From Regulation to Reality
Modernizing Army Sustainment Policy to Move with the Mission, Not Against
It
By CW5 Gregory B. Besaw
Article published on:
January 1, 2026 in the Winer 2026 of Army Sustainment
Read Time:
< 8 mins
Today’s Army must be fast and flexible. Modern warfare and operational
demands of large-scale combat operations (LSCO) have outpaced Cold War-era
logistics frameworks, and the Army’s ability to sustain the fight now
hinges as much on policy and doctrine as on weapon systems and information
technology platforms. For too long, we have been using rules written for a
different kind of Army, and now, in today’s landscapes, they are slowing
us down.
To bridge the gap between regulation and reality, Army policy must shift
from rigid mandates to an agile, outcome-based framework that empowers
commanders and Soldiers at the tactical edge, enabling fast mission
decisions and execution while maintaining compliance and accountability.
The Problem: Too Much Red Tape
Many of today’s logistics policies still focus on making sure every form
is filled out perfectly and every detail is correct. Since today’s LSCO
and digital battlefields are fast moving, these strict policy rules can
force commanders to choose between doing things by the book versus getting
the job done. In the most critical moments, including responding to a
near-peer engagement in Indo-Pacific Command or resupplying border
operations under contested logistics conditions, legacy policies can cause
dangerous delays and decision paralysis.
The Army recognizes that its regulations do not support Soldiers’ reality.
Commanders on the ground should not be forced to choose between mission
success and policy compliance. Yet, that is exactly what many commanders
frequently face.
For too long, we have been using rules written for a different kind of Army, and now, in today’s landscapes, they are slowing us down.
The Solution: Focus on Mission Reality, Not Regulation Mandates
To ease that burden, the Army is shifting to a new way of thinking.
Instead of telling commanders exactly how to do something, leaders are
telling them what must be accomplished and letting commanders figure out
the best way to do it. This outcome-based approach gives commanders more
freedom to quickly adapt to changing situations.
The Army’s Enterprise Business Systems–Convergence (EBS-C) program is
leading this change in thinking. EBS-C works to modernize Army logistics
and finance systems, including improving processes and policies, making
Army operations simpler and more efficient, closer to how retail suppliers
like Walmart and Amazon operate.
With input from EBS-C, the Army has already taken steps to align policy
with today’s mission set. The following are among the most significant are
revisions to several key Army regulations (ARs):
-
AR 710-4, Property Accountability: Less paperwork and
more use of digital systems like accountable property systems of record
to track equipment. Even more simplifications are planned for 2026.
-
AR 735-5, Relief of Responsibility and Accountability:
New digital tools, such as electronic financial liability investigation
of property loss (eFLIPL) make it easier and faster to report and
resolve lost items. Enhancements to eFLIPL this year added the inquiry
adjustment loss process for minor losses when negligence or misconduct
is not involved, and more enhancements are in development for the
future.
-
AR 710-2, Secondary Item Policy and Retail Level Management, and
Department of the Army Pamphlet 710-2-2, Supply Support Activity
Supply System:
Secondary Item and Retail Level Procedures: Using handheld devices and
digital records at supply support activities to improve accuracy and
efficiency.
-
AR 700-84, Issue and Sale of Personal Clothing:
Updates to coincide with the rollout of the Soldier Equipping and Asset
Management system for managing clothing and equipment.
These changes have one thing in common: they create a more flexible
environment for Soldiers to achieve mission success without compromising
compliance.
Working Together to Improve Policy
The Army is also changing how it creates policies. EBS-C works directly
with Soldiers, commanders, and users to understand their needs and
challenges. This co-creation process ensures that policies are practical
and useful. We listen to the people who use these rules and make changes
based on their feedback. Agile teams spot gaps between old rules and new
needs and share those insights to help update Army policies. This teamwork
allows for faster improvements, better field-informed decisions, and
policies that support readiness while still following the rules.
It is also important to note the impact these changes are having outside
EBS-C and the sustainment community to support broader Army and War
Department (DOW) priorities. For example, EBS-C, with input from its
Soldier and user base, was part of a team that worked to reduce overly
detailed regulatory constraints to allow off-the-shelf software
acquisition rather than needing costly customization to meet Army needs.
This aligns with Presidential Executive Order 14265, Modernizing Defense
Acquisitions and Spurring Innovation in the Defense Industrial Base, which
mandates modernization in federal procurement. It also supports readiness
at the strategic level, whether in ammunition resupply, Organic Industrial
Base operations, or supporting the defense industrial base.
Challenges Ahead
Even with these improvements, there is still work to be done. We know that
adopting new processes takes time. Right now, inspectors sometimes still
request hard copies of documents from field units, even when digital
outputs are available. However, EBS-C, along with Headquarters, Department
of the Army G-4, is working to fast-track the acceptance of these new
initiatives by ensuring that staff across the enterprise are aware of and
using these automated workflows where available. The team also hopes to
soon use DOW-approved collaboration tools (like Wikis) and artificial
intelligence to rapidly reconcile doctrine, policy, and systems
documentation to keep policies up-to-date and easy to understand.
The Bottom Line: The Army Needs Policy That Moves with the Mission, Not
Against It Ultimately, EBS-C’s goal is to create sustainment policies that
do the following:
-
Focus on the why and what, not just the how.
-
Provide commanders with the flexibility to quickly adapt to changing
situations.
-
Use common standards to ensure everyone can seamlessly work together.
-
Are easy to update as technology and missions evolve.
-
Are based on inputs from the field.
Sustainment is not just about moving supplies — it is about giving
Soldiers a strategic advantage in every environment. EBS-C and Army
leaders are working to modernize policies so they support both regulation
and reality in the field, without sacrificing the success of one for the
other. If a policy is not executable at the tactical edge, then it is not
fit for the future fight. The ability to move, adapt, and supply in real
time depends on having policies that move with the mission, not against
it.
Author
CW5 Gregory W. Besaw serves as the Soldier advocate for
the Enterprise Business Systems–Convergence Multifunctional Capabilities
Team, detailed from Headquarters, Department of the Army G-4. He is a
strategic policy and procedures author with extensive experience in
property accountability and sustainment operations. He holds a master’s
degree in logistics management from the Florida Institute of Technology
and is a certified Demonstrated Master Logistician.