Fortifying America's Iron Dome-
Modernization in the National Capital Region
By LTC Benton B. Gammons
Article published on: June 16,
2025 in Air Defense Artillery Bulletin 2025 E-Edition
Read Time:<
10 mins
Photo Credit: Lockheed Martin
The enduring lesson of September 11th is that homeland security can never be taken for granted. We as a nation
owe a solemn pledge of vigilance to Never Forget. To that end, our national leadership has called for
an Iron
Dome for America - to bolster homeland defense. This call does not specifically reference the Iron Dome system
that the Israeli Defense Force uses so capably. Instead, this effort broadly speaks to a multifaceted defense
against ballistic, hypersonic, cruise missile, and advanced aerial attacksi. To make the difference clear this
overarching effort was subsequently rebranded as Golden Domeiiii. Regardless of title - the initiative is premised
in a renewed focus on Air and Missile Defense (AMD) and provides an opportunity to improve on our current
systems to most effectively protect against legacy and emerging threats.
The National Capital Region (NCR), home to the instruments of our democracy, must have the highest level of
protection. Today the NCR is fitted with an integrated air defense system (IADS) that leverages a mix of
aircraft, radar, ground-based Short Range Air Defense (SHORAD), and communications systems under Operation Noble
Eagle. The NCR-IADS is distinct from the Iron Dome system that protects the airspace over Israel but provides
the similar protection. Colloquially speaking the NCR-IADS is our Iron Dome, persistently defending our
government on an enduring no-fail mission. Even still - our nation's capital is becoming increasingly vulnerable
as threats evolve. The NCR-IADS needs an upgrade.
In a recent opinion editorial titled "The U.S. Homeland stands unguarded" General Glen VanHerck, the retired
commander of United States Northern Command and North American Aerospace Defense Command, noted that the "nation
is defended by a small number of professionals equipped with systems largely designed and bought in the 1970s
and 80s with no defined path to modernization"iii. General VanHerck highlights a critical fact - as the decades
have passed, the failure to consistently modernize has eroded our tactical edge.
The mission specifically tailored to the NCR is not adequately modernized to keep pace with the emerging threat
picture. This one-off mission, unique in its makeup, is not central to the U.S. Army's stated modernization plan
resulting in a set of challenges specific to the national capital and the integrated air defense missioniv. In
this moment the focus on AMD creates an opportunity to address two of those challenges.
- Pacing the Threat - The mission must keep up with appropriate systems to meet contemporary
threats.
- Modernizing the Kit - The mission's aging weapons systems must be nested in the Army's
modernization plan for new equipment training and fielding.
Pacing the threat: National Advanced Surface to Air Missile System
Technological advances make the world a smaller place. The homeland, once safely cushioned between two vast
oceans, no longer has the same geographical protections. Advancements in hypersonic weaponry include mobile
launching systems that fire from both land and sea-based platformsv. The current NCR-IADS upgrades have been
limited, and the systems generally remain the same as when they were put in place, some 20 years ago. The IADS
needs updated air defense systems that have sufficient magazine depth, or missile reload capabilities, to meet
the threats and sustain the fight.
In 2023, then Deputy Secretary of Defense Kathleen Hicks tasked the Air Force with conducting an Air and Cruise
Missile Defense analysis to determine a way ahead for domestic cruise missile defensevi. The Secretary of Defense
Pete Hegseth identified a commitment to an Iron Dome for the United States as one of his primary goals on his
first day on the jobvii. These
ongoing efforts will ensure the Department of Defense continues to identify ways to
holistically defend critical sites across the nation.
It is imperative that any upgraded systems we acquire can be used domestically. For example, the Army is pursuing
the Indirect Fire Support Capability (IFPC) to bridge the gap between short- and long-range Air Defense. This is
a necessary capability, yet the IFPC uses an AIM 9X Sidewinder interceptor that is tailored to the overseas
fightviii. Although the NCR-IADS
is a unique system with specific requirements, it does not require an entirely new capability.
We can look to ongoing conflicts to inform our acquisitions.
The U.S. has provided a wide range of weaponry and assets to help in the fight against Russian aggression under
the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiativeix. The National Advanced Surface to Air Missile System (NASAM) is one of
the systems that is performing capably against Russian forces. At one point in the conflict, the Pentagon
championed a 100 percent success rate for this systemx. This is precisely the mid-range capability needed to bolster the IADS
mission against threats to the NCR. These systems are not by any means a cure-all. The hypersonic missile threat
will likely require a separate dedicated solution due to their speed and evasiveness. The NASAM is also not an
official Army program of record which presents other complexities in the upkeep and maintenance. Even with IFPC
as the Army SHORAD platform of the future, acquiring this capability still offers pronounced upside. Emplacing
the newest and recently battle-tested NASAM systems to augment the NCR-IADS would keep pace with the threats
that challenge the NCR.
Modernizing the Kit: Directed Energy (High Powered Laser and Microwave)
Short Range Air Defense was deprioritized in the early 2000s. Policymakers surmised the Air Force could maintain
air superiority in the future fight and the Army largely divested itself of SHORAD unitsxi.
Despite these previous predictions, Air Defense is now in high demand across the globe and has been identified as
one of the Army's six modernization prioritiesxii. A range of missile defense capabilities are needed from the
Pacific Ocean to the Middle East. As the Army acquires new capabilities, it will be crucial to focus equally on
both the home and away game - here domestically with homeland defense, as well as outside of the U.S. in
contingency operations.
The Army is updating its SHORAD capability by procuring a maneuverable short-range air defense system (M-SHORAD).
This system will be fielded in three increments. The first increment is underway, adding brand new systems while
converting existing Air Defense battalions to M-SHORAD. The second and third increments will add Directed Energy
(DE) technology and the Next Generation Short-Range Interceptor to the M-SHORAD platform, respectivelyxiii. The second DE increment
offers an opportunity in the NCR-IADS to nest the mission set into the Army Modernization
plan while maximizing existing technology and infrastructure.
DE presents an exciting new field of technology that may be the future of warfare. DE includes high-energy lasers
(HEL) and high-powered microwave (HPM) weapons. This technology is not without its challenges. DE is energy
intensivexiv. When the Army
field tested the M-SHORAD platform in the middle east soldiers reviewing the platform were not impressedxv. Doug Bush, then head of
Army acquisitions, explained that there were challenges to the platform's effectiveness with "different power
levels"xvi. In an austere
combat environment access to power resources, recharge capability, and temperature regulation are prominent
issues for a maneuverable DE platform. To address this the Army is focusing on size, weight, and power as well
as cooling requirements in DE developmentxvii.
Those challenges are mitigated when applied to a fixed air defense in the NCR.
The homeland is an ideal place to leverage any new DE capabilities. The NCR infrastructure will support any Army
approved DE platform with directly linked shore power. Shore power is an energy supply solution where the system
is hard wired into the electrical gridxviii. A shore power model largely resolves the issue of fluctuating
power levels and gives the DE platform an essentially endless magazine since the cost of a DE shot is roughly
the price of the electricityxix. This fire solution is a fraction of the cost of a traditional
kinetic interceptorxx. The
fixed position also allows for secondary climate control mechanisms that regulate
system temperatures, reduce emissions, and lower noise output. Backup power sourcing for any DE solution would
still be neededxxi.
Additionally, atmosphere and weather conditions may possibly impede the effectiveness of any DE shot. Even with
these concerns the dedicated infrastructure makes the NCR the perfect venue to implement an appropriate DE
platform as a lethal option that also provides the mission with required magazine depth. Leveraging DE would
nest the NCR-IADS mission firmly in the Army modernization process while upgrading dated end-of-life systems.
Looking Ahead
Successive National Defense Strategies consistently note that protecting the homeland is our nation's top defense
priorityxxii. The current
administration has reaffirmed this priorityxxiii. It is time to upgrade our Iron Dome. The NCR-IADS is a competent
but aging system, yet the mission is no less critical than the day the nation was attacked by passenger airlines
- turned
cruise missiles. Global conflicts, such as the Russian-Ukraine morass, have helped inform the current state of
Air Defense.
Specifically, the need to reinvest AMD resources into the homeland. We must pace the threat by
purchasing proven air
defense systems, like the current generation NASAMS. We must also modernize the kit by nesting the
NCR-IADS fully into the
Army modernization efforts. Directed energy is ideal to refit the aging SHORAD systems and prepare for the
future fight.
An Iron Dome for America is an ambitious goal. However, a fortification of our current Iron Dome, the NCR-IADS,
is a
homeland defense imperative. We collectively vowed to Never Forget in the wake of that horrific
September morning a
generation past. We honor that commitment by ensuring the NCR-IADS mission has the most up-to-date and effective
systems in the world. This will ensure that our soldiers, airmen and women have the Iron Dome they need to
continue
making the National Capital Region the most secure air space on the face of the earth.
Endnotes:
i. The White House, "Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Directs the
Building
of the Iron Dome Missile Defense Shield for America," January 28, 2025, accessed January 29, 2025,
https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/01/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-directs-the-building-of-the-iron-dome-missile-defense-shield-for-america/
ii. Jen Judson, "Iron Dome for America Gets a Golden Makeover," Defense News, February 25, 2025,
https://www.defensenews.com/pentagon/2025/02/25/iron-dome-for-america-gets-a-golden-makeover/
iii. Glen VanHerck and Pete Fesler, "The U.S. homeland stands unguarded," Wall Street Journal - Opinion,
November 28, 2024, accessed January 4, 2025,
https://www.wsj.com/opinion/the-u-s-homeland-stands-unguarded-military-defense-d3f16845
iv. "2021 Army Modernization Strategy" (U.S. Army, March 30, 2023), accessed January 4, 2025, https://dml.armywarcollege.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Army-Modernization-Strategy-2021.pdf
v. Kelley Sayler, "Hypersonic Weapons: background and issues for Congress,"
Congressional Research Service (Congressional Research Service, January 2, 2025), accessed January 4, 2025,
https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R45811
vi. Jason Sherman, "DOD launches domestic cruise missile defense program to protect U.S. cities, 'critical' sites," Inside
Defense, September 5, 2023, accessed January 4, 2025,
https://insidedefense.com/daily-news/dod-launches-domestic-cruise-missile-defense-program-protect-us-cities-critical-sites
vii. Danielle Wallace, "Hegseth Arrives for 1st Day at Pentagon Stressing Defense's Mission to Protect 'sovereign Territory
of the US," Fox News, January 27, 2025,
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/hegseth-arrives-1st-day-pentagon-stressing-defenses-mission-protect-sovereign-territory-us
viii. The specifics regarding the Sidewinder are above the classification for this paper.
ix. Christine Arabia, Andrew Bowen, and Cory Welt, "U.S. security assistance to Ukraine.,"
Congressional Research Service (Congressional Research Service, May 22, 20240), accessed January 4, 2025,
https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF12040
x. Reuters, Phil Stewart, and Idrees Ali, "NASAMS air defense system have 100% success rate in Ukraine-Pentagon
chief," ed. Alison Williams, Reuters, November 16, 2022, accessed January 4, 2025,
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/nasams-air-defense-system-have-100-success-rate-ukraine-pentagon-chief-2022-11-16/
xi. Andrew Feickert, "U.S. Army Short-Range Air Defense Force Structure and selected Programs: Background and issues
for Congress," Congressional Research Service (Congressional Research Service, July 23, 2020), accessed January 4, 2025,
https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R46463
xii. Christine Wormuth and James McConville, "On the posture of the United States Army," Committee on Armed Services
(Washington D.C., United States of America: Committee on Armed Service - United States Senate, March 30, 2023), accessed January 4, 2025,
https://www.army.mil/e2/downloads/rv7/aps/aps_2023.pdf
xiii. Andrew Feickert, "U.S. Army's Maneuver Short-Range Air Defense (M-SHORAD) System," Congressional Research Service
(Congressional Research Service, May 9, 2023), accessed January 4, 2025, https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF12307
xiv. Kelly Sayler, Jennifer DiMascio, and Andrew Feickert, "Department of Defense Directed Energy Weapons: Background
and issues for Congress," Congressional Research Service (Congressional Research Service, July 11, 2024), accessed January 4, 2025,
https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R4692
xv. Ashley Roque, "Army soldiers not impressed with strykers outfitted with 50-kilowatt lasers, service official says,"
Breaking Defense, December 5, 2024, accessed January 6, 2025,
https://breakingdefense.com/2024/05/army-soldiers-not-impressed-with-strykers-outfitted-with-50-kilowatt-lasers-service-official-says/
xvi. Ibid.
xvii. Sayler, DiMascio, and Feickert, "Department of Defense Directed Energy Weapons: Background and Issues for Congress."
xviii. Jared Worth, "What Is Shore Power and Why Is It Important?," Igus® Engineer's Toolbox, January 9, 2025,
https://toolbox.igus.com/4652/what-is-shore-power
xix. Sayler, DiMascio, and Feickert, "Department of Defense Directed Energy Weapons: Background and Issues for Congress."
xx. Ibid.
xxi. Standard Army signal planning requires a plan for Primary, Alternate, Contingency, Emergency (PACE) support.
xxii. Department of Defense, "National Defense Strategy of the United States of America," Department of Defense, accessed
January 4, 2025,
https://media.defense.gov/2022/Oct/27/2003103845/-1/-1/1/2022-NATIONAL- DEFENSE- STRATEGY- NPR-MDR.pdf
xxiii. The White House, "Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Directs the Building of the Iron Dome Missile Defense
Shield for America."
Author
Benton Gammons is a Lieutenant Colonel in the Florida Army National Guard and currently commands the 1-265th
Air Defense Artillery (ADA) Battalion, deployed in support of Operation Noble Eagle (ONE). He has previous
experience as the Operations Officer for the 164th ADA Brigade, Operations Officer, and Executive Officer
for the 3-265th ADA Battalion, deployed in support of ONE, and as a Company Commander for the 690th MP
Company, deployed in support of Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan. He has served as a Bilateral
Affairs Officer at the U.S. Embassy Guyana and as an Army Congressional Fellow in Washington D.C. LTC
Gammons commissioned in 2004 through the Reserve Officer Training Corps and holds an undergraduate degree in
political science and graduate degrees in international affairs, public administration, and legislative
affairs. Gammons is a graduate of the Command and General Staff College and the Joint Combined Warfare
School.