Court Is Assembled
Mastering Multinational Integration with a Winning Mindset
By Colonel Andrew M. McKee
Article published on: January 1, 2025 in The Army Lawyer
Issue 1
Read Time:
< 8 mins
MAJ Amanda Dixson (standing, second-from-left), legal exchange officer with
3rd (UK) Division, stands with members of the 3rd (UK) Division legal team,
including Lieutenant Colonel (UK) Andy Farquhar (kneeling, right), former
deputy director of the Legal Center, The Judge Advocate General’s Legal
Center and School, in Charlottesville, VA. (Photo courtesy of author)
The Judge Advocate General’s (JAG) Corps mission statement requires Judge
Advocate Legal Services (JALS) personnel to operate “in support of a ready,
globally responsive, and regionally engaged Army.”1
The JAG Corps unsurprisingly achieves this part of its mission by stationing
and rotating forces worldwide. By extension, the JAG Corps’s support to
commanders at echelon will bring JALS personnel into contact with allies and
unified action partners across all strategic contexts: competition, crisis,
and armed conflict.2
As members of our Corps around the world, these personnel are engaged in or
supporting multinational operations and developing legal
interoperability.3
Army interoperability doctrine acknowledges that the Army will have limited
time to integrate with allies and partners, which means now is the time to
develop interoperability to adequately prepare for conflict.4
However, the Army’s approach to interoperability is quite broad, and it
entails an overwhelming amount of information to master.5
One personal experience drove this breadth of the Army’s broad
interoperability mandate home for me. The moment was memorable because it
was exceptionally humbling.
There we were, having just completed Warfighter Exercise 21-4 in April 2021.
As the 1st Armored Division (1AD) staff judge advocate, I felt very proud of
how the division staff and the national security law team performed during
the exercise. The exercise was a major multinational warfighter with 1AD
fighting as the U.S. division alongside the 3rd United Kingdom Division and
3rd French Division as part of a coalition that III Corps (U.S.) led. The
exercise design placed us along the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s
(NATO) eastern flank in opposition to a near-peer adversary. The exercise
culminated in a ten-month training cycle and reflected a significant
investment in our time, resources, and energy.
During the after-action review (AAR), our division continued to take a hard
look at itself, reflecting an organization at the peak of its warfighting
abilities but still willing to seek opportunities to improve. As the AAR
wound down, the division command sergeant major interjected with a comment
along these lines: “We talk about these problems as if they are new, but did
anyone here read any NATO STANAGs to prepare for this exercise? NATO has
been solving these problems for years and already has doctrine for almost
all of the issues we have been discussing.”6
In full confession, I had not read any NATO STANAGs up to that point, likely
because I had not even heard of them, despite having recently been stationed
in Europe. I rushed out of the AAR to search “STANAG” online and learned
that a “STANAG” is a NATO standardization agreement.
CPT Megan Holt (right), U.S. Army Europe and Africa national security law
attorney, while on an observer mission to the United Kingdom for a
multinational exercise. (Photo courtesy of author)
My assignments since that experience have afforded me opportunities to learn
more about NATO, NATO STANAGs, and the vast breadth of knowledge already
developed among our NATO allies. Each new experience and each new lesson
serve as reminders that we do not know what we do not know. Being aware of
our own ignorance can present a barrier that can impede taking the risk of
an assignment in unfamiliar locations. Moreover, current political tensions
in the world increase the risk that our ignorance could come at a cost.
Despite the enormity of the risk and the significant amount of new
information to master, how can our JALS personnel, especially, but not
exclusively, young judge advocates (JAs) and paralegals who have yet to gain
extensive repetitions and experience, prepare themselves to operate
worldwide as part of a multinational team? What can inspire a young JA or
paralegal to leap into developing legal interoperability when achieving a
mastery of the law challenges even seasoned JAs?
Any of our legal professionals can succeed in an overseas assignment with
the right mindset. The task is massive, but not insurmountable. Success is
rewarding, bringing new friendships, a deeper understanding of other
cultures and approaches (and likely a deeper understanding of your own
culture and approaches), and the satisfaction of accomplishing a difficult
task. The best part is that each JA and paralegal has complete agency over
their mindset, making success in this area imminently achievable by every
single member of the JALS team. Below, I offer three traits that members of
our Corps can adopt to successfully approach multinational integration.
Openness
The first component of a winning mindset for multinational integration is
being open to the experience. Every trip to a foreign country is an
opportunity to travel—both to a new location and to a place outside of one’s
comfort zone. These opportunities that the JAG Corps offers its members to
engage in the most consequential practice on earth—in locations all over the
earth—are unique and often once-in-a-career experiences. Every engagement
with a multinational partner is also an opportunity to travel outside one’s
comfort zone. These opportunities can be disorienting, especially at the
outset. It is understandable and expected to feel timid while adjusting to a
culture shock and hesitant to misstep or risk unintended offense. However,
if you embrace the initial discomfort, you will adapt to respond with more
certainty and less discomfort over time.
Humility
The second component of a winning mindset for multinational integration is
humility. Multinational integration involves forming relationships.
Having gotten comfortable with the idea of being uncomfortable, approaching
new experiences with a humble attitude is critical to helping form those
relationships necessary for success.7
Approaching the multinational environment with a full awareness of one’s
knowledge gaps and a willingness to learn from others regardless of
expertise in other legal domains will prevent alienating allies and
contribute to building comfort and trust.
Army Doctrine Publication 6-22 states, “A leader with the right level of
humility is a willing learner, maintains accurate self-awareness, and seeks
out others’ input and feedback.”8
A JALS professional in a multinational setting is expected to contribute an
appropriate level of expertise in U.S. law and the customs, courtesies, and
procedures of the U.S. Army. However, those personnel lack the same level of
expertise in host-nation law, customs, courtesies, procedures, history, and
culture. Exercising humility will help cultivate a healthy self-awareness of
these completely understandable deficiencies and drive the humble leader to
seek resources to learn more about one’s teammates. Humble leaders ask
questions—asking questions with a genuine interest and respect for your
international partners’ customs, personalities, capabilities, ambitions,
sensitivities, history, languages, religions, and cultural habits builds
rapport. This rapport, in turn, feeds the mutual confidence that allows
teams to embrace and understand their differences and build the cohesion
necessary for successful teamwork and unity of effort.9
Fearlessness
The third component of a winning mindset for multinational integration is to
be fearless. According to Army doctrine, humility exists on a
continuum where too little humility represents arrogance while too much
humility is interpreted as passivity or timidity (among other issues). To
put this into an Army leadership construct, being open to new opportunities
and experiences and being humble about your knowledge gaps are components of
“being” in a BE-KNOW-DO construct, whereas fearlessness is the path to
translating those attributes into action, or “doing.”10
CPT Phil Tonseth, V Corps Office of the Staff Judge Advocate national
security law attorney, poses while at Exercise Northern Spirit. (Photo
courtesy of author)
Due to our career model, the knowledge requirements of our dual professions,
and other critical demands on our time and attention, very few JALS members
will be bonafide experts in the multinational context in which they must
operate at the outset of an assignment or mission. Waiting to gather
sufficient expertise prior to accomplishing the critical tasks is a recipe
for failure. Therefore, operating in the multinational context requires a
willingness to take action despite not having perfect information.
Multinational partners are willing to give substantial grace for
well-intended actions undertaken with a spirit of humility. Having already
started your journey with the appropriate dose of humility, JALS members can
take action without fear of embarrassment or failure. Further, if things do
not go quite right on the first attempt, the humble JALS member willing to
learn from well-intentioned errors will undoubtedly make the necessary
corrections for the next iteration. Further, the secret power of the legal
tech chain will be there to ensure these are merely opportunities to learn
and grow rather than complete mission failures.
The U.S. Army and the Army JAG Corps are expeditionary organizations. We
will fight on the future battlefield with allies and partners. We will win
on the future battlefield in no small part because of our ability to form
and sustain strong relationships with our teammates from other friendly
nations. Take a moment to consider your JAG Corps, and the significant
number of teammates assigned overseas. Once upon a time, each of these
members of our Corps considered their first overseas assignment and weighed
the risks of discomfort with the opportunity to take on an exciting
challenge. As you consider your next assignment, remember those who
previously seized the opportunity with an open mindset, ample humility, and
fearlessness illuminated the path. I look forward to welcoming you to Europe
or Africa in the future!11
Notes
1. U.S. Dep’t of Army,
Field Manual 3-84, Legal Support to Operations 1-1 (1 Sept. 2023)
[hereinafter FM 3-84].
2. Id. para.
2-18 & fig.2-1.
3.
See id. paras. 2-29 to 2-32; id. para. 2-30
(“Interoperability is the ability to act together coherently, effectively,
and efficiently to achieve tactical, operational, and strategic
objectives.”).
4. U.S. Dep’t of Army,
Reg. 34-1, Interoperability para. 1-8(b) (9 Apr. 2020).
5. See id. para.
1-8(c) (“The foundation of interoperability is broad, spanning all Army
[warfighting functions], with human, procedural, and technical domains.”).
6. This comment itself
was possibly planted by the senior mentor, himself a former NATO Land
Command (LANDCOM) commander.
7. The human dimension
builds the basis of mutual understanding and respect that is fundamental
to unity of effort and operational success.
8. U.S. Dep’t of Army,
Doctrine Pub. 6-22, Army Leadership and the Profession para. 2-31 (31 July
2019) (C1, 25 Nov. 2019) [hereinafter ADP 6-22].
9. See U.S.
Dep’t of Army, Field Manual 3-16, The Army in Multinational Operations
paras. 1-15 to 1-18 (15 July 2024).
10. ADP 6-22,
supra note 8, at ix fig.1 (Logic Map).
11. Although my
comments are focused on Europe, I have served in three other geographic
combatant commands (CONUS/NORTHCOM; INDOPACOM; and CENTCOM) and I believe
this approach to be valid regardless of geographic location.
Authors
COL McKee is the Judge Advocate for U.S. Army Europe
& Africa in Wiesbaden, Germany.