From Competition to Command Post
Developing Operationally Adroit MP NCOs
By MSG Keith J. Kinnerson, SFC Justin A. Howard, SFC Brooke E. Grether,
MSG Robert M. Bunch, and SGM Zach Wriston
Article published on:
in the 2026 e-Edition of
Military Police
Read Time:
< 15 mins
U.S. Army Staff Sgt. Elijah Nash, a corrections and detentions
specialist, assigned to 18th Military Police Brigade, representing the
21st Theater Sustainment Command, plots points during night land
navigation on day two of of the U.S. Army Europe and Africa Best Squad
Competition on U.S. Army Garrison Bavaria in Grafenwoehr, Germany, Aug.
21, 2025. Best Squad Competitions are opportunities for units to
showcase their toughest soldiers in competition utilizing events based
on physical, technical, and tactical abilities under stress and fatigue.
Winners of this competition will advance to compete in the U.S. Army
Best Squad Competition.
(U.S. Army photo by Pfc. Kadence Connors)
The value of Soldier competitions is easy to recognize. Competitors in
Best Warrior, Best Squad, and Military Police competitions—whether
volunteers or “voluntolds”—find themselves training, studying, and
reflecting on basic, advanced, and military occupational specialty
(MOS)-specific tasks. Regardless of the outcome, the professional
development in knowledge and maturity lasts long after the competition and
throughout their military careers. Eric Milzarski, an Army veteran turned
writer, emphasizes that competitors also gain valuable name recognition
throughout their formation. He notes that “your chain of command will
respect you far more for coming in a hard-fought second place than if you
shriveled out of the competition to begin with.”1
There is another, less often discussed benefit to Soldier competitions.
Competitions are major events that require dedicated planning, manning,
equipping, resourcing, and rehearsing to perform successfully. Army
education spans three overlapping domains: operational, institutional, and
self-development.
2
3
4 What
the battle-staff noncommissioned officer (NCO) course provides in a
classroom—preparing NCOs to operate effectively on a staff through
missions, duties, responsibilities, plans, and orders—is mirrored in
Soldier competitions, which place NCOs in the short-suspense, high-demand
reality of an NCO-driven mission.
5
6 Soldier
competitions empower NCOs to experience results-driven planning and
operations, preparing them for complex expeditionary operations through
competing, planning, manning, resourcing, and equipping.
16th Military Police Brigade Soldiers exercise their combat water
survival skills during the brigade’s Best Squad Competition at Fort
Liberty, N.C., on Oct. 17, 2023. The 16th Military Police Brigade
provides garrison law enforcement and force protection to all of its
communities and continues training in its combat support mission.
Competing
Competing in a best-warrior competition (BWC) or squad competition can
significantly change competitors’ perspectives, motivations, and daily
routines. The approach to success has remained consistent over the years.
In the 200th Military Police Command’s inaugural competition in 2009,
Brandon Harp, the junior enlisted winner and runner-up in the Army Reserve
competition, committed to daily ruck marches, five-mile runs, abundant
push-ups, and constant study of warrior tasks and training manuals.7
A decade later, in 2019, Specialist Keylin Perez prepared similarly for a
division-wide competition with over fifty competitors. Now, First
Lieutenant Perez credits her NCOs for training, preparing, and supporting
her throughout. “My BWC experience was phenomenal, especially the
preparation, thanks to my NCOs and the supportive cadre,” First Lieutenant
Perez said.8
Sergeant Major Brian Disque advises competitors to prepare mentally,
physically, and emotionally for rigorous competitions, warning of the
shock experienced by the unprepared. “After the first 24 hours, the look
of shock on their faces suggested they were woefully unprepared.”
9 Soldier
competitions highlight the importance of planning and troop leading
procedures (TLP), but few NCOs are ready for the behind-the-scenes
challenges. Military police operations demand leaders who can think
systemically, communicate clearly, and adapt quickly. Soldier competitions
cultivate these capabilities through experiential learning.
Cpl. Layne Aaron and CPL Steffes Thomas 511th MP PLT, perform Combatives
Task on March 8, 2013, inside Camp Darby post gym during 2013 Best
Warrior Competition under the supervision of SGT Nickels.(Photo by Vincenzo Vitiello)
Operations
For three years, the NCOs of the 300th Military Police Brigade led three
combined brigade-level and two division-level competitions involving
hundreds of competitors and cadre. The lessons learned during low-risk,
high-stress events turned into tangible results during their 2021–2022
mobilization to Guantanamo Bay (GTMO), Cuba. While the competitors are in
the spotlight, often literally, the Headquarters and Headquarters Company
NCOs developed critical and creative-thinking skills as they planned
multiple simultaneous and continuous events. Competitions serve as
practical exercises in mission command, empowering NCOs to make decisions
and synchronize resources with live operations.10NCOs who plan and execute competitions develop confidence in their
ability to manage complexity and uncertainty. These experiences prepare
leaders for future roles in operations sections, command posts, and other
developmental staff settings. These NCOs gain a better understanding of
how people, resources, and time interact, thus increasing their
understanding to better support commanders and enable mission success
under challenging circumstances in the future.
Planning
Small-unit leaders use TLP to analyze missions, develop plans, and prepare
for operations.1112
Focusing on the eight TLP exercises, the Army’s problem-solving
methodology, and the operations process ultimately develops small-unit
leaders’ effective planning capabilities. In general, a small planning
team will oversee individual events, such as a small-arms range. In
complex Soldier competitions, there are frequently more than ten separate
events, each requiring a noncommissioned officer in charge (NCOIC), safety
NCOs, medical personnel, support NCOs, and role players. There is no
competition without successfully orchestrating separate training
events—simultaneously coordinated, planned, rehearsed, and executed in a
seamless sequence that places significant demands on both the competitors
and cadre.13
NCOs who take on the responsibility of planning competition events from
“cradle to grave” often find the experience incredibly empowering. This
comprehensive involvement allows them to exercise leadership, creativity,
and critical thinking skills at every stage, from “receipt of mission”
through execution and on to “supervise and refine” through an after-action
review. In doing so, they gain a sense of accomplishment and ownership
while also tapping into the inherent spirit of competition that drives
excellence and camaraderie.14The process instills confidence and underscores the importance of
meticulous planning and coordination, reinforcing their pivotal role as
leaders within the military police structure.15
16 This
holistic, integrated approach to operational planning fosters a deep
connection to their mission and enhances their professional growth and
development. TLPs prescribe a framework to enable this planning. From land
and ammunition requests to competitor throughput considerations and
regulatory adherence, NCOs must consider many planning factors and mission
variables: mission, (notional) enemy, terrain and weather, civil
considerations, time available, and especially troops and support
available.17
Manning and Resourcing
As planning progresses, managing the troops and support required for the
competition becomes a monumental task. It involves casting a wide net to
find capable and knowledgeable NCOs. Determining adequate manning and
resourcing is critical to the planning process of Soldier competitions.18Large-scale competitions require significant coordination of resources,
real-estate, and funding. The Army Reserve receives funding for training,
not competitions. Every training dollar is essential to mission success.
The give-and-take of negotiating for these precious funds with the G-8,
Deputy Chief of Staff for Resources and Materiel, will unnerve the most
hardened NCO.
Far too often during the Global War on Terror (GWOT) era, Soldiers and
units expected to “fall” into pre-positioned equipment, barracks,
vehicles, and facilities. The systematic rotations eliminated the need for
the kind of troubleshooting once required of the expeditionary deployers
during the early years of GWOT.19Working long hours in the operations cell to support 24/7 competitions
forced NCOs to think logistically to accomplish the mission and to focus
on “reacting rapidly to crises or opportunities.”20
Real-estate and logistical requirements of a division-sized Soldier
competition will challenge logisticians and planners to meet the demands
of the competition economically. Competitions require all the elements of
an expeditionary deployment: weapons, vehicles, radios, feeding, fueling,
and lodging.21Understanding and executing the processes required in competition prepare
NCOs to “recapture their ability to deploy rapidly with no notice.”22NCOs developing plans and executing the mission quickly learn the
consequences of poorly planned and coordinated feeding schedules or
running out of coffee or toilet paper. Because the cadre is typically a
small entity, the operations and sustainment cells must think
logistically, economically, and operationally. Military police planners
must “anticipate events and adapt to changing circumstances” in
real-time.23These low-risk negative consequences—such as unexpected shortages or food
delivered to the wrong training area—prompt immediate feedback from
competitors, cadre, and command sergeants major, and they teach lessons
that improve future training and operations.
U.S. Army Sgt. 1st Class Shane Hope (left), an explosive ordnance
disposal specialist, and Pvt. Gabriel Perez, a chemical, biological,
radiological, and nuclear specialist assigned to the 18th Military
Police Brigade, representing the 21st Theater Sustainment Command,
camouflage themselves during day two of the U.S. Army Europe and Africa
Best Squad Competition on U.S. Army Garrison Bavaria in Grafenwoehr,
Germany, Aug. 21, 2025. Best Squad Competitions are opportunities for
units to showcase their toughest soldiers in competition utilizing
events based on physical, technical, and tactical abilities under stress
and fatigue. Winners of this competition will advance to compete in the
U.S. Army Best Squad Competition.
(U.S. Army photo by Pfc. Kadence Connors)
Training and Results
Planning and supervising competition events enhanced the cadre’s
leadership, mission essential tasks, and warfighting skills.24
As the cadre connected the critical training value of simulated, fluid,
real-world activities and scenarios that mimic the stress and fatigue of
war, it became evident that upholding operational and training standards
was paramount.25
1SG Jonathan Mazariegos, remarked how his experience supporting the
brigade’s competitions enabled him as a senior NCO to refine critical
mentoring capabilities in a controlled environment.26
27 “I
could not be static in my knowledge. I constantly improved my skills to
ensure task accuracy and fairness in evaluating. This allowed me to mentor
less experienced Soldiers during competitions and later deployments.”28
During the events, the cadre also learned the value of increasing capacity
and achieving unity of effort while working with other military police
brigades, the 200th Military Police Command, and the United States Army
Reserve Legal Command (USARLC).29Sergeant Anna Ickes credited her experience planning and supporting the
competition with teaching her the importance of relationship-building and
networking across organizations. “I learned more in-depth about Chemical,
Biological, Nuclear, Radiological, and Explosive (CBRNE) and medical
capabilities through my experience, which helped me to understand the
bigger picture. This was invaluable when I deployed and was assigned to an
unfamiliar role supporting detention operations,” Sergeant Ickes said.30
U.S. Army 1st Lt. Chayse Garret, a military police officer assigned to
the 615th Military Police Company, 709th Military Police Battalion, 18th
Military Police Brigade, assembles the M249 squad automatic weapon under
night vision goggles during the 709th Military Police Battalion Quarter
Board Competition at U.S. Army Garrison Stuttgart, Germany, Dec. 2,
2025. The event evaluates Soldiers on essential tasks and warrior skills
ahead of the 18th Military Police Brigade Best Squad Competition.
(U.S. Army photo by Sgt. 1st Class Tanisha Karn)
One of the most significant results among the cadre was learning to
“understand, visualize, and describe problems and approaches to solving
them.”31
32 When
Soldiers understand the “big picture” for their organization’s training
goals, they are energized to strive to do more. Supporting Soldier
competitions provided more opportunities to learn and gain confidence.
Operations NCOs develop critical cognitive skills as they problem-solve
dynamic challenges in a controlled training environment.33
It also provided the essential experience of the operational domain
necessary
to develop muscle memory in future positions. “The more involved with
operations I became, the more I valued the Army. When I deployed as the
joint medical group operations NCOIC, I still had much to learn, but I was
far more prepared than my peers,” Sergeant First Class Brooke Grether
said.34Operational effectiveness is achieved more quickly by sharing the best
practices and common pitfalls, so the Military Police Corps may rise and
succeed together.
U.S. Army Pfc. Jordan Montes, a military police officer assigned to the
U.S. Army Pfc. Jordan Montes, a military police officer assigned to the
527th Military Police Company, 709th Military Police Battalion, 18th
Military Police Brigade, conducts a blood sweep on a simulated casualty
to safety on the medical lane during the 709th Military Police Battalion
Quarter Board Competition at U.S. Army Garrison Stuttgart, Germany, Dec.
1, 2025. The event evaluates Soldiers on essential tasks and warrior
skills ahead of the 18th Military Police Brigade Best Squad Competition.
(U.S. Army photo by Sgt. 1st Class Tanisha Karn) Company, 709th Military
Police Battalion, 18th Military Police Brigade, conducts a blood sweep
on a simulated casualty to safety on the medical lane during the 709th
Military Police Battalion Quarter Board Competition at U.S. Army
Garrison Stuttgart, Germany, Dec. 1, 2025. The event evaluates Soldiers
on essential tasks and warrior skills ahead of the 18th Military Police
Brigade Best Squad Competition.
(U.S. Army photo by Sgt. 1st Class Tanisha Karn)
Best Practices and Common Pitfalls
Several best practices consistently stand out across effective Soldier
competitions. Treating competitions as real-world missions enables
deliberate planning, rehearsals, and mission orders. Viewing competitions
as operations reinforces discipline and realism for planners and improves
the overall experience for competitors. The best way to ensure appropriate
coordination during competition execution is to conduct a daily
synchronization meeting, generally in the evening, with enough time to
coordinate assets across training events. This sync meeting is a no-fail
coordination point for all cadre across the competition to ensure success
in the next day’s training. Assigning meaningful responsibility to NCOs
and allowing them to exercise disciplined initiative within intent drives
leader development through trust and confidence. Empowering NCOs to “own”
their respective training events enable planning growth for all cadre
involved.
It is also paramount to plan sustainment deliberately. Feeding,
transportation, and medical coverage deserve the same attention as
training events. Synchronizing these three, along with communications, is
another paramount factor in running a smooth competition. Including
sustainers in all phases of planning, coordinating, and conducting
training instills an operational mindset that will reap benefits long
after the competition. Lastly, knowledge management is a must. NCOs must
be deliberate in capturing lessons learned through after-action reviews,
which institutionalize learning, improve future performance, and prevent
the same pitfalls from occurring again.
A few common pitfalls, such as failing to delegate, inadequate planning,
and resourcing, undermine the developmental value of Soldier competitions.
Failing to delegate planning requirements can hinder the quality of any
event, and competitions are no different. Each training event should
include an NCOIC, a range safety officer, a dedicated medic, and support
personnel. Conduct planning check-ins and provide guidance in accordance
with training timelines, but otherwise, let those NCOs own the event.
Failing to empower those NCOs responsible for training events can also
prove costly. They must understand it is their responsibility to plan,
resource, and execute the entirety of their mission. The quality of each
individual event results from adequate and necessary cadre preparation.
Overlooking sustainment details also impacts on the quality of training
events and can have second-and third-order effects when timeliness across
a competition is key. As discussed above, attention to all logistics
requirements is as important as training events. Experiential learning
allows NCOs to develop skills that cannot be achieved any other way.
Overall, recognizing and mitigating these pitfalls improves competition
quality and leader development.
Conclusion
Soldier competition programs are NCO-driven operations designed to develop
and strengthen the force. It is shortsighted to view competitions solely
from the perspective of competitor development or to dismiss them as a
“dog and pony show.” Commanders recognize competitors through accolades
and organizational pride, and rightly so. Well-organized competitions test
the skills, planning, operations, and perseverance of far more NCOs who
are performing critical functions behind the scenes. The staff NCOs behind
the competitive events will improve day-to-day operations and hone their
organizations’ mission focus long after the best squads go home.
Army 2nd Lt. Michael Page (center), a platoon leader with 563rd Military
Police Company, 91st Military Police Battalion, attends a board at the
91st Military Police Battalion headquarters on Fort Drum, N.Y., March 7,
2023. This event was conducted as part of a best squad competition
designed to assess Soldiers on technical and tactical proficiency and
teamwork. (U.S. Army photo by Sgt. Kevin Dunnaway)
Notes
1. Eric Milzarski,
“This Is Why ‘Best Soldier’ Competitions Actually Matter for Junior
Enlisted,” We Are The Mighty, May 16, 2021,
https://www.wearethemighty.com/mighty-trending/best-soldier-competition-perks/
2. Department of the
Army, Training (ADP 7-0), (Department of the Army, 2024b), 2.
3. Department of the
Army, Military Police Operations (FM 3-39), (Department of the
Army, 2025a), 1.
4. Department of the
Army, The Noncommissioned Officer’s Guide (TC 7-22.7),
(Department of the Army, 2025b), 40.
5. NCO Worldwide,
“Battle Staff Noncommissioned Officer Course,” NCO Worldwide, accessed
2024,
https://www.ncoworldwide.army.mil/academics/battle-staff/
6. Department of the
Army, Planning and Orders Production (FM 5-0), (2024a), 1.
7. Darius Kirkwood,
“200th MP Soldier Runner-up at Best Warrior Competition,”
www.army.mil, August 9, 2009,
https://www.army.mil/article/25638/200th_mp_soldier_runner_up_at_best_warrior_competition
8. K. Perez, personal
communication, February 2024.
9. Brian Disque,
“Best-Warrior Competition: A Guide on How to Win,”
The NCO Journal, January 9, 2019,
https://www.armypress.army.mil/journals/nco-journal/archives/2019/january/best-warrior-competition/
10. Department of the
Army, Military Police Operations (FM 3-39), (Department of the
Army, 2025a), 104, 142.
11. Department of the
Army, Planning and Orders Production (FM 5-0), (2024a), 149.
12. Department of the
Army, The Noncommissioned Officer’s Guide (TC 7-22.7),
(Department of the Army, 2025b), 40.
13. Department of the
Army, Planning and Orders Production (FM 5-0), (2024a),
150–151.
14. Joint Chiefs of
Staff, Joint Planning (JP 5-0), (2024), VI-10.
15. Department of the
Army, Planning and Orders Production (FM 5-0), (2024a), 153.
16. Department of the
Army, Military Police Operations (FM 3-39), (Department of the
Army, 2025a), 83, 86.
17. Department of the
Army, Military Police Operations (FM 3-39), (Department of the
Army, 2025a), 9–10.
18. Department of the
Army, Planning and Orders Production (FM 5-0), (2024a), 126.
19. Arpi Dilanian and
Taiwo Akiwowo, 2016, “Is the Army Ready for Expeditionary Operations?”
Army Sustainment, May–June, 33,
https://alu.army.mil/alog/2016/mayjun16/pdf/16618.pdf
20. Department of the
Army, Military Police Operations (FM 3-39), (Department of the
Army, 2025a), 106.
21. Department of the
Army, ADP 1-0 The Army, edited by M. A. Milley and M. F.
Averill, Washington, DC: Department of the Army, 2019, 2–7.
22. Arpi Dilanian and
Taiwo Akiwowo, 2016, “Is the Army Ready for Expeditionary Operations?”
Army Sustainment, May–June, 33,
https://alu.army.mil/alog/2016/mayjun16/pdf/16618.pdf
23. Department of the
Army, Military Police Operations (FM 3-39), (Department of the
Army, 2025a), 83.
24. Randy George,
Gary Brito, and Michael Weimer, 2023, “Strengthening the Profession: A
Call to All Army Leaders to Refresh Our Professional Discourse,”
September 11, 2023,
https://mwi.westpoint.edu/strengthening-the-profession-a-call-to-all-army-leaders-to-revitalize-our-professional-discourse/
25. Department of the
Army, Training (ADP 7-0), (Department of the Army, 2024b), 3.
26. Department of the
Army, Military Police Operations (FM 3-39), (Department of the
Army, 2025a), 125, 132, 163.
27. Department of the
Army, The Noncommissioned Officer’s Guide (TC 7-22.7),
(Department of the Army, 2025b), 32.
28. J. Mazareigos,
personal communication, December 2024.
29. Joint Chiefs of
Staff, Joint Campaigns and Operations (JP 3-0), (2022), IV-47.
30. A. Ickes,
personal communication, March 2024.
31. Department of the
Army, Planning and Orders Production (FM 5-0), (2024a), 22.
32. Department of the
Army, Military Police Operations (FM 3-39), (Department of the
Army, 2025a), 93.
33. Joint Chiefs of
Staff, Joint Campaigns and Operations (JP 3-0), (2022), IV-1.
34. B. Grether,
personal communication, December 2024.
Authors
Master Sergeant Keith J. Kinnerson is currently a
student at the Sergeants Major Academy. His last assignment was as the
first sergeant of NCO Academy, Fort McCoy, Wisconsin with prior
positions in various military police and training units. He holds a
master’s degree in education from Malone University.
Sergeant First Class Brooke E. Grether is a combat
medic and operations NCO with the 139th Medical Brigade, Independence,
Missouri. She is also a registered nurse at University Health Truman
Metropolitan Community College, Penn Valley Medical Center in Kansas
City, Missouri. She holds an associate’s degree in applied science.
Sergeant First Class Justin A. Howard is a logistician
and recruiter in Kalamazoo, Michigan. He holds a bachelor’s degree in
general studies from Southern New Hampshire University and is pursuing a
master’s degree in business administration from the same institution.
Sergeant Major Zach Wriston is an assistant professor
in the Department of Joint, Interagency, Intergovernmental, and
Multinational Operations (DJIIMO) at the Sergeants Major Academy, Fort
Bliss, Texas. He holds master’s degrees in education from Pennsylvania
State University and public policy from Liberty University.
Master Sergeant Robert M. Bunch is the course manager
for Basic Leader Course, 168th Regiment (RTI), Fort Carson, Colorado.
During his 25-year career, he has served in a variety of military police
operations and leadership positions, deployed multiple times, and led
the 200th MPC BWC for four years. He holds a bachelor’s degree from
American Military University and is completing a master’s degree in
organizational leadership from Columbia Southern.