Applying Divergent Thinking to Improve Lethality and Retain Flexibility
By SSG Brandon Sutan
Article published on: June 1, 2024 in Field Artillery 2024 Issue 1
Read Time:
< 4 mins
Life in the military, especially
in the Field Artillery, is about being adaptable to the circumstances that define our mission, such as
spending
those late nights to ensure our
howitzers are fully mission capable, coordinating with other battalions to provide support if needed, or
getting
that emergency deployment readiness exercise (EDRE) to ensure that we are always ready at a moment’s notice.
Now
imagine trying to accomplish this. You lose a section chief or squad leader to an unpredictable circumstance
now
that section loses its firing capabilities until another leader has conducted the proper certification
tables.
Imagine if you had an additional certified section chief or squad leader within that section. You would no
longer have to struggle to fill the position and can maintain
firing capabilities and be prepared for those unexpected or expected events in the unpredictability of life.
Certifying two crews per
section might seem mundane and not worth the effort at first, but using divergent thinking or horizontal
thinking, you can create multiple solutions, such as what happens when that section chief has to attend
military
training or is Department of the Army (DA) selected for drill sergeant or recruiting duty, or gets injured
and a
medical evaluation board process gets initiated or decides that the Army is longer for them and begins the
transition process and now as a leader you are being reactive rather than proactive trying to find the
solution
and potentially requiring that a recently promoted sergeant takes the reigns knowing that they might not be
ready increasing the potential risk of a firing incident. This is a risk many command teams must take as our
organizations are ever-changing. The movement of personnel is continuous due to service members due to a
permanent change of station (PCS) or being moved to another position due to an unpredictable event.
Many positives correlate with
this method of approach as it allows organizational leaders to maintain firing capabilities due to personnel
and
ultimately allows leaders to instill the efforts of taking care of their service members and allowing them
to
take advantage of more opportunities to improve their professional development such as attending military
training such as schools or professional developmental courses without hindering the organization. It will
also
give commanders a sense of ease, creating an additional safety check regarding an additional certified
leader
operating that equipment. At the section level, it will instill a sense of camaraderie and healthy
competition
to succeed. It will also develop the mindset of being prepared for the unexpected. Each team member
will have at least two positions improving training results as they could move to a different job
immediately
and be adequately equipped with the increased emphasis on the following level-up drills. Both internal crews
will want to be better than the other regarding their artillery skills and proficiency while allowing them
to
collaborate to achieve the best possible results.
With this method over time, I
believe it would have a positive impact as we move forward as the King of Battle and will
increase
the proficiency of our leaders and future leaders when the time comes for the newly promoted leaders to take
control of their sections or as the section leaders progress through their careers they will gain a deeper
level
of understanding and an increased level of knowledge and experience regarding their artillery skills. It
will
create a systematic approach of leaders training future leaders and identifying better ways of conducting
tactical operations, as the best ideas come from trial and error or a different perspective.
Applying a divergent method
of thinking to consider the certifications of two crews per artillery section will allow leaders at all
levels
to benefit and be accountable.
Soldiers from the 75th Field
Artillery Brigade; the 2nd Battalion, 18th Field Artillery Regiment; and the 4th Battalion, 60th Air
Defense
Artillery Regiment load various military vehicles onto rails in preparation for an Emergency Deployment
Readiness Exercise (EDRE) at the National Training Center (NTC). (Photo by Edward Muñiz, Fort Sill
Public
Affairs Office)
In conclusion, applying a
divergent method of thinking to consider the certifications of two crews per artillery section will allow
leaders at all levels to benefit and be accountable. From the section level, it will increase that
progressive
competition and will increase training value as they will be required to learn multiple positions to perform
what is expected from them and will provide the experience to newly promoted leaders to ensure they are
competent and understand the scope of what is required of a section leader. From the aspect of a commander,
it
allows them to maintain firing capabilities during unexpected events, such as losing a key leader due to an
unforeseen circumstance. It encourages them to be more proactive versus reactive. While still being able to
have
the ability to take care of their service members and allow more
opportunities for their leaders to take advantage of professional developmental programs or PMEs without
creating an increased impact on the organization.
Author
SSG Brandon Sutan
currently serves as an M777A2 Howitzer Section chief in Bravo Battery, 2-12th Field Artillery
Regiment, 1st
Stryker Brigade Combat Team at Fort Carson, Colorado. He has consistently trained other howitzer
section chiefs
and played a vital role in assisting the 2-12th Field Artillery Regiments S3 function. SSG Sutan has
operation
experience in Operation Spartan Shield, Operation Eager Lion, and Operation Atlantic Resolve. He is
also a
full-time student at the University of Maryland Global Campus pursuing an undergraduate in Web &
Digital
Design with an expected graduation in December 2023.