Supply Team Certifications

Sustainment Tables for Supply Certifications

By Maj. Mikhail Jackson

Article published on: June 20, 2024

Read Time: < 4 min

Sustainment requires simultaneous and continuous synchronization at all echelons of command. The sustainment warfighting function can be both complex and complicated when not handled appropriately. Sustainment warfighting requires a holistic and balanced viewpoint at all echelons for a unit to be successful. Looking at sustainment throughout the years, specifically property accountability, there are multiple challenges and a lack of synchronization at the company supply level. Company supply rooms must have trained supply personnel who stay nested with each other on day-to-day responsibilities to be successful. Supply teams must understand and share a balance of roles and responsibilities. To better set conditions for success, units need to invest time in developing company supply teams with the appropriate training and certification/qualification. Sustainment team certification establishes a common language and understanding of standards, allowing commands to understand the risk they are assuming in their supply rooms.

Supply Team Certification

A company supply team typically consists of a company commander, supply sergeant, supply clerk, and executive officer/supply officer. Given that the Army is commander-centric, and that the Command Supply Discipline Program is a commander’s program, a commander must stay involved with daily supply transactions to enforce appropriate supply measures. The commander and his small team of Soldiers can be fully functional if all Soldiers get the appropriate training and know their roles and responsibilities.

Considering that the workload of a supply team can sometimes be overwhelming, each supply representative must be diligently involved with their day-to-day supply contributions consistently. A supply team certification model similar to the Integrated Weapons Training Strategy (IWTS) certification concept could be extremely beneficial to company supply teams. IWTS tables build relationships, increase maneuver understanding of how to provide sound guidance, and improve understanding of the capabilities and limitations of maneuver unit systems. Training Circular 3-20.0, Integrated Weapons Training Strategy (IWTS), states,“Fundamental Soldier and military occupational specialty specific skills serve as the foundation of IWTS and must not be overlooked. Soldiers,crews, teams, squads, platoons, companies, and battalions achievethe highest level of proficiency when building upon mastery ofthose foundational skills.” A similar supply team certification concept like that of IWTS would help synchronize needed training for supply teams and provide a shared experience for Soldiers to be better involved as sustainment leaders.

Though some might think the notion of supply team certification is a bit unconventional, it is not too farfetched to lean toward the unusual process of table certification for supply teams, especially given that supply teams will have more supply transactions in future modernization efforts, such as StoreFront, changing the way sustainment does business. Supply team certification would further prepare supply teams for success by giving them the experience they would need for future supply transactions.

So, what does a supply team certification table look like? My theory is it would incorporate all the essential elements of supply. A supply team would need to understand the basic knowledge of sustainment within their unit to be successful. This concept would include the knowledge, training, and understanding of cyclic inventories, change-of-command inventories, lateral transfers, the Total Equipment Management Strategy, and maintenance operations. I recommend a two-week (81.5-hour) certification block consisting of supply course sustainment tables where supply teams would go to get trained and certified.

Supply Team Certification Training and Resourcing

Supply team certification is not a bridge too far, given that the Army had a similar proficiency program concept in the late 1970s called the Skill Qualification Test. It might not be too hard to even fathom a similar proficiency military occupational specialty (MOS) testing concept

Suggested classes for supply team certification. (Table by Maj. Mikhail Jackson)

extending to all the other MOSs across the Army. Professional military education (PME) is not something that should be taken lightly, especially if we intend to have leaders lead effectively at the speed of war. Though resourcing may have hurt previous program concepts, resourcing for supply certification training would come from the battalions (BNs) to the companies with assistance from command maintenance evaluation and training (COMET) team reps. COMET team reps would conduct training and BN S-4s would do the final certification after training were completed, with hands-on vignette testing consisting of supply reports, financial liability investigations of property loss, the Army Records Information Management System, and normal supply transactions for the certification test. A more internalized resource concept might prove to be a move in the right direction.

Final Thoughts and Considerations

By focusing on synchronization, we can change the cultural misunderstandings at the company supply level. Synchronization at all echelons is critical when understanding required training. I recommend that company supply teams receive training when they arrive at their unit and be certified immediately following their arrival with supply team certifications. If a Soldier fails certification, they retrain; if they fail again, they may need to be reclassed or flagged. Also, given the frequency of personnel changes, supply teams would need recertification annually.

The consistency of required training on a routine basis ensures the supply synchronization needed for unit sustainment success. Furthermore, it is time to ask the hard question: If Soldiers cannot demonstrate proficiency in their MOS, especially with something as extremely technical as sustainment, do Soldiers need more self-development, or does the Army need a stronger stance on PME certifications?