The Bulldog Initiative
Next-Level Downed Aircraft Recovery Training
By CPT Christopher M. Vitols
Article published on:
March 10, 2026 in the Winter 2026 edition of the Aviation Digest
Read Time:
< 10 mins
A U.S. Army South Dakota National Guard flight medic rappels down from a
UH-60 Black Hawk during hoist training with 10th Special Forces Group
(Airborne) Green Berets on Fort Meade, South Dakota. U.S. Army photo by
SGT Rhianna Ballenger.
Introduction
As the Army’s primary maneuver asset in support of ground forces, Army
Aviation is undergoing a massive reformation and modernization to counter
near-peer adversaries. As threats develop, countertactics and gathered
intelligence increase, and two constants remain: Aircraft break, and the
enemy gets a vote. When responding to downed aircraft in austere and
hostile conditions, Downed Aircraft Recovery Teams (DARTs) repair the
aircraft to self-recover, conduct a deliberate recovery of the aircraft,
or in the worst scenario, destroy it and prevent enemy exploitation.
Company B, Aviation Support Company (ASC), 3D Combat Aviation Brigade (3
CAB), has embraced the recent push for doctrinal changes and pioneered the
movement for realistic and innovative DART training within 3 CAB. Through
actual aerial recovery training, recreating battle damage for repairs,
aircrew extraction drills, and aircraft destruction exercises, the Company
B Bulldogs are prepared to respond to any downed aircraft incident.
Company B/603D has developed a robust, adaptable train ing program
directly supporting Army modernization. Our approach—structured around the
aircraft maintenance P4T3 framework (Problem, Plan, People, Parts, Time,
Tools, Training)—offers a model for aviation maintenance and ASCs across
the force.
Opening Images. Downed Aircraft Recovery Team Exercises being
conducted by the Soldiers of B/603D Aviation Support Battalion (ASB), 3D
Combat Aviation Brigade (CAB), 3D Infantry Division at Hunter Army
Airfield (HAAF). U.S. Army photos by CPT Christopher Vitols and SSG Dean
Johnson, 3D CAB.
Problem: Training Limited by Imagination
In most CABs, DART training is limited and restricted to planning
exercises with maintainers, Soldiers filling out P4T3 sheets, and
connecting Unit Maintenance Aerial Recovery Kit (UMARK) ropes to a fully
mission-capable aircraft. In the forward leaning maintenance companies,
they also conduct convoy training, incorporating security, and
react-to-contact training objectives. These fundamentals are important to
expose junior maintainers to recovery concepts and serve as a baseline for
the organization; however, these efforts often stop short of fully
realistic recovery scenarios.
The problem herein lies:
How do you practice recovering a downed aircraft without a downed
aircraft? Regulations prohibit intentionally grounding aircraft, requiring creative
simulation. Solutions such as aligning major component replacement
training with inspections/ tasks on aircraft currently in phase (an
example being engine removal and reinstall) and conducting battle damage
assessment and repairs (BDAR) on scrap sheet metal exist. Tabletop and
planning exercises are also good to gain repetitions conducting troop
leading procedures. But how can we train for large-scale combat operations
(LSCO) further, replicating the complexity, friction, and lethality of the
modern battlefield?
Plan: Crawl, Walk, Run, Sprint
The B/603D mission-essential task (MET) list consists of three collective
tasks common to ASCs:
-
Conduct Aircraft Maintenance Support
-
Perform DART Missions
-
Conduct Expeditionary Deployment Operations
In late 2023, Perform DART Missions became B/603D’s priority MET. Our plan
was to incorporate a progressive crawl-walk-run model of training with
each phase, incorporating difficult military occupational specialty (MOS)
tasks, different methods of DART/BDAR, and greater mission complexity with
hybrid threats. The objectives of this series of exercises were:
-
Develop DART training scenario with battalion staff
-
Achieve 6-hour mobilization time, culminating with mission brief
-
Conduct tactical convoys with security elements
-
Validate UMARK operations with the sling-load of an actual victim
aircraft
-
Gain proficiency in BDAR with real airframe and component repairs
-
Train extraction and stabilization of simulated aircrew injury
-
Integrate with ground units for joint security or objective-based
training
-
Execute dynamic, hybrid DART missions under LSCO conditions
To achieve these training objectives, our annual training plan
incorporated a series of six brigade-level DART Exercises (DARTEX I-VI).
People: Training the Trainers and Staff Integration
The progression began with Leader’s Time Training (LTT). Noncommissioned
officers introduced the UMARK kit, BDAR kit, medical training, and convoy
operations. Every Soldier attended iterations of these LTTs with the
mentality that any maintainer could be integrated at a moment’s notice for
a DART response. We maintained this could approach with the subsequent
exercises, allowing all members of the company to gain repetition in
training to prepare everyone collectively.
After initial LTTs, Company B executed DARTEX I, which was a planning
exercise lasting a week with three DART responses tailored for each
airframe type. Engagement from the operations and intelligence sections
was crucial for scenario realism. Figure 1 shows the operations and
intelligence update briefs given to our DART. Combating Donovian forces
and tasked with providing a standby DART, the Bulldogs supported aerial
screens, air assaults, and air movements conducted during the exercise
window. This initial exercise focused on following the troop leading
procedures and coordinating with our battalion staff, setting the tone for
every subsequent exercise and real-world DART mission that followed.
Figure 1. Friendly/enemy situational template provided by 603D
S2 for battalion operations and intelligence brief for Operation
Virtuous Defender (DARTEX I). Products developed by 603D ASB, 3 CAB.
Parts: Creative Training Aids
Downed aircraft recovery team exercises DARTEX III and V used the UMARK on
actual airframe hulls, validating the kit and team through elevator drills
and traffic patterns. The first hull was an OH-58D Kiowa static display
refurbished by backshops personnel. Airframe maintainers built brackets,
locking bars, and riveted every panel shut, and powertrain maintainers
inspected the structural integrity of the rotor head to ensure it could
withstand the UMARK stress. Figure 2 (Left) shows the OH-58D UMARK with a
CH-47F in the training area at Hunter Army Airfield (HAAF), Savannah,
Georgia.
Figure 2. B/603D conducts UMARK Training on OH-58D training aid
(LEFT) and conducts real-world recovery of an Air Force HH-60G (RIGHT).
U.S. Army photos by CPT Christopher Vitols, 3 CAB.
The second hull was a CH-47F airframe provided by Summit Aviation from
Delaware. The airframe was stripped for parts to salvage and refurbish
components, and only the airframe remained. The CH hull required more
extensive preparation, but after verification, the UMARK CH work packages
validated the 13,000-pound training load (Opening image, Left). Ingenuity
and utilizing networks created these training aids, but more importantly,
just starting a simple dialogue with Project Manager-Cargo sparked the
process to procure them.
Time: Making Start Point (SP) Time and the Golden Hour
The incorporation of tactical convoys in DARTEX II, III, and IV, revealed
a weakness in our DART responses. Using Light Medium Tactical Vehicles and
up-armored High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicles with mounted M2s
and MK19 systems, we focused on the fundamentals of timeline management,
sectors of fire, and interserial communi cation (Figure 3, Right).
We found that we were inefficiently and incorrectly conducting precombat
checks and inspections (PCC/PCIs) while preparing for the DART convoys,
thus consistently missing our SP times. Issues with filling radios for
secure communications, delays when mounting weapons, and equipment
serviceability plagued DARTEX II but highlighted key takeaways and lessons
learned for future operations. Exercise IV incorporated a night convoy
using night vision optics and opposing forces, and the team managed its
timeline correctly, maintained secure communications throughout, and
reacted appropriately to enemy contact.
In addition to the tactical convoys, the white cell for these exercises
incorporated Army Warrior Tasks, such as providing security on the
objective, moving under fire, and evaluating casualties. Using feedback
from medical evacuation (MEDEVAC) crew evaluators, the teams called in
9-line reports to extract personnel from the objective (Figure 3, Left).
When MEDEVAC support was unavailable, we initiated casualty evacuation and
exercised ambulance exchange points (AXPs) to transfer patients to a
higher role of care. Reinforcing fundamentals from PCC/PCIs to requesting
MEDEVAC is important when crafting a holistic DART training plan.
Figure 3. Medical evacuation (MEDEVAC) training on objective
egret (LEFT); Convoy training conducted during DARTEX II (RIGHT). U.S.
Army photos by CPT Christopher Vitols, 3 CAB.
Tools: Jaws of Life and BDAR Repairs
Colloquially known as the “Jaws of Life,” the Bulldogs maintain the aptly
named rescue system. Not organically assigned to an ASC and intended for
emergency services, the system is designed for the extraction of personnel
from wreck age. Continuing the push for innovative training, the DARTEX IV
scenario consisted of three aircraft that hard landed in the pickup zone
after encountering enemy fire. The first, a single UH-60M, suffered
stabilator failure and damage to a tail rotor drive shaft, while damage to
the two successive aircraft proved catastrophic and unrecoverable. The
Quick Response Force secured the site, and the DART deemed the first
aircraft recover able with BDAR and component replacement, while
surviving, but trapped, aircrew members were identified in the other
aircraft.
Figure 4. B/603D conducts aircrew extraction operations under
instruction from HAAF Emergency Services. U.S. Army photo by CPT
Christopher Vitols, 3 CAB.
Simulating the aircraft was a battered UH-1 airframe training aid and
salvaged cars donated by a scrap yard in Savannah, Georgia. The HAAF Fire
Department provided life-sized mannequins, “Rescue Randys,” to simulate
trapped aircrew members. After dispatching the team via convoy, extraction
of personnel was successful, and maintainers stabilized and transported
aircrew to the nearest AXP. Figure 4 shows HAAF Emergency Services
assisting Soldiers in the proper and most effective use of the tools prior
to the DARTEX.
The opening image (Right) depicts DART personnel using the rescue saw to
remove panels and recover simulated injured personnel. Bulldog Soldiers
completed BDAR and prepared the aircraft for a notional flight back to
friendly forces.
Training: Training How to Blow in Place (BIP)
What happens if an aircraft containing sensitive components and
information must land near or beyond the forward line of own troops and,
for various reasons, is unrecoverable? To deny enemy exploitation,
destruction of the wreckage with indirect fire, precision munitions, or
using placed charges may be a sound tactical decision. Stepping into the
final phase, the Bulldogs completed their DART progression with DARTEX VI,
a BIP (demolition) exercise.
Working with the 541st Sapper Company from Fort Stewart, Georgia, the
Bulldogs conducted a BIP demolition range using salvaged cars to simulate
aircraft. The engineers taught the maintainers to construct satchel
charges, electromagnetic warheads, shaped charges, and how to place and
detonate them safely. Then, maintenance test pilots instructed both
engineers and maintainers on priority aircraft components and systems to
sabotage. Figure 5 displays the destructive power and effectiveness of the
charges. This exercise completed the Bulldogs’ DART progression, resulting
in teams trained to repair, recover, and destroy aircraft in contested
environments.
Figure 5. Blow in Place operations on simulated aircraft
(DARTEX VI). U.S. Army photo by CPT Christopher Vitols, 3 CAB.
Conclusion
Aircraft break, and the enemy gets a vote. In LSCO, maintainers will not
only repair aircraft, they will also fight, secure objectives, extract
casualties, and make critical decisions under fire. In this environment,
joint operations with differing security elements will be requested, but
maintainers will need to understand basic Soldier tasks as casualties
accumulate. Aircraft and aircrew will fly in support of the ground force
but may need recovery assets when engaging with the enemy. Knowing this,
maintainers must understand that their impact is greater than just turning
a wrench during a phase. Thus, proficiency in MOS tasks and an “out of the
box” mentality amongst leaders is crucial for future conflicts.
The lessons learned from these DART-EXs instilled confidence and
experience that proved invaluable during a real-world incident. Amid the
training progression, an Air Force HH-60G executed an emergency landing in
Okeechobee, Florida, after sustaining damage to its blades and an engine.
Using the UMARK and CH-47F heavy-lift support, the Bulldog team
successfully evacuated the aircraft to a maintenance facility 30 miles
away (Figure 2, Right). As the first recovery mission executed by the
Bulldogs in recent years, it demonstrated the value of the DARTEX series
and fostered critical inter-service cooperation, which is a vital skill
for the next fight.
In summary, it is the commander's onus to advance their DART programs in
parallel with the Army’s modernization initiative. The DART mission is
already complex, making the emphasis on next-level training vital;
creative training produces innovative responses to challenges in the
operational environment. Ground forces place their trust in aviation
assets; therefore, aircrews and commanders must have the same confidence
in their maintenance and recovery support. This level of DART readiness
serves as a critical insurance policy for every mission and is fundamental
to sustaining combat power and upholding the unwavering promise to leave
no one behind.
Bulldogs! No Mission Denied! Marne Air!
Authors
CPT Christopher Vitols is a CH-47F Aviator and served
as the Platoon Leader for 603D ASC’s Airframe Repair Platoon from
2024-2025. His previous deployments include multiple rotations in
support of Operation Atlantic Resolve (U.S. European Command) and Korea
(U.S. Forces Korea).