Pivotal Perspective: In Defense of the Formation
How Engaging with Your Unit Increases Lethality
By Captain Sarah Tate Chambers
Article published on: May 1, 2026 in the 2026 Issue 1 of Army Lawyer
Read Time: < 4 mins
U.S. Army Soldiers begin their day with an early morning formation at Fort Eustis, VA. (Credit: SSG Jeremy Hines)
We stumbled towards the field, eyes often matted, some of us sweaty from the commute in or the workout we just finished. Then, we lined up in ranks on a field—often audibly grumbling about what a pain it was. We are all familiar with this unifying experience of military service: the formation. While some may believe it has little place or purpose in today’s Army, would abandoning it be truly Soldier-care-centered?
Over the course of weeks and months, the small, casual interactions I had during formation fostered deep bonds. To this day, some of these friendships carry me through change, challenge, and everything in between.1 Beyond the personal level, these informal bonds also reinforce collective resilience and readiness, which are especially relevant in high-stress or combat situations. While formations may seem archaic, they still play a crucial role in building resilience, unit cohesion, and, ultimately, lethality.
Beyond the Office: Why Formation Matters for 27-Series Soldiers
Formations are one of the only organized, daily opportunities for 27-series Soldiers to get away from our computer and out of the office. Sometimes, we need a forcing function to pull ourselves away from our ever-growing to-do lists. Being siloed is not only a detriment to ourselves and the Corps; it is also a detriment to the unit. It will not be optional during the next near-peer conflict.2 We must be prepared to be the only 27-series in the room and work seamlessly as a member of the collective team. We also need to be prepared to not have the technical support chain network that we rely on in garrison.3 Formations are an exercise for us to develop those muscles and build those bridges. Showing up to formation and engaging with teammates outside the legal office builds our capacity to lead and serve, and in doing so, we are truly caring for the Soldiers with whom we will go into battle.
The Mundane Is Not Minor
How, then, do we show up at formation? The seemingly trivial interactions that formation affords serve as preparatory exercises for communication, camaraderie, and, ultimately, combat readiness. In other words, chatting and yapping4 are important aspects of building unit cohesion.
At the risk of sergeants major rolling their eyes, chatting and yapping offer significant social and community benefits by fostering a sense of belonging and promoting emotional support. Informal conversations help individuals maintain and strengthen social bonds, which are crucial for a healthy sense of community.5 Regular social interactions, even in casual settings, have been shown to enhance trust and reciprocity among individuals.6 Casual conversations build “bridging” and “bonding” ties that connect individuals across diverse social groups and reinforce shared norms and trust within communities.7
Moreover, casual chatting provides an avenue for emotional support, which is essential in promoting mental well-being within communities.8 Studies have shown that individuals who engage in regular informal conversations experience lower levels of stress and higher levels of social satisfaction, which, in turn, strengthen communal ties and mutual support networks.9 This sense of support through community interchange is especially important in times of crisis or social instability because it helps to foster resilience and collective problem-solving.10 The first time we are practicing chatting and yapping among the ranks does not need to be while we are confronting our near-peer enemy. If we casually engage other sections—despite our initial discomfort—we prepare ourselves for the next fight as much as the following physical training (PT) does.
Formation provides something increasingly rare in a busy operational environment: a predictable, shared space where Soliders from across sections simply stand together and interact. That small moment of proximity matters.
Changing Unit Dynamics and Performance
The impact of casual conversations reaches past the individual level and shapes the very culture of a unit. Stupid jokes and gentle questions can shift the atmosphere by building a sense of belonging and care that resonates throughout the team. When Soldiers feel genuinely supported by their peers and leadership, it cultivates a culture where resilience, trust, and motivation thrive.11 Research underscores that Soldiers who experience strong social support are not only more resilient and less stressed but also more committed to their roles, elevating the unit’s overall performance.12 Positive interactions encourage flexible, creative, and adaptive mindsets, which lead to increased resilience.13
In a unit culture rooted in trust and belonging, people are more likely to engage fully, commit to group goals, and support each other.14 This foundation of cohesion and shared purpose transforms a unit from a collection of individuals into a unified, high-performing team.
Formation is not—and should not be—the only time these casual conversations occur. Strong units build connection in may places: on the obstacle course, over coffee before the duty day begins, and in the brief moments between tasks. But, formation provides something increasingly rare in a busy operational environment: a predictable, shared space where Soliders from across sections simply stand together and interact. That small moment of proximity matters. It creates a routine opportunity for the causual conversations that build familiarity, trust, and, ultimately, the cohesion upon which combat effectiveness depends.
Beyond Theory: Formations as a Frontline in Showing Up for Others
Beyond everyday exchanges and unit-level performance, formation provides the opportunity to observe and understand your peers on a deeper level. For instance, imagine a Soldier who normally jokes and smiles during formation. One morning, he shows up looking distracted and withdrawn. Over time, being in formation with this group has allowed you to notice this shift in his usual demeanor. This small observation could prompt you to check in with him: offering support or encouraging him to seek help if needed. It is true that he is not likely to be your Soldier in this situation. But, the only Army I want to be in is one where we all belong to one another and actively care for each other. Do not underestimate the power of a kind word or simple smile. Without closing our eyes, most of us can recall the difference another Soldier made for us when we were at a low point. In these moments, the purpose of formation goes beyond accountability to fostering an environment where we look out for each other’s well-being and ensure no one struggles in isolation.
Formations, despite criticisms, embody the Army value of loyalty and play an important role in generating a supportive, adaptive force ready for challenge. So much is made of the Army’s community, and even something as simple as gathering for formation reinforces that bond.15 But formation goes beyond community-building; each one is a chance for us to shape the culture of our unit and set the tone for resilience and camaraderie. Every time we show up, we have the opportunity to be the leader and Soldier we want to be, and to influence and strengthen this institution to which we all belong. I cannot wait to stand next to you and hear all your bad jokes. I need them. I bet the Soldier on the other side of you does as well. TAL
Notes
1. Admittedly, a Reservist advocating for formations after serving two Active Duty Operational Support (ADOS) tours, only one of which utilized formations, may draw the same denouncement that Henry David Thoreau receives for writing on solitude after spending only two years on Walden Pond. See, e.g., Kathryn Schulz, Pond Scum: The Moral Judgments of Henry David Thoreau, New Yorker (Oct. 19, 2015), https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/10/19/pond-scum [https://perma.cc/LV8S-U2TT] . I readily acknowledge the burden formations place on families and Soliders. However, formations need not occur before physical training (PT) or at the start of the duty day. Historically (and presently, if one is attending CONUS Replacement Center (CRC) at Fort Bliss), formations occurred throughout the duty day. Thankfully, the Army grants commanders discretion in when and where to hold formations in order to serve the unit’s and Soldiers’ needs. This is an excellent opportunity for commanders to exercise creativity in determining the best time for formation.
2. Brigadier General R. Patrick Huston, The Future JAG Corps, Army Law., no. 1, 2019, at 2, 2 (“In future combat with a peer competitor we will likely face degraded communications, making our ability to advise the warfighter uniquely challenging.”); Lieutenant General Charles Pede & Colonel Peter Hayden, The Eighteenth Gap: Preserving the Commander’s Legal Maneuver Space on “Battlefield Next,” Mil. Rev., May-June 2018, at 6, 8 (“Shifting to a full-up fight against the declared hostile forces of a near-peer adversary is an entirely different kettle of fish. . . . Such warfighting will look very different from the operations of the last twenty years.”); Colonel Andrew M. McKee & Lieutenant Colonel Jason M. Elbert, Embrace the Crucible Exercise: An Intentional Approach to Training Opportunities, Army Law., no. 2, 2022, at 9, 10 (2022) (“JAG Corps doctrine requires readiness to provide legal support ‘in austere conditions, to rapidly maneuvering and mobile unit headquarters, in a contested digital environment.’ In order to provide principled counsel . . . JAs must have [law of armed conflict] fluency and challenge their understanding in realistic environments.”).
3. U.S. Dep’t of Army, Field Manual 3-84, Legal Support to Operations 3-43 (1 Sep. 2023).
4. While “yapping” used to hold a primarily negative connotation, Gen Z social media creators have redefined the term to refer generally to talking a lot and enthusiastically about “unimportant things.” Jenna Jean Davis & Elaine Heredia, What Does “Yapping” Mean? (And Why Is It Popular Now?), wikiHow (Apr. 18, 2025), https://www.wikihow.com/Yapping-Meaning [https://perma.cc/W8BC-6ZS7].
5. See Justine Coupland, Small Talk: Social Functions, 36 Res. Lang. & Soc. Interaction 1 (2003); Sean Lauer, Karen Lok Yi Wong & Miu Chung Yan, Social Infrastructure, Community Organizations, and Friendship Formation: A Scoping Review, 60 Community Dev. J. 267 (2025).
6. See Robert D. Putnam, Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community 19–21 (2000).
7. See id. at 22–25; see also Thomas A. Kolditz, Leonard Wong, Raymond A. Millen, & Terrence M. Potter, Why They Fight: Combat Motivation in the Iraq War (2003) (arguing that unit cohesion—the bonds between soldiers—remains as one of the primary purposes for why soldiers choose to fight).
8. See Charles E. Drebing, Edward J. Federman & James Graham, Casual Social Contacts: A Qualitative Study of the Experience and Reaction, Cureus, eCollection, no. e79413 (Feb. 21, 2025); Sheldon Cohen & Thomas A. Wills, Stress, Social Support, and the Buffering Hypothesis, 98 Psych. Bull. 310 (1985).
9. See Barbara L. Fredrickson et al., Open Hearts Build Lives: Positive Emotions, Induced Through Loving-Kindness Meditation, Build Consequential Personal Resources, 95 J. Pers. & Soc. Psych. 1045, 1050 (2008).
10. See Bechir Mokline & Mohamed Anis Ben Abdallah, The Mechanisms of Collective Resilience in a Crisis Context: The Case of the ‘COVID-19’ Crisis, 23 Glob. J. Flexible Sys. Mgmt. 151 (2022).
11. See Benjamin Schneider, Mark G. Ehrhart & William H. Macey, Organizational Climate and Culture, 64 Ann. Rev. Psych. 361, 364–66 (2013).
12. Id.; See R. Eisenberger et al., Perceived Organizational Support and Employee Diligence, Commitment, and Innovation, 75 J. Applied Psych. 51, 53–54 (1990).
13. See Barbara L. Fredrickson, The Role of Positive Emotions in Positive Psychology: The Broaden-and-Build Theory of Positive Emotions, 56 Am. Psych. 218, 220 (2001).
14. See S.L. Blader, S. Patil, & D.J. Packer, Organizational Identification and Workplace Behavior: More than Meets the Eye, 37 Rsch. Org. Behav. 19 (2017).
15. See Emile Durkheim, The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life 46–50 (Karen E. Fields trans., Free Press 1995) (1912) (arguing that regular group gatherings, even for routine or symbolic purposes, reinforce social bonds and shared identity); see also Putnam, supra note 6, at 21–23 (discussing how communal activities, no matter how trivial, help maintain community cohesion and trust).
Authors
CPT Chambers is a Reservist Appellate Attorney at the Defense Appellate Division at Fort Belvoir, Virgina. In her civilian capacity, she is a National Security Attorney for the Federal Government and a student in Brown University’s Sc.M. in Cybersecurity program.