Better Off With CEDS
The Critical Equipment Decontamination System program has completed a key
testing activity, highlighting the progress of a novel transportable
decontamination capability.
By Kelly Burkhalter
Article published on:
December 1, 2025 in the Winter 2025 Issue of the Army AL&T
Magazine
Read Time:
< 7 mins
Clean Sweep: Soldiers detect radiation during chemical, biological,
radiological and nuclear scenario-based decontamination training in the
U.S. Central Command area of operations on February 23, 2024. Service
members train to identify chemical threats with reconnaissance in order
to decontaminate personnel and equipment and reduce casualties. (Photo
by Sgt. Christopher Neu, 69th Air Defense Artillery Brigade)
Developing the best equipment for warfighters requires a delicate balance.
The equipment must be operable across any climate, so it needs to be
rugged and resilient, but it can’t be too heavy. These factors become even
more complex for items used in chemical, biological, radiological and
nuclear (CBRN)-contested environments as they need to maintain operability
in environments where the equipment can be contaminated.
The Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical, Biological, Radiological
and Nuclear Defense (JPEO-CBRND) is working with partners to develop a
capability called the Critical Equipment Decontamination System (CEDS).
Once fielded, CEDS will rapidly decontaminate CBRN-compromised equipment
in forward, austere, hostile and denied areas to support extended
operational mission cycles and reconstitute combat capabilities—keeping
the U.S. Special Operations Command (SOCOM) in the fight.
How It Works
Saving Time, Saving Lives: The CEDS, once fielded, will rapidly
decontaminate sensitive equipment exposed to CBRN fallout, allowing it
to be returned to the field and the fight as soon as possible. The small
variant CEDS is pictured here. (Photo by Lindsay Longobardi, JPM CBRN
SOF)
The CEDS, designed to meet the needs of Special Operations Forces (SOF),
is a transportable system with the capability to rapidly decontaminate
chemical and biological agents from sensitive, low-density-issued
operational equipment to a level that allows reuse. CEDS-treated gear
would not require a warfighter to wear additional protective equipment
when reusing items that have been processed through the system. The goal
of CEDS is to quickly reequip the force and maximize tactical flexibility
and fighting strength, while also minimizing the logistical burden and
cost of conducting countering weapons of mass destruction operations
through CBRN gear survivability.
For example, a warfighter is operating in a CBRN environment and
encounters a suspected agent; the warfighter completes the mission and
conducts a recovery effort by placing critical equipment into the CEDS for
decontamination. Once decontaminated, the critical equipment can be
reissued for use without any additional requirements or risks to force
readiness.
The CEDS is currently an Acquisition Category III program, which began
prototyping efforts in fiscal year 2022. The Joint Project Manager for
CBRN Special Operations (JPM CBRN SOF), JPEO-CBRND, leads the CEDS
program. Two CEDS variants are in development—one large and one small. The
small variant is being developed by Integrated Solutions for Systems Inc.
in Huntsville, Alabama, and the large capability by HDT Expeditionary
Systems Inc. in Fredericksburg, Virginia.
The large variant CEDS resembles a medium-sized metal shipping container,
while the small variant looks like an inflatable tent-like structure with
soft walls.
Putting It To The Test
The small variant CEDS completed developmental and operational testing
(DT/OT) at the Vojenský výzkumný ústav, s.p. (VVU) in the Czech Republic
as part of a larger testing event. The objective for the DT/OT in the
Czech Republic was to conduct field tests to evaluate the small CEDS’
performance at various chemical agent challenge levels.
“Testing CEDS’ decontamination capability on the operational equipment SOF
users rely on to safely complete their missions, using real-life threats
they encounter, was the uncompromising goal I had for this test program,”
said Traci Sheely, JPM CBRN SOF joint product lead for the program of
record portfolio. “Surrogate materials or equipment and simulants [for
chemical agents] don’t provide the level of certainty needed to ensure
that when we field CEDS, we can be confident that our SOF users are safe.
That’s why we chose to conduct this testing at the VVU—to use real-life
threats on actual equipment.”
The team looked at several agents and challenge levels, with and without
pretreatments, to observe how CEDS performed in the environment. Before
testing in the Czech Republic, the team worked with its partners to
conduct preliminary laboratory testing stateside, including new equipment
training and evaluations with SOF users. Once that was done, the team
shipped the system overseas to begin the field tests. Results are
currently being evaluated and will be implemented into the operational
test event for the small variant, which is planned for the first quarter
of fiscal year 2025, while testing for the large variant at the VVU will
begin in the second quarter.
“The biggest advantage of testing in the Czech Republic is that in the
U.S. we have limited facilities for open-air testing. The Czech Republic
has a process where they can set up a site, execute and decontaminate the
site and prepare for the next test, which allows us to move quickly and
gain quality data,” said Laurel O’Connor, CEDS test engineer, U.S. Army
Combat Capabilities Development Command (DEVCOM) Soldier Center. “It’s
also another great opportunity to leverage our international partners to
help get data faster to stay on schedule.”
The ability to quickly prepare, conduct testing, analyze results and
implement changes for the next test is of special importance to the SOCOM
community. Their programs run on a shorter timeline, thus finding ways to
accelerate the schedule wherever possible. Taking on calculated risks
where appropriate allows the team to make the necessary refinements and
deliver solutions to the force.
“The intent is to get the end users what they need as quickly as we can
while also ensuring the equipment performs. It’s a balance between
maintaining a certain speed but not pushing too hard on the process in a
way that would negatively affect the results we need on the backend,”
O’Connor said.
The Results Are In
The analysis of the results and data collected from the testing is a
critical part of the process that cannot be rushed. The CEDS program team
collaborates with different independent organizations to obtain a thorough
analysis. Some of the organizations include the Defense Threat Reduction
Agency, National Assessment Group at Kirkland Air Force Base and the
DEVCOM Analysis Center. This collaboration allowed the team to have
objective analyses of the data to confirm the results obtained during the
testing.
“Due to the nature of CEDS, we want to make sure without a shadow of a
doubt that the data we are basing our decisions and test [results] on are
as accurate as possible,” said Tim Cadle, CEDS assistant program manager
for JPM CBRN SOF. “There are no additional sensors or backstops that can
confirm that CEDS has decontaminated every bit of agent from the
equipment. Thus, we need to be very confident in our data to ensure that
we can say that the system achieves the right efficacy level.”
The CEDS test data the team is obtaining will also support the
development of tactics, techniques and procedures for use with
CEDS when it is fielded to SOCOM. The testing is looking at actual
operational equipment’s efficacy levels and informing the best practices
per equipment set.
“We want to achieve a level of understanding for what is operable for
different pieces of equipment throughout the test process and pass that
information to the end user,” Cadle said. “As an example, if a protective
mask eye lens is difficult to decontaminate to the right efficacy level,
then the entire mask would become a throwaway item. If you want to
mitigate this and recover the mask, then you would need to ensure that the
mask eye lens protective cover is in place during CBRN operations. By
doing this, the throwaway item is now the disposable eye lens protective
cover and not the entire mask. This information gets passed to the end
user as a recommendation that the eye lens protective cover must be worn
during CBRN operations if you want to be able to recover the mask.”
Conclusion
The JPM CBRN SOF CEDS program team and the SOCOM stakeholder community
confirmed that the CEDS small variant prototype design documentation was
sufficient to proceed into fabrication, demonstration and testing. They
also reviewed the technical and test data to ensure that the systems
produced for DT/OT testing in the Czech Republic are standardized against
approved design information and that future design modifications can be
implemented.
“This test event moves us one step closer to fielding the CEDS capability
to SOCOM, which will improve the lethality of the SOF warfighter by
enabling them to quickly reconstitute mission-essential equipment and
resume real-world CBRN response operations,” Sheely said.
The testing event at VVU was a major accomplishment to keep the CEDS
program moving forward, but there is still more to be done before this
equipment can be fielded. The small variant underwent operational testing
in December 2024, while the large variant will commence testing in the
first quarter of 2025. The team is working towards a Milestone C decision
in fiscal year 2025, which would greenlight it for production and
deployment, and then equipping the first SOCOM units in fiscal year 2027.
For more information, contact the JPEO-CBRND Public Affairs Office at
usarmy.apg.dod-jpeo-cbrnd.mbx.jpeo-cbd-public-affairs-office@army.mil
or go to
https://www.jpeocbrnd.osd.mil.
Author
Kelly Burkhalter is a strategic communications
specialist at Booz Allen Hamilton where she leads strategic
communications programs in support of U.S. Army clients, such as the
JPEO-CBRND. She holds an M.A. in communication from Johns Hopkins
University and a B.A. in journalism and English from Syracuse
University.