Wired for Readiness
The Role of Wearable Technology and AI in Military Preventative Medicine
By 2LT Kinley DeSpain and Dr. Hanna Jensen
Article published on: February 1, 2026 in the February 2026 e-Edition of Pulse of Army
Medicine
Read Time: < 13 mins
Figure 1. A prototype of sensor-integrated combat apparel developed through
a collaboration between Aptima, the Air Force Research Laboratory, and the DoD Manufacturing Innovation
Institute NextFlex. Designed for hazardous and confined environments, the garment incorporates embedded
biometric sensors and connectivity features to enhance real-time physiological monitoring and safety in
multi-domain operations.
Photo by Rebecca Ward, U.S. Department of Defense, DVIDS.
Abstract
Wearable technology and AI are emerging as essential tools to advance military preventive care. While
current methods rely on periodic assessments and treatment after problems arise, wearables enable continuous
health monitoring across training and operations. Combined with AI, these systems can detect early signs of
fatigue, dehydration, and body strain, capabilities especially critical during high-tempo missions like
multi-day ruck marches or reconnaissance patrols. This proactive approach transforms health monitoring from
a passive measure into a strategic asset that preserves performance, supports military decision-making, and
protects mission timelines. In line with Army 2030 priorities and the shift toward data-informed
decision-making, wearable technology and AI are poised to reshape the landscape of preventive care in
operational environments. Their integration supports modernization goals outlined in key frameworks such as
the TRADOC Pamphlet 525-3-1, Force Health Protection initiatives, and the Holistic Health and Fitness (H2F)
System, which emphasize optimizing Soldier readiness through personalized and anticipatory care. Integrating
these tools into military medicine will strengthen force health protection, reduce preventable injuries, and
sustain readiness. As the Army prepares for high-tempo, multi-domain operations against near-peer
adversaries, maintaining physiological readiness through real-time monitoring is essential to ensuring
overmatch.
WEARABLE TECHNOLOGY IN HIGH-PERFORMANCE AND MILITARY SETTINGS
Recent studies highlight the growing use of wearable devices in demanding environments. This adoption reflects a
shift toward identifying and mitigating health risks before they escalate. Fitness trackers and biosensors can
effectively monitor small changes in heart rhythm (heart rate variability), skin temperature, and exertion,
providing real-time insights into body strain (Hinde, White, & Armstrong, 2021). Examples of this technology
include the Polar H10 heart rate monitor and the BioStamp sensor platform, which is used for skin temperature
and exertion monitoring. Because most of these devices are portable, they can function outside of clinical
settings, which would help sustain readiness in austere conditions.
In a potential battalion-level training scenario, soldiers could wear hydration and exertion monitors linked to
secure apps. This system could include a Nix Hydration Biosensor patch and a Zephyr BioHarness. If rising skin
temperature and declining hydration are detected, the company medic and platoon sergeant would then receive
concise alerts, and leaders could then rotate affected soldiers into recovery intervals, preventing heat
casualties and maintaining operational tempo without added workload.
ENHANCING PREVENTIVE CARE THROUGH AI AND WEARABLE TECHNOLOGY
AI-powered systems build on basic sensors by analyzing biometric patterns to detect fatigue and stress before
they degrade performance. Continuous monitoring of heart rhythm, sleep, and skin conductance can reveal subtle
declines in performance. Hinde et al. (2021) showed that tracking these metrics helps signal performance drops
early enough to adjust training and prevent injuries. Winslow et al. (2022) found that pairing sensors with AI
improved mental health symptoms among service members.
A potential prolonged security mission is another example of how wearable technology may be incorporated. This
technology enables a squad leader to receive notifications that a team member, who is supposed to stand watch
that night, is trending toward fatigue. Temporarily rotating that soldier out of that watch would help preserve
situational awareness and prevent lapses that could compromise the mission. This proactive approach could
protect both the individual and the team’s effectiveness.
Wearables also help manage hydration, which directly affects clear thinking and reaction time. Soldiers in hot
climates are especially prone to dehydration that undermines readiness. Culver et al. (2019) found hydration
sensors provided timely feedback that helped prompt early interventions during field testing. Building on these
capabilities, AI can further refine alerts by adapting to each soldier’s baseline. For example, during a
multi-day ruck in high heat, wearable sensors could detect electrolyte decline in two soldiers. The platoon
sergeant could receive a secure notification and adjust water intake and rest schedules before symptoms
escalate. Preventing even one dehydration casualty in a deployed setting can avoid a 48-72 hour operational gap,
significant airlift costs, and mission compromise.
LIMITATIONS AND CHALLENGES
Despite these advantages, integrating wearables and AI presents challenges. Privacy remains a primary concern.
Sivakumar, Mone, and Abdumukhtor (2024) emphasize the importance of transparent governance and clear
communication to build trust. Soldiers must understand how their data will be used and protected. Role-based
access, such as appointing a battalion health data manager, ensures commanders receive concise summaries while
medics oversee detailed information to limit the amount of information shared and any potential leaks.
Technical limitations also require planning considerations, weather and terrain. Dust, humidity, temperature
extremes, and electromagnetic interference could all potentially affect accuracy and reliability. To mitigate
these issues, designs should use hardened casings, backup power supplies, and data redundancy protocols to
prevent information loss. Pre-deployment testing can help units identify performance gaps and develop
contingency plans, such as manual hydration checks if sensors fail.
Figure 2. A next-generation wearable patch designed to monitor electrolyte
levels in real time, developed through a collaboration between the Air Force Research Laboratory and
industry partners under the Nano-Bio
Manufacturing Consortium. The device uses AFRL-engineered sensor
materials and microfluidic channels to detect sodium and potassium levels in sweat, transmitting data
wirelessly to support performance optimization in heat and high-stress environments.
Courtesy photo by
GE Global Research, Air Force Research Laboratory, DVIDS.
While integrating this technology into daily operations equips unit leaders with role-specifics and applicable
information, we must try to avoid overloading leaders with data. A way to prevent information overload from
occurring is by delegating which individuals will receive notification access. Dashboards can filter alerts to
show only issues requiring action while medics can manage the full biometric picture. When those small declines
in health are flagged early, leaders can reassign tasks or adjust timelines, maintaining momentum and reducing
non-battle injuries.
Figure 3. A U.S. Space Force Guardian synchronizes data from a wearable
fitness device during an informational session for the Continuous Fitness Assessment (CFA) study, led by the
Air Force Research Laboratory near Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio. As part of the Space Force’s
Holistic Health Approach, the CFA explores replacing traditional fitness tests with continuous physiological
monitoring to support long-term readiness and performance.
Photo by Richard A. Eldridge, U.S. Space
Force, DVIDS.
Cilliers (2020) notes that adversaries could exploit intercepted health data. Robust encryption, secure
transmission channels, and periodic cybersecurity audits should be integrated into any plan. Preparing for these
challenges in advance helps ensure that technology supports operations without creating extra workload or risk.
IMPLEMENTATION PATHWAYS
To build confidence and validate performance of this system, the Army should pursue phased, low-barrier
integration approaches. Collaboration with Brigade Medical Officers can establish protocols aligned with
existing Force Health Protection measures and ensure data workflows complement the current readiness reporting.
Field testing through Holistic Health and Fitness teams will help assess usefulness during training and measure
how early interventions affect readiness and injury prevention.
Integrating this technology into demanding environments, and possibly pre-deployment training, would provide
insights into device durability, user acceptance, and data reliability. Pilot programs in these operational
environments, including Ranger School, Special Forces Assessment, and other Selection courses, would provide
insights into device durability, user acceptance, and data reliability. Programs should collect feedback from
leaders and soldiers to refine dashboards, access controls, and alert thresholds. They could track reductions in
heat-related incidents, monitor changes in medical evacuation rates, or quantify improvements in unit readiness
scores over a six-month period.
While initial investments in devices, training, and cybersecurity infrastructure will be necessary, long-term
cost avoidance from fewer medical evacuations, decreased injury-related downtime, and sustained readiness could
potentially offset implementation expenses. Validating these systems in realistic settings will demonstrate how
early detection reduces non-battle injuries and preserves mission effectiveness.
Leader and Soldier confidence in its wearable technology use is as critical as the device’s system performance.
Therefore, adoption success will depend on how well units trust the technology, perceive value in the alerts,
and understand how their data is collected and protected. Including noncommissioned officer input in dashboard
design and alert thresholds and gathering feedback from small-unit leaders during pilot programs can help ensure
the system supports tactical decision-making. Early, clear evidence of improved readiness and user buy-in can
accelerate adoption across the force.
DIRECTION FOR THE FUTURE
Wearable technology and AI-driven analytics offer the Army an opportunity to modernize preventive care. Shifting
from reactive treatment to continuous and personalized monitoring gives leaders a clear picture of force
readiness, enabling early intervention. Timely detection preserves combat power, reduces preventable injuries,
and prevents mission delays. Future efforts should refine device durability, expand field testing, and establish
secure frameworks for data use. Piloting these systems in Brigade Combat Teams, pre-deployment rotations, or
environments like Ranger School will help validate performance and build trust in the equipment. Ultimately,
integrating wearable technology and AI into preventive care is not just a modernization effort; this is an
investment in a healthier, more resilient force ready to meet the demands of future conflict.
Figure 4. Rangers from the 2nd Ranger Battalion conduct a platoon live-fire
exercise at Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Washington (June 6–10, 2025).
Photo by Spc. Samuel Dreher, U.S.
Army, DVIDS.
REFERENCES
Cilliers, L. (2020). Wearable devices in healthcare: Privacy and information security issues. Health
Information Management Journal, 49(2–3), 150–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1833358319851684
Culver, D. J., Colon, A. B., Washington, D. R., Appleton, M. G., Strang, A., Alizadeh, A., Burns, A.,
Poliks, M., & Tossell, C. C. (2019). Field test of wearable sensors for hydration monitoring. In
2019 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS) (pp. 1–4). IEEE. https://doi.
org/10.1109/SIEDS.2019.8735637
Hinde, K., White, G., & Armstrong, N. (2021). Wearable devices suitable for monitoring twenty-four hour
heart rate variability in military populations. Sensors, 21(4), 1061. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21041061
Sivakumar, C. L. V., Mone, V., & Abdumukhtor, R. (2024). Addressing privacy concerns with wearable
health monitoring technology. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery,
14(3), e1535. https://doi.org/10.1002/ widm.1535
Taylor, N., Carroll, A., & Gifford, R. M. (2025). Five-day evaluation of the acceptability and comfort
of wearable technology at four anatomical locations during military training. BMJ Military Health,
171(3), 245–249. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjmilitary-2023-002245
Winslow, B. D., Kwasinski, R., Hullfish, J., Ruble, M., Lynch, A., Rogers, T., Nofziger, D., Brim, W., &
Woodworth, C. (2022). Automated stress detection using mobile application and wearable sensors improves
symptoms of mental health disorders in military personnel. Frontiers in Digital Health, 4, 919626.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.919626
Authors
Kinley DeSpain, 2LT, U.S. Army is a second-year medical student at the University of
Arkansas for Medical Sciences and a commissioned officer in the U.S. Army through the Health Professions
Scholarship Program (HPSP). She is also pursuing a Master of Public Health with a concentration in Climate,
Rural, and Global Public Health.
Dr. Hanna Jensen, MD, PhD received her medical training and doctorate in her native
Finland, and her general surgical training in Finland and Denmark. At the University of Arkansas for Medical
Sciences, Dr. Jensen teaches the Cardiovascular Module for the College of Medicine and serves as the
clinical research coordinator for the departments of Surgery and Radiology as well as the UAMS Northwest
Regional Campus. Her research includes a DOD-funded project developing a hemorrhage-sensor for battlefield
use.