a first-class rail car, and the pair arrived
early the next morning. There, they liberated prominent prisoners including Lt. Gen. Jonathan Wainwright, Maj.
Gen. Edward King, British Gen. Arthur Percival, and Dutch Governor-Gen. Alidius Starkenborgh.12 Though the prisoners were ready
to depart, poor phone lines and missed calls delayed coordination with Mukden.
Soviet forces arrived on August 25, complicating the return. The Soviets denied them the train. So, they found a
bus. Then a rail line without water for the steam engine. Leith and Lamar didn’t improvise once, they improvised
the entire way back.13 The group
finally reached Mukden in the early hours of August 27.
Cardinal worked to evacuate prisoners as quickly as possible but were forced to triage evacuees due to
insufficient airlift. The bulk went by train to Port Arthur (now Dalian), where the Navy moved them on to
Okinawa for flights home. Very sick prisoners flew to Manila while less-sick patients flew back to the United
States for care. Notable prisoners, like Lt. Gen. Wainwright, flew to take part in the Japanese surrender
ceremony on the battleship Missouri while other high-ranking officers were flown out for debriefing.14
Just as the worst seemed behind them, another problem surfaced: teeth. After years of poor nutrition, many
prisoners could not chew the fresh vegetables or canned food now available. Fortunately, the camp included two
allied dentists. The OSS team seized dental chairs, tools, and supplies from Japanese army hospitals, enabling
immediate treatment.15
With the prisoners safe, Cardinal became something else entirely: America’s first eyes in a region the Soviets
claimed. This OSS intelligence base in Manchuria continued despite strong Soviet reaction to continued American
presence. Multiple sources report that Soviet troops robbed Americans of their watches, rings, and money while
also damaging American aircraft without any accountability.16 Despite the pressure, the OSS were the only American intelligence assets
in Manchuria, reporting on things like the secret arrival of the Chinese Communist forces and other significant
political developments.17 Under
considerable pressure, the Americans took refuge in the French consulate until both the French and Americans
were forced out by the Soviets on October 5.
Cardinal’s mission didn’t end with liberation —It evolved under pressure. From humanitarian relief to
intelligence gathering, the team adapted as conditions shifted and higher command remained distant. Their
ability to operate with initiative, cultural fluency, and tactical restraint in a politically sensitive
environment exemplifies the kind of readiness special operations forces (SOF) must continue to cultivate.
SOME LESSONS
Cardinal did not follow a doctrinal script, and the team did not look like a standard detachment. They had no
comms for nearly two days, operated with a patched-together team, and solved unanticipated problems—like dental
care. Still, they got it done.
Cardinal was the kind of mission that doctrine does not quite know what to do with, but that special operations
get anyway. It was not direct action, unconventional warfare, or foreign internal defense. Army doctrine would
categorize it as a “collateral task”—a catch-all for missions that fall outside the principal tasks. As Field
Manual 3-18 puts it, “Special Forces can perform other tasks of a collateral nature, such as counterdrug
operations and noncombatant evacuation operations.”18 These are the irregular, politically-sensitive assignments that come by
default. Cardinal shows why we need to train for them.
The Cardinal case also highlights the essence of mission command. The team went in knowing they would have no
contact for a while. Then, when they did not check in for two days, no one came looking—They were trusted to
figure it out. Today, that kind of communications blackout is rare. But, the principle holds: Train teams to
think, not wait.
“Special Forces can perform other tasks of a collateral nature, such as counterdrug operations and noncombatant evacuation operations.”18
Field Manual 3-18
Likewise, Cardinal’s six-person team is a study in creative task organization. They did not have the right
people, they had the available ones: two majors, a doctor, a radioman, two linguists, and a foreign officer. And
yet, they built a team, adapted on the fly, and made it work. Special operations forces will continue to face
missions that do not match their manning documents or rehearsal cycles. Attachments will arrive late. Some will
bring SOF experience; many will not. The teams that succeed will be those that integrate fast, build trust
quickly, and move forward
Finally, we should not overlook “the teeth.” Years of malnutrition had left prisoners unable to chew their first
real meals—and solving that meant recognizing the problem, finding camp dentists, raiding Japanese depots, and
setting up a field dental clinic. The lesson is not about dentistry. It is about judgment. Cardinal’s team
identified an unanticipated need and solved it with whatever resources they could find. That is what detachments
do. And, sometimes, the mission turns not on what we rehearse most, but on the skills we rarely touch:
delivering calves, pulling teeth, building bridges, or fixing radios. We must train like those moments matter.
The value of Cardinal lies in what it demands from us today: Preparation for doctrinal edge cases, reinforcement
of mission command, confidence in creative task organization, and fluency in the rarely used skills that may
prove decisive. As special operations forces face uncertain contingencies in the Indo-Pacific and beyond,
leaders and trainers must prepare teams not just for the missions we plan but for the ones we never saw coming.
FIT CARDINAL INTO YOUR TRAINING
Operation Cardinal was not special because it was dramatic. It was special because it demanded the full range of
what makes special operations forces unique: initiative in the absence of guidance, cultural and linguistic
adaptability, improvisation under pressure, and the ability to assemble and lead a nonstandard team in a
politically-sensitive environment. While many readiness exercises test the raid or infiltration techniques, few
assess a detachment’s ability to integrate non-standard specialties or adapt to humanitarian imperatives under
time pressure. This kind of training starts at the detachment, but it succeeds only if company and battalion
leaders build it in.
Modern special operations units can honor their legacy not only by studying missions like Cardinal but by
training for them. A Cardinal-inspired snap exercise could challenge a detachment to plan and execute a
humanitarian or rescue mission with just 48 hours of warning, followed by an unplanned secondary task that
exercises rarely used skills like horizontal construction for the 18C, veterinary or dental care for the 18D.
Add two last-minute augmentees—perhaps a foreign partner or interagency specialist—and test the team’s ability
to integrate, adapt, and succeed.
This does not require more training; it requires smarter training. The 1st Special Forces Group ran quarterly
snap exercises with unknown infiltration methods and non-standard tasks—testing flexibility, improvisation, and
integration under pressure. Events like those could easily add Cardinal-like objectives. The combat training
centers offer another opportunity. Large, complex, and well-resourced, these opportunities are ideally suited
for scenarios like Cardinal, where the challenge is not the raid but what happens after. These exercises also
offer higher headquarters, such as 1st Special Forces Command, a way to evaluate readiness for the ambiguous,
irregular missions that do not fall neatly within doctrinal lines but often land on our shoulders.
We cannot predict the next Cardinal, but we can build the teams that will succeed when it arrives.
REFERENCES:
01. Roger Hilsman, American Guerrilla: My War Behind Japanese Lines
(Washington, D.C: Brasseys, 1990), 230.
02. Maochun Yu, OSS in China: Prelude to Cold War (New
Haven: Yale University Press, 1996), 231.yu
03. Yu, 232.
04. Troy J. Sacquety, “The Office of Strategic Services
(OSS): A Primer on the Special Operations Branches and Detachments of the OSS,” Veritas 3, no. 4 (2007):
50.
05. History Project, Strategic Services Unit, Office of
the Assistant Secretary of War, War Department, The Overseas Targets: War Report of the Office of
Strategic Services, 1976th ed., vol. 2 (New York: Walker and Company, 1976), 457.
06. Yu, OSS in China, 232.
07. Only Troy J. Sacquety, “The Office of Strategic
Services (OSS): A Primer on the Special Operations Branches and Detachments of the OSS,” Veritas 3, no.
4 (2007), http://arsof-history.org/articles/v3n4_oss_primer_page_1.html
mentions the Mercy Missions though C. H. Briscoe, “Major Herbert R. Brucker, SF Pioneer, Part I,”
Veritas 2, no. 2 (2006), http://arsof-history.org/articles/v2n2_brucker_pt1_page_1.html
also mentions Detachment 202’s role in China. The other history related articles on the OSS largely
focused on the OSS in Europe, Detachment 101’s role in Burma, or the resistance led by Brig. Gen Russell
Volckmann in the Philippines. See C. H. Briscoe, “Kachin Rangers: Allied Guerrillas in World War II
Burma,” Special Warfare 14, no. 4 (2002): 35–43; Joseph R. Fischer, “Cut from a Different Cloth: The
Origins of U.S. Army Special Forces,” Special Warfare 8, no. 2 (1995): 28–39; Troy J. Sacquety,
“Strategic Services Unit (SSU) History in the ‘Raw,’” Veritas 5, no. 3 (2009),
http://arsof-history.org/articles/v5n3_history_raw_page_1.html Ian Sutherland, “The OSS (Office
of Strategic Services) Operational Groups: Origin of Army Special Forces,” Special Warfare 15, no. 2
(2002): 2–13; James R. Ward, “Activities of Detachment 101 of the OSS (Office of Strategic Services),”
Special Warfare 6, no. 4 (1993): 14–21; Eugene G. Piasecki, “The History of Special Warfare,” Special
Warfare 28, no. 2 (2015): 8–13.
08. Hal Leith, POWs of Japanese Rescued! (Victoria,
Canada: Trafford, 2003), 11.
09. Leith, 11.
10. Yu, OSS in China, 242.
11. “News Release” (Office of Strategic Services,
September 13, 1945), 2, WARREN A. BOECKLEN PAPERS; BOX 2, FOLDER 10, OSS PRESS RELEASES [PART 1 OF 2],
SEPTEMBER 1945, US Army Heritage and Education Center.
12. Leith, POWs of Japanese Rescued!, 28; Zachary E
Griffiths and Rick Landgraf, “A Prisoner of War’s Old Fashioned,” War on the Rocks, January 31, 2025, http://warontherocks.com/2025/01/a-prisoner-of-wars-old-fashioned/
13. Leith, POWs of Japanese Rescued!, 44–49.
14. Hilsman, American Guerrilla, 244.
15. Hilsman, 242.
16. Yu, OSS in China, 244; Leith, POWs of Japanese
Rescued!, 57.
17. Yu, OSS in China, 244.
18. Department of the Army, Special Forces Operations,
Field Manual 3–18 (Washington, D.C., 2014), 58,
https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_c/pdf/web/fm3_18.pdf
Author:
Lt. Col. Zachary Griffiths will soon command 4th Battalion, 10th Special Forces Group (Airborne). He is a
former White House Fellow.