C2 Fix Officer Strength and Education Management
By CPT Cory Mullikin
Article published on:
October 25, 2024 in the Winter 2024-2025 edition of Infantry
Read Time:
< 7 mins
Soldiers from the 2nd Mobile Brigade Combat Team, 101st Airborne
Division (Air Assault) conduct vehicle preparations in anticipation for
the Large-Scale, Long-Range Air Assault as part of Operation Lethal
Eagle 24.1 on 21 April 2024, on Fort Campbell, KY. (Photo by SFC Joseph
Truesdale)
As the U.S. Army switches to the concept of large-scale combat operations
(LSCO), multiple areas are evolving and changing the way we look at
contested environments. Arguably the largest area that needs restructuring
is how the Army communicates at different echelons, namely with division
becoming the unit of action. This consists of reviewing manning and
equipment at division and below. The Army Structure (ARSTRUC) and Command
and Control (C2) Fix initiative have stated that the amount of signal
equipment, classification of material, and manning at echelon needs to
change to support survivability in a LSCO environment against a peer or
near-peer adversary. This article considers the manning of specialized
Signal military occupational specialty (MOS) positions in the brigade S-6
shop and assesses proposed changes that would move those positions from
the brigade to the division or a signal battalion. I will offer analysis
of the impact of these proposed moves and a recommendation to change the
training for specialty MOSs that will remain at the brigade level to help
fill capability gaps that will otherwise result from the changes.
In keeping with C2 Fix and ARSTRUC, much of the upper tactical internet we
are used to seeing at the brigade and battalion echelon will either be
moved to the division level for a signal battalion or phased out in
general. Equipment such as the Tactical Communication Node (TCN) and
Satellite Transportable Terminal (STT) are getting cut because they are
too large and inconsistent with the intent of getting lighter and faster
to increase survivability. With these assets going away in one way or
another, the need for personnel in the brigade S-6 shop will shift
greatly, particularly in the technical expert officers — the network
technician (255N), server technician (255A), cyber security technician
(255S), and data systems engineer (26B). Three of these four are being
slated to move to division or the signal battalion.
The cyber security technician has already been identified to move up to
division. These technicians are frequently underutilized in their specific
role at the brigade level because most firewall management and cyber
security policies are overseen by the division. Given that this MOS is are
also significantly below desired strength Army wide, it is not hard to
understand moving them to the division level.
Data system engineers have chiefly been used as the assistant brigade S-6,
supporting the S-6 OIC with planning and administrative dealings, but
typically getting minimal hands-on utilization with servers and other
equipment they have been trained to operate.
The fielding of Integrated Tactical Network (ITN) equipment expanded the
scope of equipment and responsibilities of the network technician (255N).
Since nearly every piece of signal equipment has an Internet Protocol (IP)
address (including radios), this has significantly expanded the scope of
responsibilities of the 255N.
Lastly, the server technician — when the brigade hosted its own services,
it made sense for the 26B and 255A to manage those pieces of equipment.
Now the division will host effectively all services, and the brigade may
have one or two Tactical Server Infrastructure (TSI) Small servers in its
formation to act as local compute and store devices to help alleviate
bandwidth needs on common operating picture services like the Command Post
Computing Environment (CPCE).
Senior Army Signal leaders, such as COL Michael Wacker and BG Paul Howard,
have expressed a preference of bringing the network technician and data
system engineer, along with the cyber security technician, to division
echelon or alternatively reassigning them to the signal battalion. This
would leave the S-6 officer-in-charge (OIC) — a major — and the server
technician as the only officers in the brigade S-6 section. The server
technician would then need to manage the admittedly limited server
presence at the brigade, while also remaining responsible for the larger
networking requirements that go along with ITN. However, the return of
signal battalions will alleviate a significant part of a 255A’s current
workload. This still puts server technicians at a stark disadvantage when
operating and troubleshooting with non-organic signal teams due to lack of
relevant training at their Warrant Officer Basic Course (WOBC).
For the reasons discussed above, it is recommended that if the U.S. Army
begins manning brigades this way, with only the OIC and server technician,
the training for 255As must be revisited. Network technicians and data
system engineers both receive six weeks of Cisco networking classes in
their training, but server technicians only receive the first two weeks of
this course. This puts 255As at a significant disadvantage without those
additional four weeks of training. They will still be competent with some
network and server knowledge, but providing the additional four weeks of
training will alleviate the steep learning curve if they come straight
from their WOBC to a brigade S-6 assignment.
The initiative to move the network technician, cyber security technician,
and data system engineer to the division and signal battalion is
ultimately the right move, albeit there will be some growing pains
associated with it. Utilizing their skill sets to enhance augmented teams
that will support brigades is the better move — due to operators and
technicians being able to focus almost exclusively on their job set and
not have the additional requirements found in a brigade combat team.
Keeping the server technician at the brigade level, at least for a first
assignment (especially if TSI Small servers will stay at that level) makes
sense, but they will need to have that additional network training to be
fully prepared for their first assignment.
Authors
CPT Cory Mullikin currently serves as the data systems
engineer for the 2nd Mobile Brigade Combat Team, 101st Airborne Division
(Air Assault), Fort Campbell, KY. He is a graduate of the Army’s
Information Systems Engineering Course at Fort Eisenhower, GA. CPT
Mullikin earned a master’s degree in business administration from the
University of Maryland Global Campus and a bachelor’s degree in biology
from the University of Memphis.