Fortifying America's Iron Dome-
Modernization in the National Capital Region
By LTC Benton B. Gammons
Article published on: June 16, 2025 in Air Defense
Artillery Bulletin 2025 E-Edition
Read Time:< 10 mins
Photo Credit: Lockheed Martin
The enduring lesson of September 11th is that homeland security can never be
taken for granted. We as a nation owe a solemn pledge of vigilance to
Never Forget. To that end, our national leadership has called for
an Iron Dome for America - to bolster homeland defense. This call does not
specifically reference the Iron Dome system that the Israeli Defense Force
uses so capably. Instead, this effort broadly speaks to a multifaceted
defense against ballistic, hypersonic, cruise missile, and advanced aerial
attacksi. To make the difference clear this overarching effort was subsequently
rebranded as Golden Domeiiii. Regardless of title - the initiative is premised in a renewed focus on
Air and Missile Defense (AMD) and provides an opportunity to improve on our
current systems to most effectively protect against legacy and emerging
threats.
The National Capital Region (NCR), home to the instruments of our democracy,
must have the highest level of protection. Today the NCR is fitted with an
integrated air defense system (IADS) that leverages a mix of aircraft,
radar, ground-based Short Range Air Defense (SHORAD), and communications
systems under Operation Noble Eagle. The NCR-IADS is distinct from the Iron
Dome system that protects the airspace over Israel but provides the similar
protection. Colloquially speaking the NCR-IADS is our Iron Dome,
persistently defending our government on an enduring no-fail mission. Even
still - our nation's capital is becoming increasingly vulnerable as threats
evolve. The NCR-IADS needs an upgrade.
In a recent opinion editorial titled "The U.S. Homeland stands unguarded"
General Glen VanHerck, the retired commander of United States Northern
Command and North American Aerospace Defense Command, noted that the "nation
is defended by a small number of professionals equipped with systems largely
designed and bought in the 1970s and 80s with no defined path to
modernization"iii. General VanHerck highlights a critical fact - as the decades have passed,
the failure to consistently modernize has eroded our tactical edge.
The mission specifically tailored to the NCR is not adequately modernized to
keep pace with the emerging threat picture. This one-off mission, unique in
its makeup, is not central to the U.S. Army's stated modernization plan
resulting in a set of challenges specific to the national capital and the
integrated air defense missioniv. In this moment the focus on AMD creates an opportunity to address two of
those challenges.
-
Pacing the Threat - The mission must keep up with
appropriate systems to meet contemporary threats.
-
Modernizing the Kit - The mission's aging weapons systems
must be nested in the Army's modernization plan for new equipment training
and fielding.
Pacing the threat: National Advanced Surface to Air Missile System
Technological advances make the world a smaller place. The homeland, once
safely cushioned between two vast oceans, no longer has the same
geographical protections. Advancements in hypersonic weaponry include mobile
launching systems that fire from both land and sea-based platformsv. The current NCR-IADS upgrades have been limited, and the systems
generally remain the same as when they were put in place, some 20 years ago.
The IADS needs updated air defense systems that have sufficient magazine
depth, or missile reload capabilities, to meet the threats and sustain the
fight.
In 2023, then Deputy Secretary of Defense Kathleen Hicks tasked the Air
Force with conducting an Air and Cruise Missile Defense analysis to
determine a way ahead for domestic cruise missile defensevi. The Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth identified a commitment to an Iron
Dome for the United States as one of his primary goals on his first day on
the jobvii. These ongoing efforts will ensure the Department of Defense continues to
identify ways to holistically defend critical sites across the nation.
It is imperative that any upgraded systems we acquire can be used
domestically. For example, the Army is pursuing the Indirect Fire Support
Capability (IFPC) to bridge the gap between short- and long-range Air
Defense. This is a necessary capability, yet the IFPC uses an AIM 9X
Sidewinder interceptor that is tailored to the overseas fightviii. Although the NCR-IADS is a unique system with specific requirements, it
does not require an entirely new capability. We can look to ongoing
conflicts to inform our acquisitions.
The U.S. has provided a wide range of weaponry and assets to help in the
fight against Russian aggression under the Ukraine Security Assistance
Initiativeix. The National Advanced Surface to Air Missile System (NASAM) is one of the
systems that is performing capably against Russian forces. At one point in
the conflict, the Pentagon championed a 100 percent success rate for this
systemx. This is precisely the mid-range capability needed to bolster the IADS
mission against threats to the NCR. These systems are not by any means a
cure-all. The hypersonic missile threat will likely require a separate
dedicated solution due to their speed and evasiveness. The NASAM is also not
an official Army program of record which presents other complexities in the
upkeep and maintenance. Even with IFPC as the Army SHORAD platform of the
future, acquiring this capability still offers pronounced upside. Emplacing
the newest and recently battle-tested NASAM systems to augment the NCR-IADS
would keep pace with the threats that challenge the NCR.
Modernizing the Kit: Directed Energy (High Powered Laser and Microwave)
Short Range Air Defense was deprioritized in the early 2000s. Policymakers
surmised the Air Force could maintain air superiority in the future fight
and the Army largely divested itself of SHORAD unitsxi.
Despite these previous predictions, Air Defense is now in high demand across
the globe and has been identified as one of the Army's six modernization
prioritiesxii. A range of missile defense capabilities are needed from the Pacific Ocean
to the Middle East. As the Army acquires new capabilities, it will be
crucial to focus equally on both the home and away game - here domestically
with homeland defense, as well as outside of the U.S. in contingency
operations.
The Army is updating its SHORAD capability by procuring a maneuverable
short-range air defense system (M-SHORAD). This system will be fielded in
three increments. The first increment is underway, adding brand new systems
while converting existing Air Defense battalions to M-SHORAD. The second and
third increments will add Directed Energy (DE) technology and the Next
Generation Short-Range Interceptor to the M-SHORAD platform,
respectivelyxiii. The second DE increment offers an opportunity in the NCR-IADS to nest the
mission set into the Army Modernization plan while maximizing existing
technology and infrastructure.
DE presents an exciting new field of technology that may be the future of
warfare. DE includes high-energy lasers (HEL) and high-powered microwave
(HPM) weapons. This technology is not without its challenges. DE is energy
intensivexiv. When the Army field tested the M-SHORAD platform in the middle east
soldiers reviewing the platform were not impressedxv. Doug Bush, then head of Army acquisitions, explained that there were
challenges to the platform's effectiveness with "different power levels"xvi. In an austere combat environment access to power resources, recharge
capability, and temperature regulation are prominent issues for a
maneuverable DE platform. To address this the Army is focusing on size,
weight, and power as well as cooling requirements in DE developmentxvii. Those challenges are mitigated when applied to a fixed air defense in the
NCR.
The homeland is an ideal place to leverage any new DE capabilities. The NCR
infrastructure will support any Army approved DE platform with directly
linked shore power. Shore power is an energy supply solution where the
system is hard wired into the electrical gridxviii. A shore power model largely resolves the issue of fluctuating power
levels and gives the DE platform an essentially endless magazine since the
cost of a DE shot is roughly the price of the electricityxix. This fire solution is a fraction of the cost of a traditional kinetic
interceptorxx. The fixed position also allows for secondary climate control mechanisms
that regulate system temperatures, reduce emissions, and lower noise output.
Backup power sourcing for any DE solution would still be neededxxi. Additionally, atmosphere and weather conditions may possibly impede the
effectiveness of any DE shot. Even with these concerns the dedicated
infrastructure makes the NCR the perfect venue to implement an appropriate
DE platform as a lethal option that also provides the mission with required
magazine depth. Leveraging DE would nest the NCR-IADS mission firmly in the
Army modernization process while upgrading dated end-of-life systems.
Looking Ahead
Successive National Defense Strategies consistently note that protecting the
homeland is our nation's top defense priorityxxii. The current administration has reaffirmed this priorityxxiii. It is time to upgrade our Iron Dome. The NCR-IADS is a competent but
aging system, yet the mission is no less critical than the day the nation
was attacked by passenger airlines - turned cruise missiles. Global
conflicts, such as the Russian-Ukraine morass, have helped inform the
current state of Air Defense. Specifically, the need to reinvest AMD
resources into the homeland. We must pace the threat by purchasing
proven air defense systems, like the current generation NASAMS. We must also
modernize the kit by nesting the NCR-IADS fully into the Army
modernization efforts. Directed energy is ideal to refit the aging SHORAD
systems and prepare for the future fight.
An Iron Dome for America is an ambitious goal. However, a fortification of
our current Iron Dome, the NCR-IADS, is a homeland defense imperative. We
collectively vowed to Never Forget in the wake of that horrific
September morning a generation past. We honor that commitment by ensuring
the NCR-IADS mission has the most up-to-date and effective systems in the
world. This will ensure that our soldiers, airmen and women have the Iron
Dome they need to continue making the National Capital Region the most
secure air space on the face of the earth.
Endnotes:
i. The White House, "Fact Sheet:
President Donald J. Trump Directs the Building of the Iron Dome Missile
Defense Shield for America," January 28, 2025, accessed January 29,
2025,
https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/01/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-directs-the-building-of-the-iron-dome-missile-defense-shield-for-america/
ii. Jen Judson, "Iron
Dome for America Gets a Golden Makeover," Defense News, February 25,
2025,
https://www.defensenews.com/pentagon/2025/02/25/iron-dome-for-america-gets-a-golden-makeover/
iii. Glen VanHerck and
Pete Fesler, "The U.S. homeland stands unguarded," Wall Street Journal -
Opinion, November 28, 2024, accessed January 4, 2025,
https://www.wsj.com/opinion/the-u-s-homeland-stands-unguarded-military-defense-d3f16845
iv. "2021 Army
Modernization Strategy" (U.S. Army, March 30, 2023), accessed January 4,
2025,
https://dml.armywarcollege.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Army-Modernization-Strategy-2021.pdf
v. Kelley Sayler,
"Hypersonic Weapons: background and issues for Congress,"
Congressional Research Service (Congressional Research Service,
January 2, 2025), accessed January 4, 2025,
https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R45811
vi. Jason Sherman, "DOD
launches domestic cruise missile defense program to protect U.S. cities,
'critical' sites," Inside Defense, September 5, 2023, accessed January
4, 2025,
https://insidedefense.com/daily-news/dod-launches-domestic-cruise-missile-defense-program-protect-us-cities-critical-sites
vii. Danielle Wallace,
"Hegseth Arrives for 1st Day at Pentagon Stressing Defense's Mission to
Protect 'sovereign Territory of the US," Fox News, January 27, 2025,
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/hegseth-arrives-1st-day-pentagon-stressing-defenses-mission-protect-sovereign-territory-us
viii. The specifics
regarding the Sidewinder are above the classification for this paper.
ix. Christine Arabia,
Andrew Bowen, and Cory Welt, "U.S. security assistance to Ukraine.,"
Congressional Research Service (Congressional Research Service,
May 22, 20240), accessed January 4, 2025,
https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF12040
x. Reuters, Phil
Stewart, and Idrees Ali, "NASAMS air defense system have 100% success
rate in Ukraine-Pentagon chief," ed. Alison Williams, Reuters, November
16, 2022, accessed January 4, 2025,
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/nasams-air-defense-system-have-100-success-rate-ukraine-pentagon-chief-2022-11-16/
xi. Andrew Feickert,
"U.S. Army Short-Range Air Defense Force Structure and selected
Programs: Background and issues for Congress,"
Congressional Research Service (Congressional Research Service,
July 23, 2020), accessed January 4, 2025,
https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R46463
xii. Christine
Wormuth and James McConville, "On the posture of the United States
Army," Committee on Armed Services (Washington D.C., United
States of America: Committee on Armed Service - United States Senate,
March 30, 2023), accessed January 4, 2025,
https://www.army.mil/e2/downloads/rv7/aps/aps_2023.pdf
xiii. Andrew
Feickert, "U.S. Army's Maneuver Short-Range Air Defense (M-SHORAD)
System," Congressional Research Service (Congressional Research
Service, May 9, 2023), accessed January 4, 2025,
https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF12307
xiv. Kelly Sayler,
Jennifer DiMascio, and Andrew Feickert, "Department of Defense Directed
Energy Weapons: Background and issues for Congress,"
Congressional Research Service (Congressional Research Service,
July 11, 2024), accessed January 4, 2025,
https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R4692
xv. Ashley Roque,
"Army soldiers not impressed with strykers outfitted with 50-kilowatt
lasers, service official says," Breaking Defense, December 5, 2024,
accessed January 6, 2025,
https://breakingdefense.com/2024/05/army-soldiers-not-impressed-with-strykers-outfitted-with-50-kilowatt-lasers-service-official-says/
xvi. Ibid.
xvii. Sayler,
DiMascio, and Feickert, "Department of Defense Directed Energy Weapons:
Background and Issues for Congress."
xviii. Jared Worth,
"What Is Shore Power and Why Is It Important?," Igus® Engineer's
Toolbox, January 9, 2025,
https://toolbox.igus.com/4652/what-is-shore-power
xix. Sayler,
DiMascio, and Feickert, "Department of Defense Directed Energy Weapons:
Background and Issues for Congress."
xx. Ibid.
xxi. Standard Army
signal planning requires a plan for Primary, Alternate, Contingency,
Emergency (PACE) support.
xxii. Department of
Defense, "National Defense Strategy of the United States of America,"
Department of Defense, accessed January 4, 2025,
https://media.defense.gov/2022/Oct/27/2003103845/-1/-1/1/2022-NATIONAL-
DEFENSE- STRATEGY- NPR-MDR.pdf
xxiii. The White
House, "Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Directs the Building of
the Iron Dome Missile Defense Shield for America."
Author
Benton Gammons is a Lieutenant Colonel in the Florida Army National Guard
and currently commands the 1-265th Air Defense Artillery (ADA) Battalion,
deployed in support of Operation Noble Eagle (ONE). He has previous
experience as the Operations Officer for the 164th ADA Brigade, Operations
Officer, and Executive Officer for the 3-265th ADA Battalion, deployed in
support of ONE, and as a Company Commander for the 690th MP Company,
deployed in support of Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan. He has
served as a Bilateral Affairs Officer at the U.S. Embassy Guyana and as an
Army Congressional Fellow in Washington D.C. LTC Gammons commissioned in
2004 through the Reserve Officer Training Corps and holds an undergraduate
degree in political science and graduate degrees in international affairs,
public administration, and legislative affairs. Gammons is a graduate of
the Command and General Staff College and the Joint Combined Warfare
School.