From Competition to Command Post

Developing Operationally Adroit MP NCOs

By MSG Keith J. Kinnerson, SFC Justin A. Howard, SFC Brooke E. Grether, MSG Robert M. Bunch, and SGM Zach Wriston

Article published on: in the 2026 e-Edition of Military Police

Read Time: < 15 mins

U.S. Army Staff Sgt. Elijah Nash, a corrections and detentions specialist, assigned to 18th Military Police Brigade, representing the 21st Theater Sustainment Command, plots points during night land navigation on day two of of the U.S. Army Europe and Africa Best Squad Competition on U.S. Army Garrison Bavaria in Grafenwoehr, Germany, Aug. 21, 2025. Best Squad Competitions are opportunities for units to showcase their toughest soldiers in competition utilizing events based on physical, technical, and tactical abilities under stress and fatigue. Winners of this competition will advance to compete in the U.S. Army Best Squad Competition. (U.S. Army photo by Pfc. Kadence Connors)

U.S. Army Staff Sgt. Elijah Nash, a corrections and detentions specialist, assigned to 18th Military Police Brigade, representing the 21st Theater Sustainment Command, plots points during night land navigation on day two of of the U.S. Army Europe and Africa Best Squad Competition on U.S. Army Garrison Bavaria in Grafenwoehr, Germany, Aug. 21, 2025. Best Squad Competitions are opportunities for units to showcase their toughest soldiers in competition utilizing events based on physical, technical, and tactical abilities under stress and fatigue. Winners of this competition will advance to compete in the U.S. Army Best Squad Competition. (U.S. Army photo by Pfc. Kadence Connors)

The value of Soldier competitions is easy to recognize. Competitors in Best Warrior, Best Squad, and Military Police competitions—whether volunteers or “voluntolds”—find themselves training, studying, and reflecting on basic, advanced, and military occupational specialty (MOS)-specific tasks. Regardless of the outcome, the professional development in knowledge and maturity lasts long after the competition and throughout their military careers. Eric Milzarski, an Army veteran turned writer, emphasizes that competitors also gain valuable name recognition throughout their formation. He notes that “your chain of command will respect you far more for coming in a hard-fought second place than if you shriveled out of the competition to begin with.”1

There is another, less often discussed benefit to Soldier competitions. Competitions are major events that require dedicated planning, manning, equipping, resourcing, and rehearsing to perform successfully. Army education spans three overlapping domains: operational, institutional, and self-development. 2 3 4 What the battle-staff noncommissioned officer (NCO) course provides in a classroom—preparing NCOs to operate effectively on a staff through missions, duties, responsibilities, plans, and orders—is mirrored in Soldier competitions, which place NCOs in the short-suspense, high-demand reality of an NCO-driven mission. 5 6 Soldier competitions empower NCOs to experience results-driven planning and operations, preparing them for complex expeditionary operations through competing, planning, manning, resourcing, and equipping.

16th Military Police Brigade Soldiers exercise their combat water survival skills during the brigade’s Best Squad Competition at Fort Liberty, N.C., on Oct. 17, 2023. The 16th Military Police Brigade provides garrison law enforcement and force protection to all of its communities and continues training in its combat support mission.

16th Military Police Brigade Soldiers exercise their combat water survival skills during the brigade’s Best Squad Competition at Fort Liberty, N.C., on Oct. 17, 2023. The 16th Military Police Brigade provides garrison law enforcement and force protection to all of its communities and continues training in its combat support mission.

Competing

Competing in a best-warrior competition (BWC) or squad competition can significantly change competitors’ perspectives, motivations, and daily routines. The approach to success has remained consistent over the years. In the 200th Military Police Command’s inaugural competition in 2009, Brandon Harp, the junior enlisted winner and runner-up in the Army Reserve competition, committed to daily ruck marches, five-mile runs, abundant push-ups, and constant study of warrior tasks and training manuals.7

A decade later, in 2019, Specialist Keylin Perez prepared similarly for a division-wide competition with over fifty competitors. Now, First Lieutenant Perez credits her NCOs for training, preparing, and supporting her throughout. “My BWC experience was phenomenal, especially the preparation, thanks to my NCOs and the supportive cadre,” First Lieutenant Perez said.8

Sergeant Major Brian Disque advises competitors to prepare mentally, physically, and emotionally for rigorous competitions, warning of the shock experienced by the unprepared. “After the first 24 hours, the look of shock on their faces suggested they were woefully unprepared.” 9 Soldier competitions highlight the importance of planning and troop leading procedures (TLP), but few NCOs are ready for the behind-the-scenes challenges. Military police operations demand leaders who can think systemically, communicate clearly, and adapt quickly. Soldier competitions cultivate these capabilities through experiential learning.

Cpl. Layne Aaron and CPL Steffes Thomas 511th MP PLT, perform Combatives Task on March 8, 2013, inside Camp Darby post gym during 2013 Best Warrior Competition under the supervision of SGT Nickels.(Photo by Vincenzo Vitiello)

Cpl. Layne Aaron and CPL Steffes Thomas 511th MP PLT, perform Combatives Task on March 8, 2013, inside Camp Darby post gym during 2013 Best Warrior Competition under the supervision of SGT Nickels.(Photo by Vincenzo Vitiello)

Operations

For three years, the NCOs of the 300th Military Police Brigade led three combined brigade-level and two division-level competitions involving hundreds of competitors and cadre. The lessons learned during low-risk, high-stress events turned into tangible results during their 2021–2022 mobilization to Guantanamo Bay (GTMO), Cuba. While the competitors are in the spotlight, often literally, the Headquarters and Headquarters Company NCOs developed critical and creative-thinking skills as they planned multiple simultaneous and continuous events. Competitions serve as practical exercises in mission command, empowering NCOs to make decisions and synchronize resources with live operations.10NCOs who plan and execute competitions develop confidence in their ability to manage complexity and uncertainty. These experiences prepare leaders for future roles in operations sections, command posts, and other developmental staff settings. These NCOs gain a better understanding of how people, resources, and time interact, thus increasing their understanding to better support commanders and enable mission success under challenging circumstances in the future.

Planning

Small-unit leaders use TLP to analyze missions, develop plans, and prepare for operations.1112 Focusing on the eight TLP exercises, the Army’s problem-solving methodology, and the operations process ultimately develops small-unit leaders’ effective planning capabilities. In general, a small planning team will oversee individual events, such as a small-arms range. In complex Soldier competitions, there are frequently more than ten separate events, each requiring a noncommissioned officer in charge (NCOIC), safety NCOs, medical personnel, support NCOs, and role players. There is no competition without successfully orchestrating separate training events—simultaneously coordinated, planned, rehearsed, and executed in a seamless sequence that places significant demands on both the competitors and cadre.13

NCOs who take on the responsibility of planning competition events from “cradle to grave” often find the experience incredibly empowering. This comprehensive involvement allows them to exercise leadership, creativity, and critical thinking skills at every stage, from “receipt of mission” through execution and on to “supervise and refine” through an after-action review. In doing so, they gain a sense of accomplishment and ownership while also tapping into the inherent spirit of competition that drives excellence and camaraderie.14The process instills confidence and underscores the importance of meticulous planning and coordination, reinforcing their pivotal role as leaders within the military police structure.15 16 This holistic, integrated approach to operational planning fosters a deep connection to their mission and enhances their professional growth and development. TLPs prescribe a framework to enable this planning. From land and ammunition requests to competitor throughput considerations and regulatory adherence, NCOs must consider many planning factors and mission variables: mission, (notional) enemy, terrain and weather, civil considerations, time available, and especially troops and support available.17

Manning and Resourcing

As planning progresses, managing the troops and support required for the competition becomes a monumental task. It involves casting a wide net to find capable and knowledgeable NCOs. Determining adequate manning and resourcing is critical to the planning process of Soldier competitions.18Large-scale competitions require significant coordination of resources, real-estate, and funding. The Army Reserve receives funding for training, not competitions. Every training dollar is essential to mission success. The give-and-take of negotiating for these precious funds with the G-8, Deputy Chief of Staff for Resources and Materiel, will unnerve the most hardened NCO.

Far too often during the Global War on Terror (GWOT) era, Soldiers and units expected to “fall” into pre-positioned equipment, barracks, vehicles, and facilities. The systematic rotations eliminated the need for the kind of troubleshooting once required of the expeditionary deployers during the early years of GWOT.19Working long hours in the operations cell to support 24/7 competitions forced NCOs to think logistically to accomplish the mission and to focus on “reacting rapidly to crises or opportunities.”20

Real-estate and logistical requirements of a division-sized Soldier competition will challenge logisticians and planners to meet the demands of the competition economically. Competitions require all the elements of an expeditionary deployment: weapons, vehicles, radios, feeding, fueling, and lodging.21Understanding and executing the processes required in competition prepare NCOs to “recapture their ability to deploy rapidly with no notice.”22NCOs developing plans and executing the mission quickly learn the consequences of poorly planned and coordinated feeding schedules or running out of coffee or toilet paper. Because the cadre is typically a small entity, the operations and sustainment cells must think logistically, economically, and operationally. Military police planners must “anticipate events and adapt to changing circumstances” in real-time.23These low-risk negative consequences—such as unexpected shortages or food delivered to the wrong training area—prompt immediate feedback from competitors, cadre, and command sergeants major, and they teach lessons that improve future training and operations.

U.S. Army Sgt. 1st Class Shane Hope (left), an explosive ordnance disposal specialist, and Pvt. Gabriel Perez, a chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear specialist assigned to the 18th Military Police Brigade, representing the 21st Theater Sustainment Command, camouflage themselves during day two of the U.S. Army Europe and Africa Best Squad Competition on U.S. Army Garrison Bavaria in Grafenwoehr, Germany, Aug. 21, 2025. Best Squad Competitions are opportunities for units to showcase their toughest soldiers in competition utilizing events based on physical, technical, and tactical abilities under stress and fatigue. Winners of this competition will advance to compete in the U.S. Army Best Squad Competition. (U.S. Army photo by Pfc. Kadence Connors)

U.S. Army Sgt. 1st Class Shane Hope (left), an explosive ordnance disposal specialist, and Pvt. Gabriel Perez, a chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear specialist assigned to the 18th Military Police Brigade, representing the 21st Theater Sustainment Command, camouflage themselves during day two of the U.S. Army Europe and Africa Best Squad Competition on U.S. Army Garrison Bavaria in Grafenwoehr, Germany, Aug. 21, 2025. Best Squad Competitions are opportunities for units to showcase their toughest soldiers in competition utilizing events based on physical, technical, and tactical abilities under stress and fatigue. Winners of this competition will advance to compete in the U.S. Army Best Squad Competition. (U.S. Army photo by Pfc. Kadence Connors)

Training and Results

Planning and supervising competition events enhanced the cadre’s leadership, mission essential tasks, and warfighting skills.24 As the cadre connected the critical training value of simulated, fluid, real-world activities and scenarios that mimic the stress and fatigue of war, it became evident that upholding operational and training standards was paramount.25 1SG Jonathan Mazariegos, remarked how his experience supporting the brigade’s competitions enabled him as a senior NCO to refine critical mentoring capabilities in a controlled environment.26 27 “I could not be static in my knowledge. I constantly improved my skills to ensure task accuracy and fairness in evaluating. This allowed me to mentor less experienced Soldiers during competitions and later deployments.”28

During the events, the cadre also learned the value of increasing capacity and achieving unity of effort while working with other military police brigades, the 200th Military Police Command, and the United States Army Reserve Legal Command (USARLC).29Sergeant Anna Ickes credited her experience planning and supporting the competition with teaching her the importance of relationship-building and networking across organizations. “I learned more in-depth about Chemical, Biological, Nuclear, Radiological, and Explosive (CBRNE) and medical capabilities through my experience, which helped me to understand the bigger picture. This was invaluable when I deployed and was assigned to an unfamiliar role supporting detention operations,” Sergeant Ickes said.30

Soldiers apply camouflage during the U.S. Army Europe and Africa Best Squad Competition in Germany.

U.S. Army 1st Lt. Chayse Garret, a military police officer assigned to the 615th Military Police Company, 709th Military Police Battalion, 18th Military Police Brigade, assembles the M249 squad automatic weapon under night vision goggles during the 709th Military Police Battalion Quarter Board Competition at U.S. Army Garrison Stuttgart, Germany, Dec. 2, 2025. The event evaluates Soldiers on essential tasks and warrior skills ahead of the 18th Military Police Brigade Best Squad Competition. (U.S. Army photo by Sgt. 1st Class Tanisha Karn)

One of the most significant results among the cadre was learning to “understand, visualize, and describe problems and approaches to solving them.”31 32 When Soldiers understand the “big picture” for their organization’s training goals, they are energized to strive to do more. Supporting Soldier competitions provided more opportunities to learn and gain confidence. Operations NCOs develop critical cognitive skills as they problem-solve dynamic challenges in a controlled training environment.33 It also provided the essential experience of the operational domain necessary

to develop muscle memory in future positions. “The more involved with operations I became, the more I valued the Army. When I deployed as the joint medical group operations NCOIC, I still had much to learn, but I was far more prepared than my peers,” Sergeant First Class Brooke Grether said.34Operational effectiveness is achieved more quickly by sharing the best practices and common pitfalls, so the Military Police Corps may rise and succeed together.

A military police Soldier conducts a blood sweep on a simulated casualty during a medical lane evaluation.

U.S. Army Pfc. Jordan Montes, a military police officer assigned to the U.S. Army Pfc. Jordan Montes, a military police officer assigned to the 527th Military Police Company, 709th Military Police Battalion, 18th Military Police Brigade, conducts a blood sweep on a simulated casualty to safety on the medical lane during the 709th Military Police Battalion Quarter Board Competition at U.S. Army Garrison Stuttgart, Germany, Dec. 1, 2025. The event evaluates Soldiers on essential tasks and warrior skills ahead of the 18th Military Police Brigade Best Squad Competition. (U.S. Army photo by Sgt. 1st Class Tanisha Karn) Company, 709th Military Police Battalion, 18th Military Police Brigade, conducts a blood sweep on a simulated casualty to safety on the medical lane during the 709th Military Police Battalion Quarter Board Competition at U.S. Army Garrison Stuttgart, Germany, Dec. 1, 2025. The event evaluates Soldiers on essential tasks and warrior skills ahead of the 18th Military Police Brigade Best Squad Competition. (U.S. Army photo by Sgt. 1st Class Tanisha Karn)

Best Practices and Common Pitfalls

Several best practices consistently stand out across effective Soldier competitions. Treating competitions as real-world missions enables deliberate planning, rehearsals, and mission orders. Viewing competitions as operations reinforces discipline and realism for planners and improves the overall experience for competitors. The best way to ensure appropriate coordination during competition execution is to conduct a daily synchronization meeting, generally in the evening, with enough time to coordinate assets across training events. This sync meeting is a no-fail coordination point for all cadre across the competition to ensure success in the next day’s training. Assigning meaningful responsibility to NCOs and allowing them to exercise disciplined initiative within intent drives leader development through trust and confidence. Empowering NCOs to “own” their respective training events enable planning growth for all cadre involved.

It is also paramount to plan sustainment deliberately. Feeding, transportation, and medical coverage deserve the same attention as training events. Synchronizing these three, along with communications, is another paramount factor in running a smooth competition. Including sustainers in all phases of planning, coordinating, and conducting training instills an operational mindset that will reap benefits long after the competition. Lastly, knowledge management is a must. NCOs must be deliberate in capturing lessons learned through after-action reviews, which institutionalize learning, improve future performance, and prevent the same pitfalls from occurring again.

A few common pitfalls, such as failing to delegate, inadequate planning, and resourcing, undermine the developmental value of Soldier competitions. Failing to delegate planning requirements can hinder the quality of any event, and competitions are no different. Each training event should include an NCOIC, a range safety officer, a dedicated medic, and support personnel. Conduct planning check-ins and provide guidance in accordance with training timelines, but otherwise, let those NCOs own the event. Failing to empower those NCOs responsible for training events can also prove costly. They must understand it is their responsibility to plan, resource, and execute the entirety of their mission. The quality of each individual event results from adequate and necessary cadre preparation. Overlooking sustainment details also impacts on the quality of training events and can have second-and third-order effects when timeliness across a competition is key. As discussed above, attention to all logistics requirements is as important as training events. Experiential learning allows NCOs to develop skills that cannot be achieved any other way. Overall, recognizing and mitigating these pitfalls improves competition quality and leader development.

Conclusion

Soldier competition programs are NCO-driven operations designed to develop and strengthen the force. It is shortsighted to view competitions solely from the perspective of competitor development or to dismiss them as a “dog and pony show.” Commanders recognize competitors through accolades and organizational pride, and rightly so. Well-organized competitions test the skills, planning, operations, and perseverance of far more NCOs who are performing critical functions behind the scenes. The staff NCOs behind the competitive events will improve day-to-day operations and hone their organizations’ mission focus long after the best squads go home.

Officers and NCOs conduct a board as part of a Best Squad Competition assessment at Fort Drum.

Army 2nd Lt. Michael Page (center), a platoon leader with 563rd Military Police Company, 91st Military Police Battalion, attends a board at the 91st Military Police Battalion headquarters on Fort Drum, N.Y., March 7, 2023. This event was conducted as part of a best squad competition designed to assess Soldiers on technical and tactical proficiency and teamwork. (U.S. Army photo by Sgt. Kevin Dunnaway)

Notes

1. Eric Milzarski, “This Is Why ‘Best Soldier’ Competitions Actually Matter for Junior Enlisted,” We Are The Mighty, May 16, 2021, https://www.wearethemighty.com/mighty-trending/best-soldier-competition-perks/

2. Department of the Army, Training (ADP 7-0), (Department of the Army, 2024b), 2.

3. Department of the Army, Military Police Operations (FM 3-39), (Department of the Army, 2025a), 1.

4. Department of the Army, The Noncommissioned Officer’s Guide (TC 7-22.7), (Department of the Army, 2025b), 40.

5. NCO Worldwide, “Battle Staff Noncommissioned Officer Course,” NCO Worldwide, accessed 2024, https://www.ncoworldwide.army.mil/academics/battle-staff/

6. Department of the Army, Planning and Orders Production (FM 5-0), (2024a), 1.

7. Darius Kirkwood, “200th MP Soldier Runner-up at Best Warrior Competition,” www.army.mil, August 9, 2009, https://www.army.mil/article/25638/200th_mp_soldier_runner_up_at_best_warrior_competition

8. K. Perez, personal communication, February 2024.

9. Brian Disque, “Best-Warrior Competition: A Guide on How to Win,” The NCO Journal, January 9, 2019, https://www.armypress.army.mil/journals/nco-journal/archives/2019/january/best-warrior-competition/

10. Department of the Army, Military Police Operations (FM 3-39), (Department of the Army, 2025a), 104, 142.

11. Department of the Army, Planning and Orders Production (FM 5-0), (2024a), 149.

12. Department of the Army, The Noncommissioned Officer’s Guide (TC 7-22.7), (Department of the Army, 2025b), 40.

13. Department of the Army, Planning and Orders Production (FM 5-0), (2024a), 150–151.

14. Joint Chiefs of Staff, Joint Planning (JP 5-0), (2024), VI-10.

15. Department of the Army, Planning and Orders Production (FM 5-0), (2024a), 153.

16. Department of the Army, Military Police Operations (FM 3-39), (Department of the Army, 2025a), 83, 86.

17. Department of the Army, Military Police Operations (FM 3-39), (Department of the Army, 2025a), 9–10.

18. Department of the Army, Planning and Orders Production (FM 5-0), (2024a), 126.

19. Arpi Dilanian and Taiwo Akiwowo, 2016, “Is the Army Ready for Expeditionary Operations?” Army Sustainment, May–June, 33, https://alu.army.mil/alog/2016/mayjun16/pdf/16618.pdf

20. Department of the Army, Military Police Operations (FM 3-39), (Department of the Army, 2025a), 106.

21. Department of the Army, ADP 1-0 The Army, edited by M. A. Milley and M. F. Averill, Washington, DC: Department of the Army, 2019, 2–7.

22. Arpi Dilanian and Taiwo Akiwowo, 2016, “Is the Army Ready for Expeditionary Operations?” Army Sustainment, May–June, 33, https://alu.army.mil/alog/2016/mayjun16/pdf/16618.pdf

23. Department of the Army, Military Police Operations (FM 3-39), (Department of the Army, 2025a), 83.

24. Randy George, Gary Brito, and Michael Weimer, 2023, “Strengthening the Profession: A Call to All Army Leaders to Refresh Our Professional Discourse,” September 11, 2023, https://mwi.westpoint.edu/strengthening-the-profession-a-call-to-all-army-leaders-to-revitalize-our-professional-discourse/

25. Department of the Army, Training (ADP 7-0), (Department of the Army, 2024b), 3.

26. Department of the Army, Military Police Operations (FM 3-39), (Department of the Army, 2025a), 125, 132, 163.

27. Department of the Army, The Noncommissioned Officer’s Guide (TC 7-22.7), (Department of the Army, 2025b), 32.

28. J. Mazareigos, personal communication, December 2024.

29. Joint Chiefs of Staff, Joint Campaigns and Operations (JP 3-0), (2022), IV-47.

30. A. Ickes, personal communication, March 2024.

31. Department of the Army, Planning and Orders Production (FM 5-0), (2024a), 22.

32. Department of the Army, Military Police Operations (FM 3-39), (Department of the Army, 2025a), 93.

33. Joint Chiefs of Staff, Joint Campaigns and Operations (JP 3-0), (2022), IV-1.

34. B. Grether, personal communication, December 2024.

Authors

Master Sergeant Keith J. Kinnerson is currently a student at the Sergeants Major Academy. His last assignment was as the first sergeant of NCO Academy, Fort McCoy, Wisconsin with prior positions in various military police and training units. He holds a master’s degree in education from Malone University.

Sergeant First Class Brooke E. Grether is a combat medic and operations NCO with the 139th Medical Brigade, Independence, Missouri. She is also a registered nurse at University Health Truman Metropolitan Community College, Penn Valley Medical Center in Kansas City, Missouri. She holds an associate’s degree in applied science.

Sergeant First Class Justin A. Howard is a logistician and recruiter in Kalamazoo, Michigan. He holds a bachelor’s degree in general studies from Southern New Hampshire University and is pursuing a master’s degree in business administration from the same institution.

Sergeant Major Zach Wriston is an assistant professor in the Department of Joint, Interagency, Intergovernmental, and Multinational Operations (DJIIMO) at the Sergeants Major Academy, Fort Bliss, Texas. He holds master’s degrees in education from Pennsylvania State University and public policy from Liberty University.

Master Sergeant Robert M. Bunch is the course manager for Basic Leader Course, 168th Regiment (RTI), Fort Carson, Colorado. During his 25-year career, he has served in a variety of military police operations and leadership positions, deployed multiple times, and led the 200th MPC BWC for four years. He holds a bachelor’s degree from American Military University and is completing a master’s degree in organizational leadership from Columbia Southern.